शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें
अभ्यास मोड चुनें
हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।
122 वाक्य
यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।
1
Welcome to Thoughts on the Market.
2
I'm Matthew Hornbach, Global Head of MacroStrategy.
3
And I'm Michael Gapin, Morgan Stanley's Chief U.S.
4
Economist.
5
Today, will the Fed hold or hike?
6
It's the question in the market right now.
7
It's Tuesday, July 28th at 9.30 a.m in New York.
8
Will the Fed display patience or has it run out of patience?
9
That's the question hanging over the July FOMC meeting currently underway.
10
We believe the former.
11
We expect the Fed to keep the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 3.5% to 3.75%.
12
The statement will probably also remain unchanged, reiterating the ample reserve policy,
13
economic activity expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty.
14
So, Mike, what's your assessment of the situation beyond that?
15
Our assessment of the July FOMC meeting is actually the case
16
for hikes is not as persuasive now as it was in June.
17
And I think when we say that and when we come to the decision the Fed will stay on hold this week,
18
we're basing it mainly on the data that has come in since the June FOMC meeting.
19
And two important pieces on that front are employment growth moderated.
20
So in the June meeting, the three-month average payroll gain was running at about $188,000 per month,
21
and I think it gave the sense that the labor market was really accelerating
22
and there was downside risk to the unemployment rate.
23
The subsequent employment data changed that view.
24
Now it looks like there is much less of an acceleration in hiring and momentum has slowed.
25
So the labor market doesn't look quite as robust.
26
Second, there was a lot of information, we think, a lot of signal, about disinflation.
27
So yes, recent volatility in the Middle East did push oil prices temporarily higher.
28
We'll see where that goes.
29
But underneath the hood, there was significant softness in goods inflation and services inflation, particularly related to housing.
30
So we do think that there was a lot of evidence that disinflation is here.
31
So with those two things in mind, we think there's less of a case to hike in July than there was in June.
32
So we think the right thing, or what we think the Fed will do, is to skip July, try and buy a little more time, get a little more information.
33
If disinflation is indeed here, the Fed stays on hold.
34
If not, and inflation stays firm, well, they could move to rate hikes later this year.
35
But we think the case to hike in July is less compelling than it was in June.
36
Well, they certainly will get a lot more information between the July meeting
37
and the September meeting if memory serves at least two more rounds of all of the major economic data points,
38
payrolls, CPI, and so on.
39
That's right.
40
The gap between the The July FOMC meeting and the September FOMC meeting is the longest on the Fed's calendar.
41
Of course, in part, that makes room for Jackson Hole in August, which if the Fed were moving to a tightening cycle, could be a venue to lay out the case for that.
42
But you're right, they will see multiple employment and inflation reports before they meet again in September.
43
If they really wanted to get ahead of that data and move at this meeting,
44
what is the case for hiking rates in July?
45
How would you think about that perspective?
46
I think you could make a couple of cases to hike now.
47
One is recent volatility
48
and conflict in the Middle East has pushed oil prices higher
49
maybe it convinces you you're in a prolonged oil risk premium scenario and inflation will not dissipate.
50
Second, I think you could argue, well, it's a balance of risks argument, and we think risks have just shifted in the direction of inflation,
51
where last year they were in the direction of a weaker labor market.
52
We eased last year, let's just reverse those risk management rate cuts this year.
53
So it's not about inflation in hand.
54
It's about your view of risks around inflation.
55
Another, I think, and to me this is the most important one, is maybe Walsh wants a regime change in the reaction function.
56
In other words, he emphasizes price stability and achieving the 2% target.
57
Well, at some point, words are words and actions are actions, and maybe what he desires is a more hawkish reaction function
58
and kind of a higher interest rate all else equal to guide inflation down to 2% more quickly.
59
So I think, Matt, if we're wrong this week, I think the main reason we're wrong is I'm thinking under an older reaction function,
60
and Warsh is bringing a new one.
61
And right now, we don't exactly know what his reaction function is, and he could reveal it this week as being in a
62
direction where he really wants to concentrate on the inflation side of the mandate to the exclusion of nearly everything else.
63
Well, I don't think that's lost on markets at all.
