Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: winning an argument is easy, actually

Chọn chế độ luyện tập

Mỗi chế độ mở một phòng luyện tập toàn màn hình.

202 câu

Nếu các câu quá ngắn hoặc quá dài, hãy bấm Edit để chỉnh sửa.

The easiest way to win an argument is by avoiding it.

The second easiest way to win an argument is by losing it.

The third easiest way to win an argument is by defusing it.

The fourth easiest way is to use logical fallacies plus unethical tactics, and at the bottom of the list,

the hardest way is to actually have good logic.

Those are the five different ways you can approach an argument.

The reason I made this list is because if you ever google how to win an argument,

pretty Pretty much every piece of advice focuses on the bottom two things,

and a lot of it is just mirror their body language or make more eye contact.

But sometimes I doubt how useful that stuff can actually be.

Every method has its own problems.

These three are just easier, they're easy to remember, and they don't take that much effort.

And that is the kind of thing you are here for, hopefully.

Let's start with method number one, avoiding the argument.

Mark Twain once said, never argue with stupid people they will drag you down to their level

and then beat you with experience.

Now I like this advice

because it tells you to be willing to give up on an argument

or to walk away from a potential argument even when you know you're right.

It's just not worth the frustration to argue with someone who just doesn't get it.

But while it's very very easy to walk away from arguments in real life,

in most arguments there is no way to know which one of you is the stupid one.

Both of you each think that you are right and the other person is stupid.

Imagine this, you walk up to a debate and you say 1 plus 1 equals 2.

Your opponent says, well, actually, no, 1 plus 1 equals 1.

You know that you are obviously right.

BlueStickFigure also thinks that they are obviously right.

But just keep in mind, your opponent might not always be stupid.

They might just be misinformed.

You can Google 1 plus 1 and then show them that it equals 2, but they're thinking, Google?

What in the propaganda?

Maybe you're the one that's brainwashed.

It's decent advice to walk away from arguments that aren't helping you, but still, if you avoid every single argument,

you'll end up living inside your own little bubble, and you might miss out on life -changing information from the outside world.

Speaking of life -changing information, let me tell you about the new best way to browse the internet, Brought to you by Opera Browser.

Opera 1 R2 is their brand new futuristic update and it's completely free.

Let me show you.

First of all, the browser opens with the classic theme but you can set it to Aurora, a dark theme, or Midsommar, a light theme.

And each theme is endlessly customizable.

Here's what mine's like.

And if you want to do split screen,

if you want to compare two pages side by side it just takes one second you can just drag

and drop you don't even have to create a new window for it also at any time

if you press ctrl slash it pulls up aria a fully integrated ai feature

that can answer any question it can even summarize

and answer questions about whatever website you're currently on like it's doing right here plus aria can both generate images

and recognize images my favorite feature is being able to pop out a youtube video

and have it play in the corner while I multitask and actually get some work done.

As a bonus, you can even pop out your music player and move it around the screen, allowing you to easily play music while you're browsing.

Opera also has tab islands now, allowing you to effortlessly group tabs based on context.

You can collapse them and expand them whenever you want, like this.

Tab traces is another cool feature.

If you ever forget what tab you were most recently using, it underlines them for you,

with the darker ones being the most recent tabs you used, and all of this is completely free.

Just scroll down to the link in the description to give

Opera a free download and you'll see what I'm talking about.

Now, on to the next method of winning an argument, by losing the argument.

Think about it, in many situations, the point of an argument is not to win, it's not to prove that you're right,

it's to get what you want.

Imagine you lived in a small apartment.

Your roommate leaves out a cookie jar every week for the both of you to share, but after the first month, they confront you.

I put out 20 cookies for the both of us to share, and you took 17 of them.

What is wrong with you?

Now here, it turns out, you actually only took 16.

They counted wrong.

Either way, you still obviously messed up.

And now your roommate probably wants to kick you out, because you don't even pay your half of the rent,

and you don't clean up your spills, and you ride around the apartment in a Segway like it's 2016,

and now you can't even share a cookie jar.

How are you going to argue your way out of this?

