쉐도잉 연습: Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기
연습 모드 선택
각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.
122 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market.
2
I'm Matthew Hornbach, Global Head of MacroStrategy.
3
And I'm Michael Gapin, Morgan Stanley's Chief U.S.
4
Economist.
5
Today, will the Fed hold or hike?
6
It's the question in the market right now.
7
It's Tuesday, July 28th at 9.30 a.m in New York.
8
Will the Fed display patience or has it run out of patience?
9
That's the question hanging over the July FOMC meeting currently underway.
10
We believe the former.
11
We expect the Fed to keep the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 3.5% to 3.75%.
12
The statement will probably also remain unchanged, reiterating the ample reserve policy,
13
economic activity expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty.
14
So, Mike, what's your assessment of the situation beyond that?
15
Our assessment of the July FOMC meeting is actually the case
16
for hikes is not as persuasive now as it was in June.
17
And I think when we say that and when we come to the decision the Fed will stay on hold this week,
18
we're basing it mainly on the data that has come in since the June FOMC meeting.
19
And two important pieces on that front are employment growth moderated.
20
So in the June meeting, the three-month average payroll gain was running at about $188,000 per month,
21
and I think it gave the sense that the labor market was really accelerating
22
and there was downside risk to the unemployment rate.
23
The subsequent employment data changed that view.
24
Now it looks like there is much less of an acceleration in hiring and momentum has slowed.
25
So the labor market doesn't look quite as robust.
26
Second, there was a lot of information, we think, a lot of signal, about disinflation.
27
So yes, recent volatility in the Middle East did push oil prices temporarily higher.
28
We'll see where that goes.
29
But underneath the hood, there was significant softness in goods inflation and services inflation, particularly related to housing.
30
So we do think that there was a lot of evidence that disinflation is here.
31
So with those two things in mind, we think there's less of a case to hike in July than there was in June.
32
So we think the right thing, or what we think the Fed will do, is to skip July, try and buy a little more time, get a little more information.
33
If disinflation is indeed here, the Fed stays on hold.
34
If not, and inflation stays firm, well, they could move to rate hikes later this year.
35
But we think the case to hike in July is less compelling than it was in June.
36
Well, they certainly will get a lot more information between the July meeting
37
and the September meeting if memory serves at least two more rounds of all of the major economic data points,
38
payrolls, CPI, and so on.
39
That's right.
40
The gap between the The July FOMC meeting and the September FOMC meeting is the longest on the Fed's calendar.
41
Of course, in part, that makes room for Jackson Hole in August, which if the Fed were moving to a tightening cycle, could be a venue to lay out the case for that.
42
But you're right, they will see multiple employment and inflation reports before they meet again in September.
43
If they really wanted to get ahead of that data and move at this meeting,
44
what is the case for hiking rates in July?
45
How would you think about that perspective?
46
I think you could make a couple of cases to hike now.
47
One is recent volatility
48
and conflict in the Middle East has pushed oil prices higher
49
maybe it convinces you you're in a prolonged oil risk premium scenario and inflation will not dissipate.
50
Second, I think you could argue, well, it's a balance of risks argument, and we think risks have just shifted in the direction of inflation,
51
where last year they were in the direction of a weaker labor market.
52
We eased last year, let's just reverse those risk management rate cuts this year.
53
So it's not about inflation in hand.
54
It's about your view of risks around inflation.
55
Another, I think, and to me this is the most important one, is maybe Walsh wants a regime change in the reaction function.
56
In other words, he emphasizes price stability and achieving the 2% target.
57
Well, at some point, words are words and actions are actions, and maybe what he desires is a more hawkish reaction function
58
and kind of a higher interest rate all else equal to guide inflation down to 2% more quickly.
59
So I think, Matt, if we're wrong this week, I think the main reason we're wrong is I'm thinking under an older reaction function,
60
and Warsh is bringing a new one.
