Shadowing Practice: Will YouTube Ever Run Out Of Video IDs? - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

69 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Every YouTube video has a unique ID.
2
It's up there in the URL, a string of 11 characters that uniquely identifies which video you want.
3
Now, YouTube has millions and millions of videos.
4
The last stats that they released said that they have 400 hours of video being uploaded every minute.
5
So, are they ever going to run out of those IDs?
6
Well, to find out, let's talk about counting systems.
7
People count in base ten.
8
Zero to nine.
9
That'll be, hopefully, familiar to you.
10
Computers count in base two, in binary.
11
But that's difficult for humans to read.
12
It gets too long to write really, really quickly.
13
So, often computers will display it in base sixteen.
14
Hexadecimal.
15
You have zero to nine, and then A to F, and then you start adding to the next column.
16
Humans can't understand that easily, but it's efficient if we have to type it in somewhere.
17
And sixteen, two to the power of four, is also easy for computers to deal with.
18
So how about base 64?
19
That'd be a ridiculous counting system, right?
20
Except 64 is another one of those easy numbers for computers.
21
It is 2 to the power of 6.
22
And humans can get to 64 very easily.
23
0 to 9, then capital letters A to Z, then small letters A to Z, and two other characters.
24
Most Base64 uses slash and plus, but they don't work so well in URLs, so YouTube uses hyphen and underscore.
25
That YouTube URL, that unique ID, is really just a random number in Base64.
26
They could have picked Base10 or Base16, but they didn't.
27
They went with 64, because it will let you cram a huge number into a small space
28
and still make it vaguely human-readable.
29
Author and programmer Sam Hughes, by the way, pushed this to the limit and invented base 65,536,
30
which includes basically every character from every language.
31
It is ridiculous and unnecessary, but when has that ever stopped programmers?
32
So, why didn't YouTube just start counting at one and work up?
33
Well, first, they would have to synchronise their counting between all the servers handling the video uploads.
34
Or they'd have to assign each server a block of numbers.
35
Either way, there's a lot of tracking to do, a lot of making sure that it's never duplicated.
36
Instead, they just generate a random number for each video, see if it's already taken, and if not, use it.
37
And secondly, it is a really, really bad idea to just count one, two, three, or so on in URLs.
38
Incremental counters, as they're called, can be a big security flaw.
39
If you see video 283 up there, then you might wonder, what's video 284?
40
Or video 282?
41
It's easy to enumerate, as it's called, to run through the entire list.
42
YouTube unlisted videos, the ones that don't appear publicly, but that you can send a link to people, those wouldn't work.
43
And by the way, lots of badly designed sites do use incremental counters and it is a terrible idea.
44
It might tell your competitors exactly how many customers you have, because they can just count them.
45
It might let people download all your records easily, because they can just run through them.
46
And in one site that someone in Florida emailed me about this week, it lets you look at other people's personal details.
47
Don't use incremental counters.
48
If you're building a website, use a random number.
49
Which brings me to the question, just how big are the numbers that YouTube uses?
50
Well, let's work it out.
51
One character of base 64 lets you have 64 ID numbers.
52
Two characters, that is 64 by 64, or 4096.
53
Three characters, 64 times 64 times 64, or 64 to the power of 3, that is already more than a quarter of a million.
54
And if we go to four, well, now we're above 16 million.
55
If you used base 64, then you can assign an ID number to everyone who lives in London down there twice over,
56
and you'll only need four characters.
57
This gets big fast.
58
We can keep on doing this, and by seven characters, we are already at four quadrillion.
59
Now I assume that YouTube checks through a dictionary and doesn't allow any actual words to appear up there,
60
particularly anything rude, but that is going to be a tiny minority of their URLs, so for our purposes, we can pretty much just ignore that.
61
At YouTube's 11 characters, we are at 73 quintillion 786 quadrillion 976 trillion 294 billion 838 million 206 thousand and 464 videos.
62
That is enough for every single human on planet Earth to upload a video every minute for around 18,000 years.
63
YouTube planned ahead.
64
Can they run out of URLs?
65
Technically, yes.
66
Practically, no. And if they did, they could just add one more character.
67
Oh, one take!
68
One take!
69
Yes!

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: base, character, Youtube, Url, counting. Deze video bevat 69 zinnen en 785 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 5:03. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 156 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 86% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
upload werkwoord/ˈʌpˌloʊd/uploaden
programmer zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈpɹoʊɡɹæmɚ/programmeur
assign werkwoord/əˈsaɪn/toewijzen
enumerate werkwoord/ɪˈn(j)u.məˌɹeɪt/uittellen
hexadecimal zelfstandig naamwoord/ˌhɛksəˈdɛsɪməl/heksadecimale talstelsel
hyphen zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈhaɪ̯.f(ə̯)n̩/afbreekteken, koppelteken
readable bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈɹiː.də.bəl/afleesbaar, leesbaar
synchronize werkwoord/ˈsɪŋ.kɹə.naɪːz/synchroniseren
underscore zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈʌn.dɚˌskoɹ/underscore
vaguely bijwoord/ˈveɪɡli/vaag
uniquely bijwoord/juːˈniːk.li/uniek
invent werkwoord/ɪnˈvɛnt/uitvinden, uitdenken
duplicate werkwoord/ˈd(j)uː.plɪˌkeɪt/dupliceren
flaw zelfstandig naamwoord/flɔ/barst, barstje
competitor zelfstandig naamwoord/kəmˈpɛt.ɪ.tɚ/concurrent, concurent

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
find out werkwoordontdekken, onderzoeken

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 15 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, didn't, can't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: enumerate /ɪˈn(j)u.məˌɹeɪt/, hexadecimal /ˌhɛksəˈdɛsɪməl/, competitor /kəmˈpɛt.ɪ.tɚ/, dictionary /ˈdɪk.ʃəˌnɛ.ɹi/, technically /ˈtɛk.nɪˌkəl.i/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

  • Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: upload /ˈʌpˌloʊd/, synchronize /ˈsɪŋ.kɹə.naɪːz/
  • /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: programmer /ˈpɹoʊɡɹæmɚ/, practically /ˈpɹæk.tɪ.k(ə.)li/
  • /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: programmer /ˈpɹoʊɡɹæmɚ/, vaguely /ˈveɪɡli/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als upload, programmer, assign.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →