Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: The Psychology of Deep Thinkers

If you feel like you're pretty smart,

⏸ Tạm dừng

Tốc độ:

314 câu

Nếu các câu quá ngắn hoặc quá dài, hãy bấm Edit để chỉnh sửa.

If you feel like you're pretty smart,

you've always done pretty well,

like you did well in school,

you understand things more easily when other people struggle with it,

then it probably means that you are a deep thinker.

And when it comes to learning,

this is actually quite rare.

Based on my own surveys and the data that I've collected from tens of thousands of learners,

less than 10% of the population is a naturally deep thinker.

And these are usually the people that are in that top band of performance.

So if you're going through school and you were in the sort of top band,

you know, maybe not the smartest person,

but you know, you're generally better than your average,

and you're able to get through school and uni without really trying that hard,

and there's a decent chance that you are one of these natural deep thinkers.

But one of the really common things that happens with deep thinkers,

especially when it comes to learning, is that they peak.

They peak early, and so over time,

like after university, going into life,

or for some people as they are going through university,

it's harder and harder to stay at that top band.

And you get to this place where you know that you're a capable,

intelligent person, but for some reason you are not really getting the types of results

and the performance that you would have expected yourself to be getting.

And it's not for lack of effort.

You're studying and you're putting in the hours,

but still it's not really enough.

So what happened?

Are you just not that smart?

Did you get less intelligent over time?

Did you truly just peek too early?

The reality is probably you're facing something that I call deep processing tanking.

I see this pretty much universally across all of my natural deep thinkers.

And if that is happening,

then there's something that you can do about it

that unlocks those bottlenecks and allows you to be that natural top performer all over again.

So first I'm going to tell you what deep processing tanking is

and then how you can figure out if it applies to you and if it does apply to you,

what you can do about it.

So, deep processing tanking.

I mean, I've been using the word deep thinker,

but thinking is such a vague term.

We should be a bit more specific.

When I say deep thinker,

I'm talking about someone who takes a piece of information,

learns something new, and they don't just accept it for what it is.

They're not looking at the surface.

They're not just trying to memorize the definition.

They're really thinking about what this means.

They're trying to go beneath the surface,

this is the deep part,

and really connect it with what they already know and other things

that they're learning and really create what in the learning science space we call a schema of knowledge.

So there's this mental model of this topic that's forming,

whether that's an academic topic or something that you're learning for work.

A deep thinker who uses their deep thinking when they're learning,

we call that a deep processor.

The processing is you processing new information.

So there's new information.

this is the stuff

that you're trying to learn you take this in you read

it you you hear it in a video whatever it is

and inside your brain you process it and

if you process this in a deep way you're doing deep processing

and deep processing is really one of the most influential things

that dictates whether someone is a good or bad learner

if you do a lot of surface level processing then you can spend hours

and hours and hours on learning something

and still get pretty bad results a lot of people

if you are a deep processor

that you saw around you like spending all of their time studying always writing lots

and lots of notes and you sort of wonder to yourself why do you need to do

that like why do you need to try

so hard just to understand it and often

if you observe closely enough even after doing all of

that they still don't really get it the reason is

because they're using all of these different techniques

but mentally they're not thinking in the right way and

because they're not thinking in the right way those memories are not forming to a high quality.

Whereas if you're naturally really good at deep processing,

then you don't even need those techniques.

You just think about it.

And as you think about it,

those patterns emerge and that memory just naturally happens to be pretty good.

And so if that is the case,

then there are a few things that we can use to check if that is true or not.

So one of the first things is that if you are a natural deep processor,

you probably have a track record of having pretty good results.

Like I said, going through something like school,

you typically expect that you'll be in that top 20th percentile without really having to try that hard.

When you do put in a little bit of effort,

it's easier to maintain that sort of top 20% performance,

probably even throughout university.

And the only times you really struggle are when things are really hard.

Like there's an enormous amount of volume where you have to learn things to a really deep level.

So a lot of people that enter into medical school,

they feel really hit in the face because they are typically naturally good deep processes.

They do really well in school.

They go into medical school And now they're just surrounded by people that are just like them.

100

And the curriculum is geared for that level.

101

So suddenly now having to study like really,

102

really hard because it's never been that challenging before.