Well, you can't use facts and evidence here, because the facts

and evidence here are against

you instead ask yourself what do i actually want out of this argument do i really care about proving

that i actually only took 16 not 17 do i really care about convincing them

that i did nothing wrong is all

that worth it no in fact all i really want is to get my roommate to stop being angry

and to keep leaving out the cookies only focus on the outcome you want

and nothing else don't think about your pride or proving that you're right just think about the outcome.

You could say I took 17 cookies?

Wow, that's terrible.

They were so good, I didn't even realize.

I'm sorry, I promise I don't usually do that.

I won't do it again, and if you really want, I could even buy a separate jar just so it doesn't happen again.

Of course, you're never actually going to buy a separate jar, but to your roommate, this sounds like you really just made an honest mistake,

and you're even willing to go out of your way to make things right.

In fact, your apology was so good, you just made them feel bad for confronting you.

This even applies to situations where you don't think you did anything wrong.

Sometimes instead of trying to prove your innocence you can just apologize and win the argument by losing.

Method number three, diffuse the argument.

What I mean by this is make the argument nicer and calmer and actually try to understand the other person.

If you do this chances are you'll realize that you

and your opponent are not so different and you can finish the argument and come to an agreement pretty quickly.

And this method is more

or less from a guy in history who's apparently really good at winning arguments and his name was Socrates.

Socrates argued with people in public for a living,

and his big theory was that you should go into arguments with the intention of learning new things,

not with the intention of showing how smart you are.

In fact, he's famously quoted as saying, I only know one thing, and that is, I know nothing.

And that's a really good point.

100

Most of the time, the information we have, we don't know for sure that's 100 % true.

101

We're just blindly trusting whatever source we got our information from.

102

I don't even know if this is a real Socrates quote.

103

I got it from a Google image.

104

But if you take nothing else away from Socrates, remember this.

105

Don't misunderstand their argument, and don't let them misunderstand yours.

106

But then, once you understand someone's argument, don't just flat out tell them they're wrong.

107

Instead, try to find little things that you both agree on,

108

one at a time, and then build your way up to agreeing on the main point.

109

This This is how you actually convince people of things.

110

You start by agreeing on small things, and then you work your way up to bigger things until eventually, they change their mind.

111

However, Socrates also had another, more annoying method, called Socratic questioning.

112

This is where you just ask an endless stream of questions to the opponent until they get frustrated and can't explain something.

113

And technically, there is a right way to use this method, but that doesn't really happen in real life situations.

114

Instead, most people who use it just end up flooding their opponent with random unrelated questions that are meant to trip them up.

115

What do you mean why am I mad?

116

You took the last cookie from the jar.

117

Why does it upset you if I took the last cookie?

118

I wanted it.

119

Well, is it not true that I also wanted it?

120

Yeah, but that was your 18th cookie.

121

That's too many.

122

Why exactly do you perceive that as too many?

123

You only let me have two.

124

I had two, you had 18.

125

Would you have perhaps instead preferred if we partitioned the cookies equally?

126

Yeah, half and half.

127

But is it not true that not all resources have to be partitioned equally?

128

Does your boss give the same paycheck to everyone?

129

Or do different people get different paychecks based on their job?

130

That's not the same thing.

131

Can you explain to me why it is not the same thing?

132

This is an example of method number four, which is using unethical tactics.

133

If you're willing to use unethical tactics like most people are socratic questioning is absolutely perfect

134

you just keep asking questions every time the opponent gives a nice sensible answer just brush past it

135

and ask another question there are a bunch of guides on the internet about how to win an argument unethically

136

and they pretty much all require you to use fallacies aka bad logic

137

and then hope the opponent doesn't notice some other guides might tell you to just sit there

138

and wait for your opponent to commit a fallacy so you can interject with,

139

my dude, did you literally just use an ad hominem fallacy against me?

140

After enough times doing this, you will eventually realize your opponent literally does not care that you can name every fallacy in Latin.

141

Instead, I like to take the easy route and just base my arguments off of this old cartoon by Scott Meyer.

142

How to win an argument.

143

First and foremost, pick your battles.

144

Choose a topic nobody has strong opinions on or has given much thought.

145

Make claims that are so outrageous that your opponent will be left sputtering in disbelief rather than refuting your claims.

