Shadowing Practice: Why Religious Tools Don't Work For Women - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

169 zinnen

Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.

One time when my four kids were little, I was at my parents' house for Christmas,

and my mom had us do an activity where we wrote down a gift

that we would like to give to Jesus in the form of an act of service for someone else

or a sacrifice that we would make in his name.

This is a very common activity for Christian families, and it's supposed to be a tender, peaceful experience.

So I was surprised that I found myself inexplicably filled with rage.

I stared at the paper where I was supposed to be writing down my special self -sacrifice and I started bawling.

I had given and given and given and given and I had nothing left to give and I felt terrible about it.

Interestingly, I've heard from women in other religious traditions share similar feelings.

Let's talk about why.

Confucianism, Buddhism, and Christianity are three of the largest and most influential religious traditions in the world.

What did their founders teach?

Confucius was born in 6th century BCE China during a time of chaos.

Local warlords were constantly battling for power.

Confucius offered a path back to harmony.

Know your place, serve your community.

Siddhartha Gautama, better known as the Buddha, was born into wealth and privilege in India in the 6th or 5th century BCE.

He was devastated when he learned about the suffering in the world.

He taught that suffering comes from attachment to the ego.

His message was, you are not your title, your wealth, or your ego.

Let it go.

Jesus of Nazareth lived in a time where rigid religious rules had overtaken compassion.

His was a world of power plays, political violence, and deep division.

Christ's call was for more radical love.

Lose your life in order to find it.

Give everything away.

Turn the other cheek.

Love your enemies.

These were all powerful, transformative ideas.

But do these teachings benefit everyone equally?

Confucius, Buddha, and Christ all taught humility, sacrifice, and selflessness.

And those teachings were exactly what the founders and subsequent leaders of those religions needed.

But those founders and subsequent leaders were all men.

Their teachings were made by men and for men.

In Confucianism, women were expected to obey their fathers, then their husbands, then their sons.

Confucius never imagined a woman as a moral agent in her own right.

His vision of harmony depended on women's subordination.

The Buddha's path to enlightenment meant leaving his family, something spiritual men were praised for.

But what would happen if a mother left her children to pursue enlightenment?

That would rarely ever be possible, and if it were, she would be called selfish and unnatural.

And women were excluded from Buddhist monastic life for centuries.

Christianity teaches that

Eve sinned by seeking knowledge that women should submit to their husbands and that women should not be leaders.

For thousands of years, women all across the world have been conditioned to disappear,

to defer, to serve, and to be small.

So when women are handed the spiritual tools of further selflessness, sacrifice, and humility, those tools don't liberate us.

They erase us.

Author Elizabeth Gilbert recently gave a talk about this at the

Archangel Summit about the different spiritual needs of typical men and typical women.

She said that humanity's goal is to move from the profane to the divine.

But those who are socialized to be masculine

and those who are socialized to be feminine require different roads to get

there the profane masculine is putting the wants

and needs of the self above the good of the whole

it's conquering hoarding wealth being power hungry i am the king greedy selfish

and violent it's i'm going to take whatever i want to just

because i can i'm going to take over this country

or have sex with this woman or level this forest

because i want to the divine masculine is putting other people's needs above our own it's kindness forgiveness selflessness

and compassion it's i could hoard resources

but i choose to share i could have power

but i refuse it i look out for the whole instead of just myself the profane feminine over gives,

over serves, is overly selfless, is used and abused.

It's I exist to give and serve.

In the face of bad behavior, I will stay silent and I will continue to please.

I will not ruffle any feathers or make anyone upset.

I look out for the whole at the expense of myself.

Everyone else's needs are prioritized above my own.

It's accommodating others' desires even when resentment is silently oozing out of my eyeballs.

This was me at the Christmas party

and I'll bet it's a lot of women watching right now and maybe a lot of our mothers.

The divine feminine is the protector.

It's standing up in the face of injustice.

It's I will not allow oppression and abuse.

It's holy power, taking up space, speaking up, protecting against wrongdoing, ensuring equity not only for others,

but also for the self.

It's honoring and protecting our own desires rest, and goals.

So the divine feminine starts with putting itself in the center

and then it expands to a circle of protection for everything

that is good and holy and sacred and must not be violated by the profane masculine getting out of hand, right?

Not to allow it, not to enable it, not to be nicer, not to be sweeter, not to be understanding, not to be like,

well he never had a dad himself so he doesn't know.

None of that.

To just be like, oh no, oh no. No, no, no, no, no. That's gone too far.

In sum, in order for the masculine to move from the degraded to the divine, it must give up the self.

In order for the feminine to move from the degraded to the divine, it must build the self.

Unfortunately for women, nearly all major religious traditions were created for the needs of men, taught by men to men using the words of men.

Historically, since religions were speaking exclusively to men, only using masculine tools made sense.

But for the past few centuries, religions have considered themselves universal, covering the needs of both masculine and feminine.

But there's been no change in doctrines or practices to accommodate or speak to women.

Women have been exclusively given the tools of the divine masculine as if they were the only spiritual tools.

Women have evolved with empathy tools hardwired into our bodies.