103

But generally speaking, if your deep processing ability is naturally really high,

104

you're going to get good results without trying as hard as most other people.

105

The other way that we can check is if you think a little bit about your actual thought processes.

106

So deep processing is not this abstract term.

107

It defines a pretty predictable set of thought patterns that we know are really effective for learning.

108

So if you are doing proper deep processing,

109

then when you think about what happens in your brain when you're learning something new,

110

you should recognize that you are doing a lot of evaluation.

111

This work gets thrown around a lot and just, you know, lay speak.

112

but when we talk about it in our learning science,

113

evaluation means very specifically creating a value judgment on something.

114

It's taking a piece of information and asking yourself how important do I think this piece of information is?

115

Is it more or less important than this other piece of information?

116

If I told you to rank it,

117

you're having to really make a ordered decision about what comes first, what comes second.

118

So most people when they're learning something new, they don't do that.

119

They're going to, they read a page,

120

they get to the bottom of the page

121

and what they're focused on is just did I understand

122

that whereas

123

if you are naturally a deep processor then as you go through it you're having a lot more thoughts

124

and a lot more questions about

125

that you're asking yourself questions like how important is what I just learned why do I need to know

126

that how would I apply that for my own context

127

or my own problem why did the author choose to explain this thing to me what was the purpose behind

128

that you ask yourself questions like this all the time.

129

You also do a lot of comparison.

130

So you read about a concept and you ask yourself,

131

how is this similar or different to a concept that I've already learned about?

132

You're really actively trying to create analogies and search for how it connects to existing knowledge or other things that you're learning.

133

And again, most people don't actually do this.

134

Most people, when they're learning something,

135

they will just be focused on trying to remember it and trying to just understand what is being said.

136

Their litmus test for whether they're learning it or not is just does this make sense to me?

137

And for someone with really high deep processing,

138

they're using that same does it make sense to me test but the standard is much higher.

139

They're only saying it makes sense to them if they have been able to make it simpler,

140

if they've made it relevant and connected to other things that they've learned,

141

if they've found a way to create an analogy for it.

142

They're saying that until they really see how it connects together

143

and they've made a value judgment on how important it is

144

and they've seen how it is similar or different to something else

145

that they know it doesn't make sense yet and

146

so the natural consequence of this is

147

that deep processes tend to also be naturally a lot more curious

148

and often you see this as a trait

149

that comes through from a young age and obviously it's the fact

150

that they're engaging in these deep thought processes

151

that allows them to get these really good results because these processes are the ones that create really strong,

152

durable, complex memory structures.

153

And so, so far, if you look at these items,

154

you can determine whether you're a deep processor or not.

155

Do you have a track record of getting pretty good results,

156

better than other people with less effort?

157

And when you think about whenever you're learning something new,

158

forget about what technique you're using or what strategy,

159

whether you're using, you know,

160

just writing your notes like any other person or you're doing flashcards or you're highlighting or whatever you're doing.

161

Forget about that.

162

When you just think about what is happening inside your brain,

163

are you making these value judgments pretty much constantly and are you by default tending to make comparisons?

164

And probably, have you also always been a pretty curious person?

165

If the answer to that is yes,

166

then you're probably a naturally high deep processor.

167

But there is also one other symptom of a naturally high deep processor,

168

which is also the problem.

169

And this is what can cause some naturally high deep processors to peak too early.

170

and that is a pretty low or superficial level of learning strategy.

171

Naturally high deep processes and deep thinkers don't tend to have very sophisticated

172

and effective learning methods which is ironic but actually makes a lot of sense.

173

If you are a competitive athlete

174

and you can lift 100 kgs with one hand no problem you don't need perfect technique to lift up five

175

or ten kgs because the majority of people are not like you do not have

176

that really high natural deep processing ability school curriculums

177

and standards university examinations things like this they tend to be geared towards the average person

178

and

179

so for you to do well in those types of situations

180

you don't need any special strategy you can use really any strategy of learning

181

that you want because your brain is habitually thinking deeply about it it doesn't matter

