쉐도잉 연습: 移民搶工作，還是最低工資害的？大學生 vs 保守派 8 分鐘完整辯論｜中英字幕 - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.

160 문장

문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.

I guess in the free market example, you have 100 people, but there's no illegal immigration, but there's no minimum wage.

These people are naturally incentivized to get together and agree, you know, we won't accept any wage lower than this,

like collective bargaining, which is kind of like a socialist principle.

So I guess I'm just proposing if these...

Well, they can do that, but at the end of the day, the business owner will be able to decide, right?

It's true.

And if these people, then they're going to starve.

You know, you work or don't eat.

I guess that's fair, yeah.

I guess my argument here is that the capitalist system that we have, you know, with free markets inherently drifts towards this kind of cronyism

and I think part of this economic system enables

and in part requires the mass immigration that we see today

and I mean maybe it's it's weird to think about

but I'll give like a little economics example I guess imagine there's a thousand people at this university

and there's like 10 jobs on university

and everybody says I will no longer accept any what's it called any wage lower than $15 an hour all

So these people are thinking, okay, well, I'm not going to get paid $14 or $13.

But it's in these companies' interests, these businesses that work there,

simply to make the most money and to expand that they need people who will accept less wages.

So let's say, well, why don't we bring in a whole bunch of people from overseas?

Yes, I see the argument that you're making, and I don't mean to interrupt you, but it's rather long.

The point is not with immigrants.

The point is with minimum wage laws.

Because minimum wage laws are not free market.

You are telling an employer what amount they are able to pay an employee, right?

I'm not sure.

Do you know what the profit margin of the majority of small businesses in America is?

I assume it's pretty slim.

It's 1 % is the average, right?

So now let's say you're a business and you don't have a minimum wage

and you're paying two guys $10 an hour to go and work and sell sandwiches, whatever.

Now the government comes in and says, well, you have to pay these people $15 an hour.

What does that do?

You've got to fire a guy, right?

And so now you're paying, maybe one guy gets paid a little bit more, but now you have less of a worker.

It makes your business suffer, right?

The business owner should be the one in a free market to decide how much I pay this person.

And if someone comes in and says, well, that's not fair, then they can go to a different business, right?

Or achieve different skills to advance themselves to go and do a different thing themselves, right?

So it's not actually an immigration debate you're having on that.

It's a minimum wage law debate.

All right.

I understand where you're coming from.

And for the sake of the example, or my argument, let's say there was no minimum wage laws, there would still kind of be a societal,

say there's 100 people, you know, they all need this amount to survive, or they want this amount.

And I think immigration, see if there still is no minimum wage laws, let's say they're paying a guy like 10 bucks.

If you could still bring in a guy and pay him one bucks as a business owner, you totally would, right?

Right.

But you can do that with an American citizen, too, if you have no minimum wage law

because you could have before 1960 right this country was like 90 percent white

and pretty much everyone was legal everyone was actually a citizen of this country right

so how did we get these things done before

that right you know what i mean you know i'm saying

so it's like people were willing to do those jobs

and take less money and then build themselves up or

if it said oh i'm not getting paid enough here

or i don't like my boss i'll go find a different type of job

you know what i mean yeah no i agree with you saying um i guess i just have to touch like inflation.

I mean, you know, back in the 1950s, 1960s, a lot of people could afford a house,

a home, a college education with a lot less work than we do have nowadays.

And my argument is just the more people we have and the more people that move in,

the less your average person gets paid because there's so many people

that the value of like how much it pays one person goes down.

So I guess my value of labor does go down with more immigration.

So I guess my argument is

that our economic system needs the value of labor to go down to reduce input costs because we want cheaper stuff.

Everybody here, they want to consume goods, whether it be media or iPhones or food.

And in order for that, you know, you can do a lot of supply chain management.

By the end of the day, it really comes down to how low can we get the cost of labor?

And if you were to go completely libertarian with it and say, you know, completely free markets and all of this,

then having completely free markets with no regulations is the only way you can have illegal immigration.

Because if you don't have completely free markets and you have wage, minimum wage laws, you have regulations, you have anti -globalism, you have tariffs,

you have protectionism, all these different things, it will not induce business to actually thrive,

and people will get the shaft on that for the immigrants and for the citizens who are in that country.

Because then there's no reason for them to pay American citizens that wage.

If they know they can pay an illegal immigrant less, then why would they pay an American citizen more for the same job?

Exactly.

Right.

Which is what I'm saying, and that's part of the minimum wage.