146

Make them prove their point beyond any possible doubt.

147

When they can't, take it as proof of your point.

148

Later, even if you lost the argument, see that you won.

149

If you really want to get into the advanced techniques, Arthur Schopenhauer once wrote a sarcastic essay exposing how most debates are actually won.

150

I'll go through all of these methods rapidly, just in case you find any of them useful.

151

Number one, exaggerate your opponent's argument to make it sound extreme.

152

Number 2.

153

Take everything your opponent says and then generalize it so that it's easier to attack.

154

Number 3.

155

Ask your opponent a bunch of seemingly unrelated questions until you can get them to contradict themselves.

156

Number 4.

157

Instead of proving something, present it to your opponent as if it were already true.

158

Number 5.

159

Make them angry or attack your opponent's character to put them off their game.

160

Number 6.

161

Ask questions in a random order and jump around from topic to topic to confuse your opponent.

162

7. Frame all of your questions in a way where the opponent has to answer with no. which makes them look super negative.

163

Number eight, use random metaphors to make your argument look better than it actually is.

164

Number nine, even when you lose, say that you were right about the stuff that actually mattered.

165

Number 10, introduce an absurd situation to make your opponent's argument sound ridiculous.

166

Number 11, when your argument is about to be proven wrong, change it to something else.

167

Number 12, frequently interrupt your opponent so that they can't get a word in.

168

Number 13, when your opponent says something, respond with, so basically, you're saying that, and then make some ridiculous conclusion that they never actually talked about.

169

Number fourteen, if you could provide just one counterexample to your opponent's claim, act like that means their claim is completely false.

170

Number fifteen, if your opponent asks you to prove something is true, ask them to prove that it's not true.

171

Number sixteen, if there's an audience, try appealing to the audience's emotions by mentioning their families, or their pets, or their paychecks,

172

or stuff that directly affects them, instead of just talking to your opponent.

173

Number 17.

174

Whenever your opponent makes a strong point, immediately change the subject.

175

Number 18.

176

Make up quotes from authority figures or experts to support your argument.

177

Number 19.

178

Avoid talking about any subject by just saying, I'm not an expert.

179

Number 20.

180

Associate your opponent's claim with something widely disliked, even if it's not actually a fair connection to make.

181

Number 21.

182

When your opponent makes any statement, respond with, Well, that works in theory, but it would never work in real life.

183

Number 22, if you find a weak point in your opponent's argument, keep bringing it up and force them to keep talking about it.

184

Number 23, just be really confident with your argument and pretend that it's really strong, even if it's not.

185

Number 24, use big, complex words that your opponent can't understand.

186

Number 25, if your opponent ever makes a small mistake, pretend

187

that their conclusion is now totally false after hearing all of these methods

188

you might ask is there any actually logical way to win an argument

189

and the answer is yes and you see them all the time

190

and they're usually pretty boring

191

if you've ever written an essay

192

you probably have to have some structure like claim evidence reasoning basically you make a claim

193

and then you provide evidence

194

but you can't just leave it there you have to explain why the evidence actually supports your claim

195

if you can't provide that reasoning chances are, you either need to find better evidence, or you need to adjust your claim.

196

Or, like many academics, you can just give up and elect to implement an excessively convoluted lexicon,

197

replete with labyrinthine phraseology, thereby obfuscating the original intent, to such an extent that decipherability is rendered null.

198

Alternatively, one may acquiesce to the inexorable alert of polysyllabic instructions and sesquipedalian tendencies,

199

thereby engendering a cacophony of lexemic extravagance that transcends the cognitive grasp of the quotidian interlocutor,

200

ultimately achieving a state of semantic opacity so profound

201

that the conceptual underpinning of the dialogue dissipates into an abyss of intellectual perplexity.

202

Anyway, one subscribe provides one donation to fund the next video.