182

and it's this combination that creates deep processing tanking

183

and this is really what is happening with

184

that early peaking issue where you used to be a lot

185

better than you think you are now you probably haven't gotten

186

any dumber you've just reached the limit of the strategies

187

that you're used to using and by the way

188

if you're wondering about whether you do have high deep processing

189

or not and you actually want to have

190

that assessed i do actually have a free quiz

191

that i created where i ask you a bunch of questions it takes a few minutes to do it

192

and then we'll actually do an estimate about 80 to 90 accurate i think on your deep processing level

193

so if you're not quite sure based on what i've told you

194

so far

195

or you also want to assess some of the other dimensions

196

of learning outside of deep processing then you can take a

197

look in the description i'll leave a link for you to

198

do this free quiz now as a learning coach one of the telltale signs

199

that i often see with people that have this deep processing tanking issue is

200

when you look at what happens to their performance

201

during transitions so this is a transition from one tier of challenge to the next tier of challenge

202

so a common transition would be like going from high school to university there's often especially

203

if you're doing like a stem subject medicine especially there's this sudden increase in the difficulty

204

and the volume of learning

205

that you need to do you get another transition from university to workplace again sudden transition of the complexity

206

and the volume that you're responsible for.

207

And so what I see with deep processing tanking is

208

that during these transitions there is a disproportionate increase in the amount of effort

209

that person needs to spend to get the same level of result.

210

This is how you need to think about it.

211

If I draw this graph,

212

time on the x-axis, what happens as you go through school,

213

you know, time passes.

214

What's also happening as time passes is that the level of challenge is also tending to increase.

215

And so your performance, if we draw that on the y-axis,

216

in the early stages tends to just generally increase.

217

And there are three major levers that create this upward trend.

218

That is the amount of time or effort that you're spending,

219

it is the strategy that you're using for learning and there is your natural processing ability.

220

So for most people

221

when the challenge increases over time they start by first putting in more time

222

and effort and so they're able to keep their performance matched

223

and at a certain point

224

when you need to hit a certain level of performance for a certain difficulty of challenge most people

225

because they're not even thinking about strategy at all they reach the limit of time

226

and effort no matter how much time or effort

227

that they put in their performance is not really going up

228

or maybe they're studying as much as they humanly possibly can

229

and it's not improving and at that point their performance is either gonna plateau or it's gonna drop off.

230

Now some people, hopefully you guys because you're watching this video and you hopefully follow my stuff,

231

are aware of this concept of learning strategy.

232

You can actually change the methods that you use

233

so you're getting more return for the time and effort that you're actually spending.

234

So you reach a certain reasonable limit of time and effort

235

that you're willing to to spend and then you change focus on developing your strategy

236

so as your strategies get better you're now able to continue

237

to improve that's the the average person someone with really high

238

deep processing skills they often can just skip this entirely

239

and purely by just adding more time and effort they can just make

240

that go all the way through until they hit some level of challenge

241

that's often significantly more difficult than what they were doing before.

242

And at this point, the gap is exposed.

243

Because they have not improved their strategy since all the way back here.

244

Whereas the average person has been continually improving their strategy all throughout here

245

because that's the only way that they were able to improve during that time.

246

When your deep processing is strong enough,

247

you don't have to think about strategy at all.

248

And before you know it,

249

you're in the middle of the ocean,

250

but you don't know how to swim.

251

Now, this line, this is different for everyone, right?

252

If your deep processing is super,

253

super, super strong, like you are an outlier,

254

you are an anomaly, then this line may just never come for you.

255

And you would be in that sort of just natural top 1%,

256

top 0.1% of performers.

257

For some of you, it happened when you started uni,

258

when you started work, when you got a promotion.

259

You can think about a time in your life where you were really good at things.

260

Things were easy and you can fast forward and at a certain point,

261

it wasn't that easy anymore.

262

You've got to ask yourself,

263

during those two points, did my strategies improve and grow enough to cover the difference in those two conditions?

264

When it went from level three difficulty to level seven,

265

did my strategy also go from level three to level seven?

266

Or did it only go from level three to level four?

267

Now, the good thing is,

268

as you probably already figured out because I'm talking to a bunch of deep thinkers,

269

is that you can actually train your deep processing ability.

270

And you can, if you learn the right strategy, start improving again.

271

And often your ability to improve is much faster than the average person.

272

Because for the average person,

273

the thing that eventually limits them is their deep processing ability.

