シャドーイング練習: Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ
練習モードを選ぶ
各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。
122 文
文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。
1
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market.
2
I'm Matthew Hornbach, Global Head of MacroStrategy.
3
And I'm Michael Gapin, Morgan Stanley's Chief U.S.
4
Economist.
5
Today, will the Fed hold or hike?
6
It's the question in the market right now.
7
It's Tuesday, July 28th at 9.30 a.m in New York.
8
Will the Fed display patience or has it run out of patience?
9
That's the question hanging over the July FOMC meeting currently underway.
10
We believe the former.
11
We expect the Fed to keep the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 3.5% to 3.75%.
12
The statement will probably also remain unchanged, reiterating the ample reserve policy,
13
economic activity expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty.
14
So, Mike, what's your assessment of the situation beyond that?
15
Our assessment of the July FOMC meeting is actually the case
16
for hikes is not as persuasive now as it was in June.
17
And I think when we say that and when we come to the decision the Fed will stay on hold this week,
18
we're basing it mainly on the data that has come in since the June FOMC meeting.
19
And two important pieces on that front are employment growth moderated.
20
So in the June meeting, the three-month average payroll gain was running at about $188,000 per month,
21
and I think it gave the sense that the labor market was really accelerating
22
and there was downside risk to the unemployment rate.
23
The subsequent employment data changed that view.
24
Now it looks like there is much less of an acceleration in hiring and momentum has slowed.
25
So the labor market doesn't look quite as robust.
26
Second, there was a lot of information, we think, a lot of signal, about disinflation.
27
So yes, recent volatility in the Middle East did push oil prices temporarily higher.
28
We'll see where that goes.
29
But underneath the hood, there was significant softness in goods inflation and services inflation, particularly related to housing.
30
So we do think that there was a lot of evidence that disinflation is here.
31
So with those two things in mind, we think there's less of a case to hike in July than there was in June.
32
So we think the right thing, or what we think the Fed will do, is to skip July, try and buy a little more time, get a little more information.
33
If disinflation is indeed here, the Fed stays on hold.
34
If not, and inflation stays firm, well, they could move to rate hikes later this year.
35
But we think the case to hike in July is less compelling than it was in June.
36
Well, they certainly will get a lot more information between the July meeting
37
and the September meeting if memory serves at least two more rounds of all of the major economic data points,
38
payrolls, CPI, and so on.
39
That's right.
40
The gap between the The July FOMC meeting and the September FOMC meeting is the longest on the Fed's calendar.
41
Of course, in part, that makes room for Jackson Hole in August, which if the Fed were moving to a tightening cycle, could be a venue to lay out the case for that.
42
But you're right, they will see multiple employment and inflation reports before they meet again in September.
43
If they really wanted to get ahead of that data and move at this meeting,
44
what is the case for hiking rates in July?
45
How would you think about that perspective?
46
I think you could make a couple of cases to hike now.
47
One is recent volatility
48
and conflict in the Middle East has pushed oil prices higher
49
maybe it convinces you you're in a prolonged oil risk premium scenario and inflation will not dissipate.
50
Second, I think you could argue, well, it's a balance of risks argument, and we think risks have just shifted in the direction of inflation,
51
where last year they were in the direction of a weaker labor market.
52
We eased last year, let's just reverse those risk management rate cuts this year.
53
So it's not about inflation in hand.
54
It's about your view of risks around inflation.
55
Another, I think, and to me this is the most important one, is maybe Walsh wants a regime change in the reaction function.
56
In other words, he emphasizes price stability and achieving the 2% target.
57
Well, at some point, words are words and actions are actions, and maybe what he desires is a more hawkish reaction function
58
and kind of a higher interest rate all else equal to guide inflation down to 2% more quickly.
59
So I think, Matt, if we're wrong this week, I think the main reason we're wrong is I'm thinking under an older reaction function,
60
and Warsh is bringing a new one.
61
And right now, we don't exactly know what his reaction function is, and he could reveal it this week as being in a
62
direction where he really wants to concentrate on the inflation side of the mandate to the exclusion of nearly everything else.
63
Well, I don't think that's lost on markets at all.