Tải Ứng Dụng

Mọi thứ bạn cần để nói trôi chảy

Chấm điểm AIChấm từng câu nói

Luyện IPAThành thạo mọi âm

Từ vựngMở rộng vốn từ

Game Từ vựngHọc qua chơi

Quét QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

📺 Cùng kênh

✨ Video gợi ý

119 câu

How to Win Every Argument (Even if You Are Wrong)

Business EnglishInterview EnglishDaily Conversation

10 câu

It's easy to lie, It's not easy to live with lies - with @melrobbins

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

287 câu

Brad Pitt & Damson Idris Argue Over The Internet’s Biggest Debates | Agree To Disagree | LADbible

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

156 câu

Unfortunately, YouTube Really Is This Simple

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

27 câu

This 30-Second Trick Solves Every Group Argument

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

40 câu

How to Trick Your Brain Into Liking Discipline???

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

607 câu

Every Argument For Atheism

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

118 câu

How To Never Get Angry Or Bothered By Anyone | Psychology Explained

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

20 câu

The most common couple argument 🤦‍♂️⚡️ | English Conversation #learnenglish

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

269 câu

21 Life-Changing Books Summarized in 18 Minutes

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

Từ vựng và ghi chú luyện nói cho bài học này

Bài luyện nói này dựa trên video “winning an argument is easy, actually”. Những từ được nhắc lại nhiều nhất trong bài: argument, opponent, method. Video này có 202 câu và 2546 từ để luyện shadowing. Phần lời nói dài 13:07. Người nói nói nhanh, khoảng 194 từ mỗi phút, nên sẽ có nhiều chỗ nối âm và nuốt âm. 85% số từ nằm trong 3.000 từ tiếng Anh thông dụng nhất; phần còn lại nên xem trước khi luyện.

Từ vựng quan trọng trong video

15 từ đáng học trong video, kèm phiên âm và nghĩa:

Từ	Phiên âm	Nghĩa
cookie danh từ	/ˈkʊki/	bánh quy, bích quy
argue động từ	/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/	tranh luận
roommate danh từ	/ˈɹu(m)ˌmeɪt/	bạn cùng phòng
topic danh từ	/ˈtɑpɪk/	chủ đề
tactics danh từ	/ˈtæktɪks/	chiến thuật
dragon danh từ	/ˈdɹæɡən/	rồng
conclusion danh từ	/kənˈkluːʒən/	kết thúc
intention danh từ	/ɪnˈtɛnʃn̩/	ý định
convince động từ	/kənˈvɪns/	thuyết phục
essay danh từ	/ˈɛs.eɪ/	tiểu luận
browse động từ	/bɹaʊz/	đọc lướt qua
mirror danh từ	/ˈmiɹɚ/	gương, kiếng
compare động từ	/kəmˈpɛɚ/	so sánh, so
pet danh từ	/pɛt/	thú cưng, vật cưng
introduce động từ	/ˌɪntɹəˈdus/	giới thiệu

Cụm động từ bạn sẽ nghe

Từ	Nghĩa
clean up động từ	quét dọn, quét tước
give up động từ	đầu hàng

Những câu đáng luyện lại

Các câu ngắn, trọn ý trong video mà bạn có thể dùng lại khi giao tiếp hằng ngày:

Let's start with method number one, avoiding the argument.
What is wrong with you?
What do you mean why am I mad?
Why exactly do you perceive that as too many?
Does your boss give the same paycheck to everyone?

Ngữ pháp trong video

Những cấu trúc người nói dùng nhiều nhất, kèm đúng cụm từ trong video:

Cấu trúc	Trong video
Câu bị động be + quá khứ phân từ — nhấn vào việc xảy ra, không phải người làm	be misinformed · are meant · be partitioned
Mệnh đề quan hệ who / which + mệnh đề — thêm thông tin về người hoặc vật	someone who just · people who use · four, which is
Thì hiện tại hoàn thành have/has + quá khứ phân từ — việc đã xảy ra nhưng còn liên quan đến hiện tại	has given · you've ever written

Phát âm cần chú ý

Người nói dùng 50 dạng rút gọn, ví dụ don't, you're, can't. Hãy nói theo dạng ngắn đúng như bạn nghe.

