쉐도잉 연습: This Nobel Prize Winner Has a Really Strange Theory About the Mind - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.

162 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
This video is sponsored by Factor.
2
Get chef -crafted, ready -to -eat meals delivered straight to your door.
3
Go to factor75 .com and use code WONDERFB50 to get 50 % off your first
4
Factor box and free breakfast for one year.
5
In 2003, J .M.
6
Coetzee was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.
7
When giving his acceptance speech, he didn't discuss his career, he didn't lecture about culture or politics, he didn't thank anyone.
8
He didn't even really discuss literature.
9
Instead, he gave one of if not the most unusual
10
Nobel Prize acceptance speeches in history.
11
Following a brief reference to a childhood memory, he proceeded to recite a strange kind of parable.
12
When introducing it, he said, The piece is called He and His Man, or His Man and He.
13
I cannot remember which comes first, he or his man.
14
This was not a lapse in Coetzee's memory.
15
He knew the name of the story.
16
Fundamentally, we all live two separate lives.
17
One is our direct lived experience.
18
That is, what our bodies and brains encounter, produce, and sense.
19
All that is unconscious or external, but nonetheless real and integral to who we are.
20
The second is our conscious awareness.
21
That is, what our conscious mind observes, comprehends, conceptualizes, and tracks through language, ideas, beliefs, and stories.
22
In Kochi's speech, he refers to two men, he and his man.
23
He is an old retired sailor who has moved on from adventure
24
and sea life and now spends almost all of his time alone in his room.
25
His primary interaction with the world and others is through reports
26
that he regularly receives from the character referred to as his man, an individual who travels around Europe encountering various events and phenomena.
27
It is soon revealed that the retired sailor is Robinson Crusoe, one of the most famous fictional characters in history.
28
This character originated in the 1719 novel titled Robinson Crusoe, written by the author Daniel Defoe,
29
in which he is an English sailor who was shipwrecked on a remote island for 28 years before finally being rescued.
30
What turns Coetzee's speech from interesting to profound, and perhaps a bit unsettling, is that Crusoe's correspondent, his man, is Daniel Defoe.
31
In other words, Defoe is sending messages to the character he created in the story Coetzee created.
32
In Coetzee's story, Crusoe and Defoe have a strange and ambiguous kind of relationship.
33
On one hand, they seem to know and depend on each other intimately.
34
On the other hand, they appear to be quite unknown and distant to each other.
35
Neither really know the life of the other directly.
36
Crusoe knows of Defoe's experiences only through his reports, and Defoe seems to know of Crusoe,
37
if at all, only as a kind of receiving entity of his reports.
38
Coetzee says, How are they to be figured, this man and he?
39
As master and slave?
40
As brothers, twin brothers?
41
As comrades in arms?
42
Or as enemies, foes?
43
What name shall he give this nameless fellow, with whom he shares his evenings and sometimes his nights too,
44
who is absent only in the daytime when he, Robin, walks the keys inspecting the new arrivals and his man gallops about the kingdom,
45
making his inspections.
46
There are many ways one could interpret the premise to such an enigmatic story and character relationship.
47
On a literary level, it seems to possibly be a reflection on the relationship between writer
48
or artist and the characters or things they create.
49
What does a writer or artist do if not report their lived experiences to a kind of entity of reception—their work, their worlds, and their characters.
50
In this, the Creator feels as though they are producing a character, story, or world.
51
But in a way, they are sort of already there.
52
That is, the character, story, or world already exist as a kind of nebulous entity of lived experience.
53
They merely increasingly form into semi -tangible structures as they receive
54
more information from the Creator's conscious mind a kind of embodiment of the creator's awareness
55
and experience as they're assembled with words and features.
56
Coatsy writes, How then has it come about that this man of his, who is a kind of parrot and not much loved,
57
writes as well as or better than his master?
58
For he wields an able pen, this man of his, no doubt of that.
59
Only when he yields himself up to this man of his do such words come.
60
There's also a deeper interpretation here.
61
The very nature of the mind and consciousness, how we form knowledge and understanding and how we don't.
62
Whether we write or not, whether we publish or not, each of us are authors.
63
Our self, the conscious observer and narrator of our lives, is the product of our mind's creative work,
64
the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves and the world, the concepts we form and the beliefs we hold.
65
Our source material
66
Our inspiration is all of the sensations of the body and brain and their interactions with the external world.
67
Naturally, these two channels, experiencer and observer, are always trying to work together.
68
Both born of and sharing the same fundamental substrate of being, they both operate toward the same shared goals.
69
Survival and continuance.
70
On the unconscious experiential level, this is fairly obvious.
71
We automatically try to catch our balance when we trip, move our hand away from something hot or sharp, we blink and breathe automatically,
72
our heart rate automatically increases, and we become adrenalized when we perceive a threat, and so on.
73
On the conscious observer level, it's slightly less obvious, but still apparent.
74
We attempt to make order, meaning, and rigidity out of our experiences through language, concepts, stories, and beliefs.
75
Our conscious mind attempts to make sense of, tolerate, and rationalize events so that we can best endure and proceed onward.
76
Though the miracle of human consciousness
77
and the degree of our conceptual awareness is perhaps only second to the miracle of existence itself, it is of course deeply limited.
78
We can only comprehend what we can perceive, and we can only perceive what the human brain has evolved to process.
79
Moreover, words and concepts are always merely a proxy, symbols of reality and experience, never the real things.
80
Thus, these two channels of experience don't really understand each other all that well.
81
One is out in the world experiencing a chaos of phenomena, while the other is alone inside its room, trying to parse the chaos into clarity.
82
What is left is a kind of dissonance between reality and consciousness.
83
In Kochi's story, one of the main reports sent back to Crusoe describes what are known as duck decoy systems,