Women tuning in to the cries of their newborn babies is an evolutionary necessity for the survival of our species.

It's built in.

So when tuning in to the needs of others is further and further and further pushed on us, we just dissolve.

We give ourselves so completely that we can disappear.

It's not the toolkit we need.

And it's why religious tools as they exist now don't work for women.

They were never meant for us.

100

Many women are burnt out from a lifetime of service.

101

And then they can go looking for new age spiritual teachings that tell them that what they need is ego death.

102

But women have spent their whole lives losing their ego.

103

They need to build their ego.

104

Men are conditioned to grow their ego and they need tools to lose it.

105

Britt Hartley from No Nonsense Spirituality has some really important insights on this.

106

Let's hear from her.

107

Women, stop going to male spiritual leaders and gurus to dissolve your ego.

108

These men who have been able to build a strong sense of ego, that they are a person and they take that process for granted,

109

now go into these spiritual spaces to help others experience ego dissolution

110

or ego death in order to give other men the flexibility to not be so ego -driven, which actually really can be progress.

111

But with most women who were raised in patriarchy, you've already had to kind of repress and negotiate your own needs in order to accommodate others.

112

These tools are for people, mostly men, who have already developed and overdeveloped their own ego.

113

So for most of the female clients that I work with who have been raised in patriarchy,

114

the most spiritual thing that you can do is to build your ego, take up space, build your voice, do a project.

115

You're in a place of ego overdevelopment and you are in a place of ego underdevelopment.

116

And so the tools and the path of spirituality will look different.

117

And Oceana Lane also has some really interesting thoughts on this subject.

118

Let's hear what she has to say.

119

I wish I had known this in my late teens,

120

early 20s, which was when I started obsessively going to male gurus to help dissolve my ego and it felt natural.

121

Do you know why?

122

Because my ego was already very fragile because I'm a female and I grew up in a dysfunctional family.

123

So having a male try to break me down just felt really familiar.

124

It took me a long, long time to learn this lesson.

125

Zen Buddhist meditation centers, boyfriends who acted like gurus and they all speak with such authority, it's hard not to believe.

126

Long, grueling meditation retreats where I had to be silent and listen to a man talk while I dissolved into the ether, becoming nothing.

127

My ego was the enemy, and these guys had it all figured out.

128

And I was really good at it.

129

Really, really good at just disappearing, becoming selfless.

130

Almost like I just had like a natural knack for it, you know?

131

These spiritual tools not only don't help women, they barricade her from spiritual progress.

132

Religious tools outlaw the exact things the feminine needs in order to find balance, building and prioritizing the self.

133

In order to even start moving towards balance, women must first hurdle over all of the spiritual tools that we've been given.

134

And this concept applies to more than just religious teachings.

135

The message of most marriage books is similarly to lose the self.

136

According to Goodreads, the most popular marriage books are The Five Love Languages by Gary Chapman, The Meaning of Marriage by Timothy Keller,

137

Love and Respect by Emerson Egerichs, Sacred Marriage by Gary Thomas, and The Seven Principles to Make Marriage Work by John Gottman.

138

These books primarily teach the tools of compassion, forgiveness, empathy, compromise, and kindness.

139

These are great tools.

140

These are essential tools and I promote them wholeheartedly.

141

But I will say that for me personally, those were tools that I already had and that I overused in my marriage.

142

The skills that I needed to develop were to set boundaries and speak up for myself.

143

My friend

144

and co -writer Celeste Davis taught the Seven Principles to Make Marriage Work course for the Gottman Institute for several years.

145

She said that with every passing class, she wished more and more that she could divide the class up

146

and teach the wives separately from the husbands instead of teaching all the marriage tools as if they applied universally.

147

When she taught that compromise and compassion were the foundations of a good marriage, she could see that those were exactly the tools

148

that the husbands needed because they hadn't been taught those skills as they were growing up as boys.

149

She saw how during role plays and in discussions, the men struggled to stop problem solving and start really listening,

150

to compromise, to be compassionate when they were upset, to give up some autonomy for the good of the partnership.

151

But the women didn't need those tools.

152

They had been doing too much compromise, too little prioritizing their own needs, and they were drowning in resentment,

153

they needed to be taught to start paying attention to that resentment, to ask themselves what they really wanted,

154

not just what would keep the peace for everybody else.

155

They needed permission to make room for their desires, even when it meant disappointing their spouse.

156

They needed to be given the tools to be okay in the midst of upsetting someone.

157

In religion and in relationships, women have already been sacrificing.

158

We've already been surrendering.

159

We've already been told our whole lives to think of others first and to put ourselves last.

160

What women need is the opposite message.

161

Your life matters.

162

Your voice matters.

163

Your body, your boundaries, your dreams, they matter.

164

The spiritual work of women is not to dissolve the self it's to recover it to rebuild what has been taken

165

thanks for watching please share this video with the women in your life share it with your mom, your sisters, your girlfriends and

166

if you're like me share these ideas with the younger version of yourself who needed this framework

167

but hadn't learned it yet and of course like and subscribe if you haven't already thank you so much

168

We'll be right back.