64
In fact, I think
65
that the rise in yields we've seen in the bond market
66
concentrated in the real yield component of the 10-year Treasury bond
67
tells you a lot about how investors are thinking the Fed
68
will react to higher energy prices as energy prices have gone up,
69
so have bond yields, the relationship between those two asset prices are very strong.
70
And usually what that suggests is
71
if the real yield is going up more than the break-even inflation rate is going up as energy prices rise,
72
it's telling you that investors think the Fed will not look through the rise in energy prices.
73
If you have the opposite happen, where your break-even inflation rate is going higher, more so than the real interest rate is going higher,
74
that would suggest investors think the Fed will look through the energy price increase.
75
That just hasn't been the case.
76
And so I think investors are very much attuned to what they think is the right reaction function for the Fed.
77
But I guess we'll see.
78
Only time will tell.
79
And I think in order to help us tell what the right reaction function is,
80
we'll need some communication from the Fed and maybe that's where I want to go next with you, is on communication.
81
It does seem like there have been fewer FOMC participants speaking to the public since Chairman Warsh began his tenure as chairman. Is that your impression?
82
How do you think about communication?
83
And since we are in the midst of this FOMC meeting, the press conference, what do you think about press conferences going forward?
84
I do think you're right.
85
I haven't counted up the literal official FOMC communications.
86
I do think there have likely been fewer speeches and or interviews given recently.
87
And whether or not that's a function of Kevin Warsh is the chairman or it's summer and things move a little slower, I don't know.
88
I will say though that when participants have spoken, I think we're getting the same, say, normal communication that they brought in the past.
89
So far, I don't read participants as unwilling to provide their view about the outlook for the economy and for monetary policy.
90
On the press conference, boy, would that be a change.
91
I've been of the view
92
that you probably will not get what I'll call a major change to the SEPs
93
or the press conferences in terms of their frequency until the task force on communications has run its course,
94
where I think the deadline is ultimately later this year.
95
So I don't think the schedule of press conferences will change until 2027, if it changes at all.
96
But if we don't have them, the way that I would look at that, Matt, is to say, if the Fed's speaking less,
97
there will be a vacuum out there to some degree.
98
So if the Fed's giving its view on the outlook and monetary policy less frequently, something else will fill that narrative.
99
Whether it's markets or the private sector or whatever it is, vacuums are going to get filled.
100
If the Fed's speaking less, somebody else will speak more.
101
Maybe that drives volatility more.
102
I guess it would depend on the situation.
103
But I think polling press conferences would be a major surprise.
104
I don't think it's in market expectations, and my belief is it would probably lead to some increase in volatility over time.
105
How would you read it?
106
Absolutely.
107
I think the void has already begun to be filled by investors and how they think about the Fed's reaction function,
108
rightly or wrongly, which is why I think we've seen real yields move in a very positively correlated way with energy prices.
109
investors are intuiting a certain reaction function to higher energy prices.
110
Whether or not that is the correct view, only time will tell.
111
And if we do have a press conference at this upcoming meeting, which it looks very likely that we will,
112
investors are going to, as they have done now for, really since the press conferences began,
113
they're going to pay attention to every nuance, every shift in tonality of the chairman's voice,
114
how he chooses to address certain questions versus others,
115
or whether he chooses to address questions will certainly be important for market participants
116
and how they invest in the bond and the currency markets.
117
Well, with that, Mike, thanks again for taking the time to talk.
118
I look forward to catching up with you again in late August around the Jackson Hole Symposium.
119
Great speaking with you, Matt.
120
Thanks for having me on.
121
And thanks for listening.
122
If you enjoy Thoughts on the Market, please leave us a review wherever you listen and share the podcast with a friend or colleague today.
ऐप डाउनलोड करें
धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ
AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर
IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत
शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ
शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें
उसी चैनल से
FOR YOU
अनुशंसित वीडियो
C11
64 वाक्य
Don't think Fed should be hiking here, says 3Fourteen's Warren Pies
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C1338 वाक्य
FOMC Press Conference, September 16, 2026
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
583 वाक्य
Emergency Podcast: Why Vietnam Will Boom For The Next 5 Years | Michael Kokalari | EP 412
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
198 वाक्य
To Save the Economy... We’re About to Break It
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
294 वाक्य
Gold: Dubious Speculation
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
159 वाक्य
Untangling Signals of Market Stress
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
59 वाक्य
Pronunciation in Use Advanced, Unit 49, On the whole, it went very well
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C11
65 वाक्य
Even Scarier than we thought | Faye D'Souza
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
183 वाक्य
Marco Rubio is on a different level..