Âm “th”: thereby /ðɛɹˈbaɪ/, unethical /ʌnˈɛθɪkəl/, labyrinthine /ˌlæb.əˈɹɪn.θɪn/
Âm “sh” và “zh”: conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, intention /ɪnˈtɛnʃn̩/, partition /pɑɹˈtɪ.ʃən/, associate /əˈsoʊʃi.ət/, brush /bɹʌʃ/
Từ dài — đặt trọng âm cho đúng: ridiculous /ɹɪˈdɪk.jə.ləs/, associate /əˈsoʊʃi.ət/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/, apologize /əˈpɑləˌd͡ʒaɪz/, technically /ˈtɛk.nɪˌkəl.i/

Những âm người Việt thường gặp khó:

Cụm phụ âm cuối — đọc đủ từng âm, đừng nuốt âm cuối: opponent /əˈpəʊ.nənt/, tactics /ˈtæktɪks/, pretend /pɹəˈtɛnd/, convince /kənˈvɪns/, confront /kənˈfɹʌnt/
Âm /tʃ/, /dʒ/ và /ʒ/ — tiếng Việt không có, đừng đọc thành “ch” hay “gi”: conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, logical /ˈlɑd͡ʒɪkəl/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/, generate /ˈd͡ʒɛn.ə.ɹeɪt/, apologize /əˈpɑləˌd͡ʒaɪz/
Âm /æ/ — mở miệng rộng hơn âm “e”: tactics /ˈtæktɪks/, dragon /ˈdɹæɡən/, tab /tæb/, expand /ɪkˈspænd/, rapidly /ˈɹæpɪdli/

Cách luyện với video này

Nghe hết video một lần, chưa cần nói, và ghi lại những từ bạn chưa biết.
Bắt đầu ở tốc độ 0,75×, nói đuổi từng câu, rồi quay lại tốc độ bình thường khi đã quen.
Ghi âm giọng mình rồi so với bản gốc, chú ý các từ như cookie, argue, roommate.

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?

Shadowing là kỹ thuật học ngôn ngữ có cơ sở khoa học, ban đầu được phát triển cho chương trình đào tạo phiên dịch viên chuyên nghiệp và được phổ biến rộng rãi bởi nhà đa ngôn ngữ học Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Nguyên lý cốt lõi đơn giản nhưng cực kỳ hiệu quả: bạn nghe tiếng Anh của người bản xứ và lặp lại to ngay lập tức — như một "cái bóng" (shadow) đuổi theo người nói với độ trễ chỉ 1–2 giây. Khác với luyện ngữ pháp hay học từ vựng bị động, Shadowing buộc não bộ và cơ miệng phải đồng thời xử lý và tái tạo ngôn ngữ thực tế. Các nghiên cứu khoa học xác nhận phương pháp này cải thiện đáng kể phát âm, ngữ điệu, nhịp điệu, nối âm, kỹ năng nghe và độ lưu loát khi nói — đặc biệt hiệu quả cho người luyện IELTS Speaking và muốn giao tiếp tiếng Anh tự nhiên như người bản ngữ.

Phương pháp shadowing: đọc hướng dẫn từng bước đầy đủ →

Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: winning an argument is easy, actually

Chọn chế độ luyện tập

Tải Ứng Dụng

becoming charismatic is easy, actually

getting lean is easy, actually

avoiding taxes is easy, actually

learning a new language is easy, actually

becoming smart is easy, actually

losing weight is easy, actually

getting a personality is easy, actually

not regretting your life is easy, actually

becoming social is easy, actually

building an app is easy, actually

not being insecure is easy, actually

getting jacked is easy, actually

How to Win Every Argument (Even if You Are Wrong)

It's easy to lie, It's not easy to live with lies - with @melrobbins

Brad Pitt & Damson Idris Argue Over The Internet’s Biggest Debates | Agree To Disagree | LADbible

Unfortunately, YouTube Really Is This Simple

This 30-Second Trick Solves Every Group Argument

How to Trick Your Brain Into Liking Discipline???

Every Argument For Atheism

How To Never Get Angry Or Bothered By Anyone | Psychology Explained

The most common couple argument 🤦‍♂️⚡️ | English Conversation #learnenglish

21 Life-Changing Books Summarized in 18 Minutes

Từ vựng và ghi chú luyện nói cho bài học này

Từ vựng quan trọng trong video

Cụm động từ bạn sẽ nghe

Những câu đáng luyện lại

Ngữ pháp trong video

Phát âm cần chú ý

Cách luyện với video này

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?