64
In fact, I think
65
that the rise in yields we've seen in the bond market
66
concentrated in the real yield component of the 10-year Treasury bond
67
tells you a lot about how investors are thinking the Fed
68
will react to higher energy prices as energy prices have gone up,
69
so have bond yields, the relationship between those two asset prices are very strong.
70
And usually what that suggests is
71
if the real yield is going up more than the break-even inflation rate is going up as energy prices rise,
72
it's telling you that investors think the Fed will not look through the rise in energy prices.
73
If you have the opposite happen, where your break-even inflation rate is going higher, more so than the real interest rate is going higher,
74
that would suggest investors think the Fed will look through the energy price increase.
75
That just hasn't been the case.
76
And so I think investors are very much attuned to what they think is the right reaction function for the Fed.
77
But I guess we'll see.
78
Only time will tell.
79
And I think in order to help us tell what the right reaction function is,
80
we'll need some communication from the Fed and maybe that's where I want to go next with you, is on communication.
81
It does seem like there have been fewer FOMC participants speaking to the public since Chairman Warsh began his tenure as chairman. Is that your impression?
82
How do you think about communication?
83
And since we are in the midst of this FOMC meeting, the press conference, what do you think about press conferences going forward?
84
I do think you're right.
85
I haven't counted up the literal official FOMC communications.
86
I do think there have likely been fewer speeches and or interviews given recently.
87
And whether or not that's a function of Kevin Warsh is the chairman or it's summer and things move a little slower, I don't know.
88
I will say though that when participants have spoken, I think we're getting the same, say, normal communication that they brought in the past.
89
So far, I don't read participants as unwilling to provide their view about the outlook for the economy and for monetary policy.
90
On the press conference, boy, would that be a change.
91
I've been of the view
92
that you probably will not get what I'll call a major change to the SEPs
93
or the press conferences in terms of their frequency until the task force on communications has run its course,
94
where I think the deadline is ultimately later this year.
95
So I don't think the schedule of press conferences will change until 2027, if it changes at all.
96
But if we don't have them, the way that I would look at that, Matt, is to say, if the Fed's speaking less,
97
there will be a vacuum out there to some degree.
98
So if the Fed's giving its view on the outlook and monetary policy less frequently, something else will fill that narrative.
99
Whether it's markets or the private sector or whatever it is, vacuums are going to get filled.
100
If the Fed's speaking less, somebody else will speak more.
101
Maybe that drives volatility more.
102
I guess it would depend on the situation.
103
But I think polling press conferences would be a major surprise.
104
I don't think it's in market expectations, and my belief is it would probably lead to some increase in volatility over time.
105
How would you read it?
106
Absolutely.
107
I think the void has already begun to be filled by investors and how they think about the Fed's reaction function,
108
rightly or wrongly, which is why I think we've seen real yields move in a very positively correlated way with energy prices.
109
investors are intuiting a certain reaction function to higher energy prices.
110
Whether or not that is the correct view, only time will tell.
111
And if we do have a press conference at this upcoming meeting, which it looks very likely that we will,
112
investors are going to, as they have done now for, really since the press conferences began,
113
they're going to pay attention to every nuance, every shift in tonality of the chairman's voice,
114
how he chooses to address certain questions versus others,
115
or whether he chooses to address questions will certainly be important for market participants
116
and how they invest in the bond and the currency markets.
117
Well, with that, Mike, thanks again for taking the time to talk.
118
I look forward to catching up with you again in late August around the Jackson Hole Symposium.
119
Great speaking with you, Matt.
120
Thanks for having me on.
121
And thanks for listening.
122
If you enjoy Thoughts on the Market, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share the podcast with a friend or colleague today.
アプリをダウンロード
流暢に話すために必要なすべて
AI発音採点文ごとに採点
IPA練習すべての音をマスター
単語学習自分の単語帳を作る
単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える
📺 同じチャンネル
✨ おすすめ動画
C11
64 文
Don't think Fed should be hiking here, says 3Fourteen's Warren Pies
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C1338 文
FOMC Press Conference, September 16, 2026
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
198 文
To Save the Economy... We’re About to Break It
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
294 文
Gold: Dubious Speculation
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
159 文
Untangling Signals of Market Stress
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
59 文
Pronunciation in Use Advanced, Unit 49, On the whole, it went very well
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
65 文
Even Scarier than we thought | Faye D'Souza
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
183 文
Marco Rubio is on a different level..