61
And right now, we don't exactly know what his reaction function is, and he could reveal it this week as being in a
62
direction where he really wants to concentrate on the inflation side of the mandate to the exclusion of nearly everything else.
63
Well, I don't think that's lost on markets at all.
64
In fact, I think
65
that the rise in yields we've seen in the bond market
66
concentrated in the real yield component of the 10-year Treasury bond
67
tells you a lot about how investors are thinking the Fed
68
will react to higher energy prices as energy prices have gone up,
69
so have bond yields, the relationship between those two asset prices are very strong.
70
And usually what that suggests is
71
if the real yield is going up more than the break-even inflation rate is going up as energy prices rise,
72
it's telling you that investors think the Fed will not look through the rise in energy prices.
73
If you have the opposite happen, where your break-even inflation rate is going higher, more so than the real interest rate is going higher,
74
that would suggest investors think the Fed will look through the energy price increase.
75
That just hasn't been the case.
76
And so I think investors are very much attuned to what they think is the right reaction function for the Fed.
77
But I guess we'll see.
78
Only time will tell.
79
And I think in order to help us tell what the right reaction function is,
80
we'll need some communication from the Fed and maybe that's where I want to go next with you, is on communication.
81
It does seem like there have been fewer FOMC participants speaking to the public since Chairman Warsh began his tenure as chairman. Is that your impression?
82
How do you think about communication?
83
And since we are in the midst of this FOMC meeting, the press conference, what do you think about press conferences going forward?
84
I do think you're right.
85
I haven't counted up the literal official FOMC communications.
86
I do think there have likely been fewer speeches and or interviews given recently.
87
And whether or not that's a function of Kevin Warsh is the chairman or it's summer and things move a little slower, I don't know.
88
I will say though that when participants have spoken, I think we're getting the same, say, normal communication that they brought in the past.
89
So far, I don't read participants as unwilling to provide their view about the outlook for the economy and for monetary policy.
90
On the press conference, boy, would that be a change.
91
I've been of the view
92
that you probably will not get what I'll call a major change to the SEPs
93
or the press conferences in terms of their frequency until the task force on communications has run its course,
94
where I think the deadline is ultimately later this year.
95
So I don't think the schedule of press conferences will change until 2027, if it changes at all.
96
But if we don't have them, the way that I would look at that, Matt, is to say, if the Fed's speaking less,
97
there will be a vacuum out there to some degree.
98
So if the Fed's giving its view on the outlook and monetary policy less frequently, something else will fill that narrative.
99
Whether it's markets or the private sector or whatever it is, vacuums are going to get filled.
100
If the Fed's speaking less, somebody else will speak more.
101
Maybe that drives volatility more.
102
I guess it would depend on the situation.
103
But I think polling press conferences would be a major surprise.
104
I don't think it's in market expectations, and my belief is it would probably lead to some increase in volatility over time.
105
How would you read it?
106
Absolutely.
107
I think the void has already begun to be filled by investors and how they think about the Fed's reaction function,
108
rightly or wrongly, which is why I think we've seen real yields move in a very positively correlated way with energy prices.
109
investors are intuiting a certain reaction function to higher energy prices.
110
Whether or not that is the correct view, only time will tell.
111
And if we do have a press conference at this upcoming meeting, which it looks very likely that we will,
112
investors are going to, as they have done now for, really since the press conferences began,
113
they're going to pay attention to every nuance, every shift in tonality of the chairman's voice,
114
how he chooses to address certain questions versus others,
115
or whether he chooses to address questions will certainly be important for market participants
116
and how they invest in the bond and the currency markets.
117
Well, with that, Mike, thanks again for taking the time to talk.
118
I look forward to catching up with you again in late August around the Jackson Hole Symposium.
119
Great speaking with you, Matt.
120
Thanks for having me on.
121
And thanks for listening.
122
If you enjoy Thoughts on the Market, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share the podcast with a friend or colleague today.