So if you got rid of the minimum wage, then maybe some American comes and says,

well, I'll work on a farm for the same price that an illegal immigrant is doing it for now,

you know, and then build my way up.

You have that freedom.

But with minimum wage laws, you don't have that freedom.

Yeah, I have to agree with that.

But I still think that as business owners, your interest is you must make as much profit

or else someone else will make more profit you outcompete

you you lose right thank goodness that's how it should be um

and that's a that's a very dynamic system

and allows for a lot of the companies we have nowadays

which can really create a lot of you know gdp

and buildings and everything around us but i would argue

that it is in their inherent interest simply to make profit

that illegal immigration and immigration as a whole is desired so it's

In my view, at least, it's impossible to view immigration as an issue in itself

when you need to consider that these businesses really want that as well.

Right, but if they could choose to pay, if an American could choose to have themselves work for less, they would.

The problem is a minimum wage of why these people want to bring in illegals

because they're forced to pay an American citizen this much.

100

Whereas if they're an illegal alien, they can pay them whatever they want, right?

101

Right?

102

So of course.

103

But if you had people in a total free market and said, oh, we can pay this person whatever I want

104

and then I can choose to be paid whatever I want within the market, whatever this employer wants to pay me,

105

and people can shop around and say this job's good, this one's not, then the illegal immigration is,

106

you know, it's not nearly as worthwhile for businesses to want because they can just pay citizens.

107

I mean, paying people less, they'll have less money to spend.

108

That lowers the standard of living.

109

I guess this is kind of a weird shift to the argument.

110

I guess it's better phrased as like, if we even allow this as a thing to happen, even if it's just paying people less,

111

these companies still need to make money.

112

They're still going to lower input costs and the quality of your average person.

113

And we're putting quality in terms of material,

114

which I don't really think your life and your happiness is determined by how many things you can buy.

115

You know, money doesn't buy happiness.

116

I think it's a lot more meaningful than that.

117

But in our current society, you know, money and well -being is mostly just financial.

118

How much money do I have?

119

How much new things can I buy?

120

You know, all that sort of thing.

121

If you allow these businesses to, I guess, in the free market example, you have 100 people, but there's no illegal immigration,

122

but there's no minimum wage.

123

These people are naturally incentivized to get together and agree, you know, we won't accept any wage lower than this,

124

like collective bargaining, which is kind of like a socialist principle.

125

So I guess I'm just proposing.

126

Well, they can do that, but at the end of the day, the business owner will be able to decide, right?

127

It's true.

128

And if these people, then they're going to starve.

129

You know, you work or don't eat.

130

I guess that's fair, yeah.

131

That's how you've got to look at it, you know.

132

These are able -bodied people.

133

So, I guess how you put it...

134

I'll end it with this, just back and forth.

135

Because I know I've got other people in line.

136

I don't want everyone to get held up.

137

I guess I'll come back later.

138

But in order to solve the illegal immigration problem in an incentive purpose, you would have to lower the minimum,

139

or you'd have to remove minimum wages to allow for dynamic labor?

140

Yes.

141

that is definitely part of the problem yes i just personally worry

142

that this kind of decreases your average living

143

and i think it makes people on a i think people as a whole would come together

144

if they're getting paid

145

so little yeah i mean that's what unions are yeah you know people have the ability to make unions

146

and do those kind of things not that usually they do any good

147

but um that that is their freedom to be able to do right yeah

148

but like if a business was run by five of its own workers

149

and there was no real incentive to make a massive amount of profit

150

but more just i guess it doesn't work that way

151

because uh they need to make profit to have their job secured

152

but um like a business owned by its own workers would

153

never support importing people to replace them for lower wages

154

so they make more money so my argument is

155

that businesses themselves as they're currently structured any employee wouldn't want someone to come in

156

and take their job even if they don't own the means of production exactly

157

but an executive would because they can pay them less

158

so I'm just saying I'll end it here

159

because I mean right it's kind of like why you have to stop illegal immigration

160

Thank you.