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
22 文
U.S. banks face rising funding cost pressures | Vietnam Today
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
189 文
JD Vance On The US Economy, Trump Administration’s Handling Of Epstein Files | The View
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
85 文
Significant slowdown in AI payoff could tip economy into a recession, says Apollo Global's Slok
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント
このC1レベルのスピーキングレッスンは、動画「Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking」を教材にしています。 繰り返し出てくる語は次のとおりです：inflation, Fed, meeting, price, function。 この動画には、シャドーイング用の文が122文、単語が1643語あります。 音声の長さは10:31です。 話す速さは1分あたり約156語で、日常会話に近い自然なペースです。 単語の84%は英語の頻出3,000語に含まれます。残りは練習の前に確認しておきましょう。
この動画の重要語彙
動画の中で特に難しい単語15語を、発音と意味つきで紹介します。
| 単語 | 発音 | 意味 |
|---|---|---|
| hike 名詞 | /haɪk/ | 散策, ハイキング |
| investor 名詞 | /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/ | 投資家, 出資者 |
| volatility 名詞 | /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/ | 揮発性 |
| participant 名詞 | /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/ | 参加者, 関与者 |
| concentrate 動詞 | /ˈkɑn.sən.tɹeɪt/ | 集中させる |
| vacuum 名詞 | /ˈvæ.kjuːm/ | 真空 |
| compel 動詞 | /kəmˈpɛl/ | 強いる |
| nuance 名詞 | /ˈnjuː.ɑːns/ | ニュアンス, 意味合い |
| tonality 名詞 | /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/ | 調性 |
| accelerate 動詞 | /ɪkˈsɛl.əˌɹeɪt/ | 加速する |
| emphasize 動詞 | /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/ | 強調する, アクセントをつける |
| acceleration 名詞 | /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/ | 加速 |
| literal 形容詞 | /ˈlɪt(ə)ɹəl/ | 逐語的な, 文字通り |
| underway 副詞 | /ʌndəɹˈweɪ/ | 進行中で |
| economist 名詞 | /iˈkɑ.nə.mɪst/ | 経済学者, エコノミスト |
動画に出てくる句動詞
| 単語 | 意味 |
|---|---|
| go up 動詞 | 上がる, 登る |
| look forward to 動詞 | 楽しみにする |
繰り返し練習したい文
動画に出てくる短く完結した文です。日常会話でそのまま使えます。
- We'll see where that goes.
- How would you think about that perspective?
- It's about your view of risks around inflation.
- How do you think about communication?
- How would you read it?
注意したい発音
話し手はdon't, we're, I'mなど、短縮形や弱形を28回使っています。聞こえたとおりの短い形で発音しましょう。
- 「sh」と「zh」の音: disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, hawkish /ˈhɔːkɪʃ/, exclusion /ɪksˈkluːʒən/, acceleration /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/
- 長い単語（アクセントの位置に注意）: volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, participant /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/, disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, reiterate /ɹiːˈɪt.ə.ɹeɪt/, tonality /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/
日本語話者が苦手な音：
- /r/ と /l/ の区別 — /l/ は舌先を歯茎につけ、/r/ はどこにもつけない: payroll /ˈpeɪˌɹəʊl/, correlate /ˈkɔɹəleɪt/, prolong /pɹoʊˈlɑŋ/, wrongly /ˈɹɔŋ.li/, accelerate /ɪkˈsɛl.əˌɹeɪt/
- /v/ — /b/ にならないように、上の歯を下唇に当てる: investor /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/, volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, vacuum /ˈvæ.kjuːm/, elevate /ˈɛləveɪt/, persuasive /pə(ɹ)ˈsweɪsɪv/
- /f/ — 「フ」ではなく、上の歯と下唇で出す: disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, softness /ˈsɔftnəs/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/
この動画での練習方法
- まず声を出さずに動画を最後まで聞き、知らない単語をメモします。
- まず0.75倍速で一文ずつシャドーイングし、慣れてきたら通常の速度に戻します。
- 自分の声を録音して元の音声と比べます。hike, investor, volatilityなどの単語に特に注意しましょう。
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。