84
Elaborate traps constructed to lure wild ducks to be killed for food.
85
Using ponds, nets, channels, and decoy ducks, the configurations are designed to look natural and safe,
86
deceiving the ducks into moving through them until they become trapped.
87
From the ducks' perspectives, they aren't doing anything odd or unnatural.
88
The traps work because they look completely real and safe to the ducks.
89
They see waterways, food, and other ducks, and they simply follow their instincts of perception.
90
But in the end, the pond is not real, and the ducks become consumed.
91
Coetzee writes,
92
them of, where they shall live safely and securely.
93
Of course, we aren't ducks, but the distance between the abilities of our perception
94
and the true nature of reality is likely inconceivably further than the distance between us and ducks.
95
Like the ducks in the decoy systems, we don't misunderstand reality because we're foolish or irrational or doing anything unnatural.
96
We misunderstand reality because nature deceives us.
97
Reality, to us, is a human decoy system constructed out of human language, and yet its truth is entirely beyond human language.
98
This interpretation maps fairly cleanly onto several philosophical theories and schools of thought.
99
What is known as transcendental idealism, originally founded by 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant, argues that, in simple terms,
100
human knowledge is forever limited to the appearances of things.
101
That is, we can never access the world that exists outside of human perception, the thing in itself, reality.
102
What we perceive is inexorably shaped by the a priori structures of the human mind.
103
Nineteenth -century philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer argued in his masterwork, The World as Will and Representation, the world is fundamentally divided into two components.
104
The will, which is the unified underlying substrate of reality that endlessly strives to sustain and express itself, and representation, which is how the world,
105
or the expressions of the will, appears to consciousness.
106
According to Schopenhauer, we can never directly access the true reality of things, except through bodily sensations.
107
The body gives us a kind of access point to the will, a direct subjective correspondent sending us reports.
108
But when trying to interpret and transcribe these reports into concepts and words, we move away from the will and into representation, a distortion.
109
Schopenhauer writes,
110
namely, that which represents, and this is himself.
111
Everything that exists for knowledge and hence the whole of this world is only object in relation to the subject, perception of the perceiver.
112
In a word, representation.
113
Likewise, the philosophy of Taoism suggests that the observing self, experiencing self, and external world are all inseparable in a state of constant flux,
114
carried out by what is referred to as the Tao, the true underlying unified nature of reality.
115
But as such, the Tao exists solely beyond concepts and language.
116
It cannot be named or understood.
117
Ideas and terms, including the Tao itself, can only gesture in its direction.
118
Reality in this case isn't exactly a trap, but trying to comprehend and categorize it is.
119
We must rather flow with it, letting go of rigidity, explanations, and certainties.
120
The opening verse of the Tao Te Ching reads, The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao.
121
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
122
The nameless is the origin of heaven and earth.
123
The named is the mother of myriad things.
124
Thus, constantly without desire, one observes its essence.
125
Constantly with desire, one observes its manifestations.
126
These two emerge together but differ in name.
127
The unity is said to be the mystery, mystery of mysteries, the door to all wonders.
128
In the end, Coetzee seems to possibly be representing a similar kind of inability to comprehend the world
129
and define the self through a sequence of character relationships.
130
Robinson Crusoe's relationship with his creator, Daniel Defoe, and Crusoe and Defoe's relationship with Coetzee, who, in this story, is sort of their creator.
131
In this web of fiction weaved out of experience, it is an obvious what and who is real, if anything.
132
Referring back to Coetzee's introduction to his story, when he says, The piece is called He and His Man, or His Man and He.
133
I cannot remember which comes first, he or his man.
134
There is something subtle yet deeply important in this preface that seems to cleanly summarize the authorship problem of identity and truth.
135
We imagine we are the author of our thoughts and selves,
136
but we are characters being written by the reports of forces we barely understand or have access to.
137
We are both a character being written
138
and the author of the character in the same story
139
we are not solely the observing mind we are not solely the experiencing body
140
and we are not the external world
141
we are the sum total of all of it all in constant motion
142
we are each an expression of the will the Tao a universal awareness
143
or the universe itself whichever word or concept you like because in the end whichever word or concept you like is irrelevant.
144
Of course, what is relevant to continuing on and flowing with reality is eating.
145
Ironically, despite eating being one of the most basic and fundamental aspects of our condition, getting and preparing good quality,
146
good -tasting meals can be extremely time -consuming and inconvenient.
147
This video's sponsor, Factor, helps solve that exact problem.
148
Personally, I'm not big into cooking, and I'm someone who tries to prioritize time and focus as well as I can.
149
Shopping and cooking are just not often at the top of that list, if I can avoid them.
150
The problem is, of course, alternatives can be junk food or expensive meals out,
151
but Factor makes it so I can both reduce time shopping and cooking without compromising on taste or nutrition.
152
Factor's meals are made with real ingredients, have balanced macros, and come with at least two vegetables per meal,
153
which makes the challenge of maintaining a balanced diet much easier to overcome.
154
The meals are ready to eat, so no planning, prep, or cleanup.
155
Just open, heat if needed, and eat.
156
I absolutely love the Monterey spinach chicken I recently had, which was ready in minutes.
157
Particularly this time of year, when I'm trying to maintain work while enjoying the summer, Factor helps me eat well with real food while reducing stress
158
and time in a way that is one of those things you notice actually improves your life.
159
97 % of people say
160
Factor helps them live a healthier life, and 92 % say it makes their life less stressful.
161
I'm certainly one of them.
162
and see you next video.