169

I'll see you next time.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin

IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid

WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op

WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Scan QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Zelfde Kanaal

Do Women Have Equal Rights Yet?

Teens

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

96 zinnen

Why ‘turning the other cheek’ is fundamentally misunderstood | Bishop Robert Barron

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

54 zinnen

Who decides what is socially “normal”? | Christine Emba

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

249 zinnen

The Jesus Problem

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Why Religious Tools Don't Work For Women”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: tools, ego, spiritual, marriage. Deze video bevat 169 zinnen en 2175 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 14:55. De spreker praat in een gelijkmatig tempo van ongeveer 146 woorden per minuut, prettig om te shadowen. Slechts 81% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

Woord	Uitspraak	Betekenis
spiritual bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈspɪɹɪt͡ʃuəl/	geestelijk, spiritueel
masculine bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈmæskjələn/	mannelijk
divine bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/dɪˈvaɪn/	goddelijk
sacrifice zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈsæk.ɹɪ.faɪs/	opoffering
compromise zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈkɑmpɹəˌmaɪz/	compromis
compassion zelfstandig naamwoord	/kəmˈpæʃ.ən/	medelijden, deernis
founder zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈfaʊ̯n.dəː/	stichter, grondlegger
disappear werkwoord	/dɪsəˈpɪɹ/	verdwijnen, verzwinden
accommodate werkwoord	/əˈkɑməˌdeɪt/	onderbrengen, herbergen
guru zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈɡʊɹ(ˌ)u/	goeroe
resentment zelfstandig naamwoord	/ɹɪˈzɛnt.mənt/	misnoegen, wrok
silent bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈsaɪ̯lənt/	stil
suffer werkwoord	/ˈsʌfɚ/	lijden
subsequent bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈsʌbsɪkwənt/	volgend, daaropvolgend
tune zelfstandig naamwoord	/tjuːn/	melodie

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Woord	Betekenis
give up werkwoord	zich overgeven
write down werkwoord	opschrijven, neerschrijven
figure out werkwoord	uitvogelen, er achter komen
grow up werkwoord	opgroeien
take over werkwoord	overnemen

Zinnen om te herhalen

Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:

It's I exist to give and serve.
Everyone else's needs are prioritized above my own.
It's I will not allow oppression and abuse.
It's not the toolkit we need.
Let's hear what she has to say.

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

Structuur	In de video
Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is	have already been sacrificing · We've already been surrendering
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt	I've heard · have been conditioned · have considered
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet	was born · were made · were expected
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding	those who are · men who have · women who were

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 21 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, I'm, we've. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

De “th”-klanken: empathy /ˈɛmpəθi/, feather /ˈfɛðə/, ether /ˈi.θɚ/
De klanken “sh” en “zh”: compassion /kəmˈpæʃ.ən/, selfish /ˈsɛlf.ɪʃ/, meditation /mɛdɪˈteɪʃn̩/, partnership /ˈpɑɹtnɚʃɪp/, influential /ɪnflʊˈɛnʃəl/
Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: accommodate /əˈkɑməˌdeɪt/, exclusively /ɪkˈskluːsɪvli/, enlightenment /ɪnˈlaɪtənmənt/, humility /hjuːˈmɪlɪti/, spirituality /ˌspɪɹ.ə.t͡ʃuˈæl.ə.tɪ/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: compromise /ˈkɑmpɹəˌmaɪz/, sacred /ˈseɪkɹɪd/, solve /sɒlv/, refuse /ɹɪˈfjuːz/, expand /ɪkˈspænd/
/æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: masculine /ˈmæskjələn/, sacrifice /ˈsæk.ɹɪ.faɪs/, compassion /kəmˈpæʃ.ən/, spirituality /ˌspɪɹ.ə.t͡ʃuˈæl.ə.tɪ/, expand /ɪkˈspænd/
/g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: guru /ˈɡʊɹ(ˌ)u/, forgiveness /fɚˈɡɪvnəs/, hungry /ˈhʌŋ.ɡɹi/, negotiate /nəˈɡəʊ.ʃi.eɪt/, greedy /ˈɡɹiːdi/

Zo oefen je met deze video

Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
Spreek zin voor zin na op normale snelheid en herhaal elke zin tot je ritme gelijk is aan dat van de spreker.
Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als spiritual, masculine, divine.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →

Shadowing Practice: Why Religious Tools Don't Work For Women - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

App downloaden

Do Women Have Equal Rights Yet?

Taoist Wisdom For Inner Peace

Why Didn't Hinduism Spread Beyond India and South-East Asia?

Why Be Catholic and Not Just Christian?

Why Have We Become So Mean?

Stop Playing Small. Go All In.

Are we too Materialistic?

The Modern World Is Designed to Destroy You | Naval Ravikant

4 Key Lessons from Women Who Run With The Wolves by Clarissa Pinkola Estés

HISTORY OF IDEAS - Loneliness

Why ‘turning the other cheek’ is fundamentally misunderstood | Bishop Robert Barron

Who decides what is socially “normal”? | Christine Emba

The Jesus Problem

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Zinnen om te herhalen

Grammatica in deze video

Uitspraak om op te letten

Zo oefen je met deze video

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?