앱 다운로드

유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것

AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인

IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터

단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기

단어 게임놀면서 외우기

QR 스캔

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

같은 채널

FOR YOU

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 말하기 레슨은 영상 “移民搶工作，還是最低工資害的？大學生 vs 保守派 8 分鐘完整辯論｜中英字幕”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 가장 자주 반복되는 단어는 다음과 같습니다: wage, minimum, guess, immigration, illegal. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 160개와 단어 1945개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 9:03입니다. 화자는 분당 약 215단어로 빠르게 말하므로 연음과 약하게 발음되는 소리가 많습니다. 단어의 88%가 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속해 어휘가 쉬운 편입니다.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어	발음	뜻
wage 명사	/weɪd͡ʒ/	임금, 급료
immigration 명사	/ˌɪmɪˈɡɹeɪʃən/	이주, 이민
citizen 명사	/ˈsɪtɪzən/	시민
immigrant 명사	/ˈɪmɪɡɹənt/	이민, 이민자
worker 명사	/ˈwɝ.kɚ/	노동자, 로동자
happiness 명사	/ˈhæpinɪs/	행복, 기쁨
regulation 명사	/ˌɹɛɡjʊˈleɪʃən/	규칙
principle 명사	/ˈpɹɪn.sɪ.pəl/	원리, 원칙
employer 명사	/ɪmˈplɔɪə/	고용주
socialist 명사	/ˈsoʊ.ʃə.lɪst/	사회주의자
nowadays 부사	/ˈnaʊ.ə.deɪz/	요즘
propose 동사	/pɹəˈpəʊz/	제안(提案)하다
starve 동사	/stɑɹv/	굶어죽다
argue 동사	/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/	논하다, 의논하다
suffer 동사	/ˈsʌfɚ/	괴로와하다, 시달리다

영상에 나오는 구동사

단어	뜻
get together 동사	만나다
come back 동사	돌아오다
go down 동사	내려가다

따라 말해 볼 만한 문장

영상에 나오는 짧고 완결된 문장으로, 일상 대화에서 그대로 쓸 수 있습니다:

You know, you work or don't eat.
You've got to fire a guy, right?
I understand where you're coming from.
How much money do I have?
How much new things can I buy?

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형	영상 속 표현
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점	are naturally incentivized · is desired · be paid
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보	bargaining, which is · people who will

주의할 발음

화자는 don't, I'm, they're 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 50번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.

“th” 소리: worthwhile /ˌwɜː(ɹ)θˈwaɪl/, thrive /θɹajv/
“sh”와 “zh” 소리: immigration /ˌɪmɪˈɡɹeɪʃən/, regulation /ˌɹɛɡjʊˈleɪʃən/, socialist /ˈsoʊ.ʃə.lɪst/, inflation /ɪnˈfleɪ.ʃən/, shaft /ˈʃɑːft/
긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: immigration /ˌɪmɪˈɡɹeɪʃən/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/, regulation /ˌɹɛɡjʊˈleɪʃən/, economics /ˌiːkəˈnɒmɪks/, capitalist /ˈkæp.ɪ.tə.lɪst/

한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:

/f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: suffer /ˈsʌfɚ/, phrase /ˈfɹeɪ̯z/, inflation /ɪnˈfleɪ.ʃən/, meaningful /ˈmiː.nɪŋ.fl̩/, shaft /ˈʃɑːft/
/v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: collective /kəˈlɛktɪv/, incentive /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/, starve /stɑɹv/, solve /sɒlv/, overseas /ˌoʊvɚˈsiːz/
/z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: citizen /ˈsɪtɪzən/, nowadays /ˈnaʊ.ə.deɪz/, propose /pɹəˈpəʊz/, whereas /(h)wɛɹˈæz/, phrase /ˈfɹeɪ̯z/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, wage, immigration, citizen 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →

쉐도잉 연습: 移民搶工作，還是最低工資害的？大學生 vs 保守派 8 分鐘完整辯論｜中英字幕 - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

앱 다운로드

같은 채널

選前 11 天，川普 10 分鐘連嗆 CNN、NBC 兩家記者｜白宮記者問答・中英字幕

十年後的電腦會長什麼樣？黃仁勳：就像今天的手機，最少拿來打電話｜中英字幕

18 歲大一生 vs 反墮胎倡議者：不被想要的孩子該不該生？｜美國校園辯論・中英字幕

추천 영상

The Liberalism to Fascism Pipeline (Neoliberalism Explained)

就活解禁の３月「超売り手市場」で就活生×採用側のニーズは【ぎゅっと】（2026年3月2日OA）

The Gig Economy is Full

My Country Is Choosing Extinction (Korea)

Peter Singer | It Is NOT Immoral To Be A Billionaire (8/8) | Oxford Union

WORK - HRM Lecture 08

【English Podcast】Is a College Degree Still Worth It? — 4 Things to Consider

China-youth unemployment

Anxiety is the Dizziness of Freedom｜英文Talk：焦虑是好事，恰恰因为现代社会的流动性强

Does Rent Control ACTUALLY Work? Obama’s Chief Economist Breaks it Down | The Brief

Marxism vs libertarianism: The economic calculation problem

I Don't Care About Illegal Immigration