앱 다운로드

유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것

AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인
IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터
단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기
단어 게임놀면서 외우기
QR 스캔
QR 스캔
Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play

같은 채널

The Terrible Paradox of Self-Awareness | Fernando PessoaC1
1

The Terrible Paradox of Self-Awareness | Fernando Pessoa

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Something Weird Happens When You See How Connected Everything IsB2
1

Something Weird Happens When You See How Connected Everything Is

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
The Hedgehog Theory: Why Your Favorite Smart Person Is (Probably) Full of Sh*tC1
2

The Hedgehog Theory: Why Your Favorite Smart Person Is (Probably) Full of Sh*t

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Don't Try - The Philosophy of Charles BukowskiC1
2

Don't Try - The Philosophy of Charles Bukowski

Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
How the Way You Respond to Anxiety Changes Your Life - Søren Kierkegaard on AngstC1
7

How the Way You Respond to Anxiety Changes Your Life - Søren Kierkegaard on Angst

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Cosmic Insignificance Theory: A Simple Idea That Will Change Your Life ForeverC1
12

Cosmic Insignificance Theory: A Simple Idea That Will Change Your Life Forever

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
You're Too Self-Aware to Be Happy | The Psychology of Deep ThinkersC1
3

You're Too Self-Aware to Be Happy | The Psychology of Deep Thinkers

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
The Terrible Price of Not Choosing Yourself - The Philosophy of Osamu DazaiC1
3

The Terrible Price of Not Choosing Yourself - The Philosophy of Osamu Dazai

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
The Nova Effect - The Tragedy of Good LuckB2
2

The Nova Effect - The Tragedy of Good Luck

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Becoming Your True Self - The Psychology of Carl JungC1
2

Becoming Your True Self - The Psychology of Carl Jung

University StudentsWorking Adults
The Paradox of Being a Good Person - George Orwell's Warning to the WorldC1
12

The Paradox of Being a Good Person - George Orwell's Warning to the World

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
This Simple Tool Will Improve Your Critical ThinkingB2

This Simple Tool Will Improve Your Critical Thinking

Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
The Black Swan Theory - The Random Moments That Change EverythingC1

The Black Swan Theory - The Random Moments That Change Everything

Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU

추천 영상

Why Einstein is a “peerless genius” and Hawking is an “ordinary genius” | Albert-László BarabásiC1
4
100 문장

Why Einstein is a “peerless genius” and Hawking is an “ordinary genius” | Albert-László Barabási

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an AnswerC1
1
654 문장

Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
This 19th Century Cure For Brain Rot Will Make You UnstoppableC1
2
290 문장

This 19th Century Cure For Brain Rot Will Make You Unstoppable

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Stop Playing Small. Go All In.C1
1
140 문장

Stop Playing Small. Go All In.