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
22 वाक्य
U.S. banks face rising funding cost pressures | Vietnam Today
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
189 वाक्य
JD Vance On The US Economy, Trump Administration’s Handling Of Epstein Files | The View
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव
यह C1 स्तर का स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “Fed in July: A Weaker Case for Hiking” पर आधारित है। सबसे ज़्यादा दोहराए गए शब्द ये हैं: inflation, Fed, meeting, price, function। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 122 वाक्य और 1643 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 10:31 लंबा है। वक्ता लगभग 156 शब्द प्रति मिनट की स्वाभाविक गति से बोलता है, जो रोज़मर्रा की बातचीत के करीब है। 84% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं; बाकी शब्द अभ्यास से पहले देख लेना अच्छा रहेगा।
इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली
वीडियो के 15 सबसे कठिन शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:
| शब्द | उच्चारण | अर्थ |
|---|---|---|
| investor संज्ञा | /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/ | विनिधानकर्ता, निवेशक |
| participant संज्ञा | /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/ | भागी, भागिनी |
| vacuum संज्ञा | /ˈvæ.kjuːm/ | निर्वात |
| compel क्रिया | /kəmˈpɛl/ | विवश करना |
| correlate क्रिया | /ˈkɔɹəleɪt/ | सहसंबंध करना, संबंध जोड़ना |
| softness संज्ञा | /ˈsɔftnəs/ | कोमलता, मृदुलता |
| ample विशेषण | /ˈæm.pəl/ | प्रचुर, पर्याप्त |
| acceleration संज्ञा | /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/ | त्वरण |
| positively क्रिया विशेषण | /ˈpɑ.zɪ.tɪv.li/ | असल में, निश्चयेन |
| mandate संज्ञा | /ˈmændeɪ̯t/ | अधिदेश, शासनादेश |
| colleague संज्ञा | /ˈkɒliːɡ/ | सहकर्मी, साथी |
| expectation संज्ञा | /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/ | आशा, अपेक्षा |
| void विशेषण | /vɔɪd/ | रिक्त |
| uncertainty संज्ञा | /ʌnˈsɜːtənti/ | संदेह, संशय |
| momentum संज्ञा | /ˌmə(ʊ)ˈmɛntəm/ | संवेग |
दोहराने लायक वाक्य
वीडियो के छोटे, पूरे वाक्य जिन्हें आप रोज़ की बातचीत में इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं:
- We'll see where that goes.
- How would you think about that perspective?
- It's about your view of risks around inflation.
- How do you think about communication?
- How would you read it?
ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण
वक्ता 28 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे don't, we're, I'm। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।
- “sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, hawkish /ˈhɔːkɪʃ/, exclusion /ɪksˈkluːʒən/, acceleration /əkˌsɛl.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/
- लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, participant /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/, disinflation /ˈdɪsɪnfleɪ̯ʃən/, reiterate /ɹiːˈɪt.ə.ɹeɪt/, tonality /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/
हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:
- /v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: investor /ɪnˈvɛs.tə(ɹ)/, volatility /ˌvɑ.ləˈtɪl.ə.ti/, vacuum /ˈvæ.kjuːm/, elevate /ˈɛləveɪt/, persuasive /pə(ɹ)ˈsweɪsɪv/
- /z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/, positively /ˈpɑ.zɪ.tɪv.li/
- /æ/ — “ऐ” से ज़्यादा खुला: vacuum /ˈvæ.kjuːm/, tonality /toʊnˈæl.ɪ.ti/, ample /ˈæm.pəl/, mandate /ˈmændeɪ̯t/
इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें
- पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
- 0.75× गति से शुरू करें, एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें, और सहज लगने पर सामान्य गति पर लौटें।
- अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर investor, participant, vacuum जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।
शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?
शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।