앱 다운로드
유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것
AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인
IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터
단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기
단어 게임놀면서 외우기
📺 같은 채널
✨ 추천 영상
C11
64 문장
Don't think Fed should be hiking here, says 3Fourteen's Warren Pies
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C1338 문장
FOMC Press Conference, September 16, 2026
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
198 문장
To Save the Economy... We’re About to Break It
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
294 문장
Gold: Dubious Speculation
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
159 문장
Untangling Signals of Market Stress
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
59 문장
Pronunciation in Use Advanced, Unit 49, On the whole, it went very well
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
183 문장
Marco Rubio is on a different level..
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
22 문장
U.S. banks face rising funding cost pressures | Vietnam Today
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
189 문장
JD Vance On The US Economy, Trump Administration’s Handling Of Epstein Files | The View
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
85 문장
Significant slowdown in AI payoff could tip economy into a recession, says Apollo Global's Slok
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
12 문장
Fed Rate Decision At FOMC Meeting
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트
이 C1 수준 말하기 레슨은 영상 “Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 가장 자주 반복되는 단어는 다음과 같습니다: inflation, Fed, meeting, price, function. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 122개와 단어 1643개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 10:31입니다. 화자는 분당 약 156단어로, 일상 대화에 가까운 자연스러운 속도로 말합니다. 단어의 84%가 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속합니다. 나머지는 연습 전에 미리 확인해 두세요.
이 영상의 핵심 어휘
영상에서 가장 어려운 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.
| 단어 | 발음 | 뜻 |
|---|---|---|
| hike 명사 | /haɪk/ | 등산, 하이킹 |
| investor 명사 | /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/ | 투자자 |
| participant 명사 | /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/ | 참가자 |
| payroll 명사 | /ˈpeɪˌɹəʊl/ | 인건비 |
| vacuum 명사 | /ˈvæ.kjuːm/ | 진공 |
| compel 동사 | /kəmˈpɛl/ | 강요하다 |
| nuance 명사 | /ˈnjuː.ɑːns/ | 뉘앙스 |
| tonality 명사 | /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/ | 조성 |
| exclusion 명사 | /ɪksˈkluːʒən/ | 제외, 배제 |
| emphasize 동사 | /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/ | 강조(强調)하다 |
| acceleration 명사 | /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/ | 가속 |
| economist 명사 | /iˈkɑ.nə.mɪst/ | 경제학자 |
| mandate 명사 | /ˈmændeɪ̯t/ | 위임, 권한 |
| colleague 명사 | /ˈkɒliːɡ/ | 동료, 동업자 |
| uncertainty 명사 | /ʌnˈsɜːtənti/ | 불확실 |
영상에 나오는 구동사
| 단어 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| go up 동사 | 올라가다 |
따라 말해 볼 만한 문장
영상에 나오는 짧고 완결된 문장으로, 일상 대화에서 그대로 쓸 수 있습니다:
- We'll see where that goes.
- How would you think about that perspective?
- It's about your view of risks around inflation.
- How do you think about communication?
- How would you read it?
주의할 발음
화자는 don't, we're, I'm 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 28번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.
- “sh”와 “zh” 소리: disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, hawkish /ˈhɔːkɪʃ/, exclusion /ɪksˈkluːʒən/, acceleration /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/
- 긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, participant /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/, disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, reiterate /ɹiːˈɪt.ə.ɹeɪt/, tonality /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/
한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:
- /f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, softness /ˈsɔftnəs/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/
- /v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: investor /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/, volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, vacuum /ˈvæ.kjuːm/, elevate /ˈɛləveɪt/, persuasive /pə(ɹ)ˈsweɪsɪv/
- /z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/, positively /ˈpɑ.zɪ.tɪv.li/
이 영상으로 연습하는 방법
- 먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
- 0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
- 자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, hike, investor, participant 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.
쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법
쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.