274

They have great strategies, they're very proactive,

275

but their natural processing habits are still a little superficial.

276

And so rebuilding and unworking and training those habits,

277

that's what takes a really long time.

278

Like one of the unique things about my program,

279

the paid program, is that I teach this skill.

280

Like I train people on that deep processing.

281

And for people that are starting from a really low baseline of deep processing,

282

it takes months or years to get to a point where they're not limited by their deprocessing anymore.

283

If you're already starting from that high baseline,

284

then as soon as you start using strategies that are geared towards how your brain naturally wants to think and learn,

285

you can start seeing improvements in your learning efficiency.

286

That is how good your memory is after learning something,

287

how much content you can cover and how long it takes you to cover that content in literally days or weeks.

288

And it's learning those strategies that's going to take you to that top 1%,

289

top 0.1% of performance.

290

That's what happened with me.

291

Like I said before, I was sort of in that sort of top 20th percentile in high school.

292

And then when I went into university,

293

I had that sudden increase in effort.

294

Like I had to study 20 hours a day to try to enter into medical school

295

because I just had no other tools at my disposal other than time and effort.

296

And then by learning eventually about all these different strategies,

297

I felt that I had somehow become that outlier.

298

I was that person who was sitting there in a lecture just listening to things,

299

reading through books, and I could just remember it.

300

And it's crazy because I remember being on the other side of that.

301

I remember looking at those people and feeling like they're just built different.

302

And in a way, they are because their natural deep thinking is

303

because of their genetics and early childhood experiences that sort of shaped their brain to be that way.

304

So I guess they were built different.

305

but the good thing is that we can continue to rebuild ourselves to be like that.

306

So if you feel like you are a deep thinker who is sort of getting left behind lately,

307

then I would strongly recommend trying to pick up methods and strategies that align with your natural thinking ability.

308

If you want a good place to start,

309

I'd actually recommend checking out this video that I've created on thinking on paper,

310

which is a really, really great strategy that deep processes can often pick up very quickly.

311

As I mentioned, I also have a paid program for those of you that want to go in more depth as well.

312

I'll leave a link to that in the description as well if you want to check it out.

313

But otherwise, thank you so much for watching,

314

and I'll see you next time.

TRENDING

Phổ biến

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?

Shadowing là kỹ thuật học ngôn ngữ có cơ sở khoa học, ban đầu được phát triển cho chương trình đào tạo phiên dịch viên chuyên nghiệp và được phổ biến rộng rãi bởi nhà đa ngôn ngữ học Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Nguyên lý cốt lõi đơn giản nhưng cực kỳ hiệu quả: bạn nghe tiếng Anh của người bản xứ và lặp lại to ngay lập tức — như một "cái bóng" (shadow) đuổi theo người nói với độ trễ chỉ 1–2 giây. Khác với luyện ngữ pháp hay học từ vựng bị động, Shadowing buộc não bộ và cơ miệng phải đồng thời xử lý và tái tạo ngôn ngữ thực tế. Các nghiên cứu khoa học xác nhận phương pháp này cải thiện đáng kể phát âm, ngữ điệu, nhịp điệu, nối âm, kỹ năng nghe và độ lưu loát khi nói — đặc biệt hiệu quả cho người luyện IELTS Speaking và muốn giao tiếp tiếng Anh tự nhiên như người bản ngữ.

ShadowingEnglish.com – Luyện Nói Tiếng Anh Bằng Shadowing

Nói tiếng Anh lưu loát với phương pháp Shadowing — nghe người bản xứ, đọc theo từng câu, rèn phản xạ ngôn ngữ thật sự. Được hàng ngàn người học IELTS tin dùng.

Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: The Psychology of Deep Thinkers

Phổ biến

Bối Cảnh & Nền Tảng

5 Câu Nói Hữu Ích Cho Giao Tiếp Hằng Ngày

Hướng Dẫn Luyện Nói Theo Từng Bước

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?

Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: The Psychology of Deep Thinkers

Tải Ứng Dụng

Bối Cảnh & Nền Tảng

5 Câu Nói Hữu Ích Cho Giao Tiếp Hằng Ngày

Hướng Dẫn Luyện Nói Theo Từng Bước

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?