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Literature Might Not Save You — Ocean VuongC1
3
19 문장

Literature Might Not Save You — Ocean Vuong

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Writer Anne Carson, 2026 Nobel Laureate, on the Art of Paying AttentionC1
5
24 문장

Writer Anne Carson, 2026 Nobel Laureate, on the Art of Paying Attention

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
First reactions | Francis Halzen, Nobel Prize in Physics 2026 | telephone interviewB2
1
86 문장

First reactions | Francis Halzen, Nobel Prize in Physics 2026 | telephone interview

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Kenyon College: John Green Commencement AddressC1
2
136 문장

Kenyon College: John Green Commencement Address

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
Romanticizing The Classical Life Isn’t Foolish.. It’s Necessary To Survive TodayC1
1
191 문장

Romanticizing The Classical Life Isn’t Foolish.. It’s Necessary To Survive Today

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
How Different Are Our Inner Monologues?C1
6
108 문장

How Different Are Our Inner Monologues?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
This 1 Book Has Produced More Geniuses Than Any University in HistoryC1
2
174 문장

This 1 Book Has Produced More Geniuses Than Any University in History

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 말하기 레슨은 영상 “This Nobel Prize Winner Has a Really Strange Theory About the Mind”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 가장 자주 반복되는 단어는 다음과 같습니다: character, reality, duck, experience. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 162개와 단어 2224개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 14:28입니다. 화자는 분당 약 154단어로, 일상 대화에 가까운 자연스러운 속도로 말합니다. 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속하는 단어가 78%뿐이라 어휘가 어려운 편입니다.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어발음뜻
duck 명사/dʌk/오리
meal 명사/ˈmiːl/끼니, 밥
observe 동사/əbˈzɜːv/관찰하다
trap 명사/tɹæp/덫, 올가미
consciousness 명사/ˈkɑnʃəsnəs/의식, 자각
perceive 동사/pɚˈsiv/감지하다, 지각하다
belief 명사/bɪˈliːf/믿음
mystery 명사/ˈmɪs.t(ə.)ɹi/신비, 미스터리
creator 명사/kɹiːˈeɪ̯təː/조물주
entity 명사/ˈɛn.tə.ti/ [-tʰi]실재
sailor 명사/ˈseɪ.lɚ/선원, 수병
argue 동사/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/논하다, 의논하다
refer 동사/ɹɪˈfɜː/언급하다
deeply 부사/ˈdi(ː)pli/깊이
merely 부사/ˈmɪəli/한낱, 그저

영상에 나오는 구동사

단어발음뜻
carry out 동사/ˈkæ.ɹi aʊt/실행하다, 행하다

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점is sponsored · was awarded · is called
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때has moved · has it come · has evolved
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보will, which is · someone who tries · had, which was

주의할 발음

화자는 didn't, I'm, don't 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 16번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.

  • “th” 소리: breathe /bɹiːð/, nonetheless /ˌnʌnðəˈlɛs/, nineteenth /ˌnaɪnˈtiːnθ/
  • “sh”와 “zh” 소리: conscious /ˈkɑn.ʃəs/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, perception /pɚˈsɛpʃ(ə)n/, consciousness /ˈkɑnʃəsnəs/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/
  • 긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, entity /ˈɛn.tə.ti/ [-tʰi], fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, interpretation /ɪnˌtɜːpɹəˈteɪʃən/

한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:

  • /f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: belief /bɪˈliːf/, refer /ɹɪˈfɜː/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/, phenomenon /fəˈnɒm.ɪ.nən/, philosopher /fəˈlɑsəfɚ/
  • /v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: observe /əbˈzɜːv/, perceive /pɚˈsiv/, observer /əbˈzɝvɚ/, whichever /wɪt͡ʃˈɛvɚ/, universal /ˌjunəˈvɜɹs(ə)l/
  • /z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: observe /əbˈzɜːv/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, observer /əbˈzɝvɚ/, likewise /ˈlaɪkˌwaɪz/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

  1. 먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
  2. 0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
  3. 자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, duck, meal, observe 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →