跟讀練習: 3 game theory tactics, explained - 通過影片學習英語口語
選擇練習模式
每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。
79 句
如果句子過短或過長，請點選 Edit 進行調整。
1
Any time that you're interacting with another person who has their own interests and is trying to achieve their own ends, they are trying to do the best they can, given what they want.
2
You're trying to do the best you can, given what you want.
3
And so you're interacting in a strategic situation.
4
Game theory is a mathematical theory that attempts to make sense of how it is that people interact in these strategic situations.
5
John von Neumann wrote a very important book called The Theory of Games with a guy named Oscar Morgenstern.
6
And in there he laid out game theory.
7
Game theory is the study of decision making under conditions of uncertainty over time.
8
It was originally developed in economics in order to try and understand economic behavior, like why people buy certain things or why they're willing to work for certain wages.
9
But later on it was expanded and applied to a variety of different situations including biology,
10
international relations, and even interpersonal relations like friendship and parenting and family relations.
11
One of the things that game theory has really shown us through recent study has been interactions
12
that we oftentimes think as zero-sum or competitive are not as competitive as they seem.
13
In situations like in the Cold War, which most people thought, that's got to be a zero-sum game if anything is,
14
we discovered that actually there were opportunities for mutual cooperation.
15
Arms reduction treaties are a great example.
16
The U.S and the USSR figured out that if they could find a way to cooperate, they could both save an enormous amount of money and effort by reducing the number of weapons that they have.
17
Reagan and Gorbachev negotiated the START treaty with one another.
18
And one of the big problems that they had is, how can you be sure that while you're eliminating nuclear weapons, your adversary is also eliminating nuclear weapons?
19
So rather than saying, we're just going to get rid of some large percentage of our nuclear weapons
20
and hope that the USSR would do so as well, they broke up the interaction into a bunch of little tiny ones.
21
So the USSR would eliminate just a few nuclear weapons, then the US would eliminate just a few nuclear weapons.
22
They would check, and then they would go on to the next stage.
23
And then each would eliminate a few more, and they'd go on to the next stage.
24
This process of taking a big interaction
25
and breaking it down into little small parts can change a bad social dilemma into a positive interaction.
26
What I do in my personal life, and I think almost everyone can do in their personal life, is to try and think, in this interaction, what outcome would be good for both parties?
27
And how can we achieve that outcome?
28
And by thinking about everything in that way, we oftentimes transform something that seems like a situation where there has to be a winner
29
and there has to be a loser into one where nobody feels like they've lost and everybody benefits.
30
JOHN VAN NORMANN based game theory on a stripped-down version of poker.
31
In any given poker situation, you're dealing with a lot of uncertainty
32
and it's all about how to make the best decision in any given moment and that's so integral to life.
33
Everything we try to do, you know, should we take this route or that route, should I go here on vacation or there, it's all about dealing with uncertainties and probabilities of things happening
34
and poker is a very fun and easy way to teach someone how to do that.
35
First rule of thumb is how to extract the most money
36
or chips from your opponent when you have a strong hand
37
and how to lose the minimum when you have a weak hand.
38
You're never going to be 100% certain where you are, are you beating them or do you have a worse hand.
39
So you have to sort of construct a strategy that is mathematically optimal in each situation.
40
The most damaging bias that can come up in poker, and I also think very often in life, is the sunk cost fallacy.
41
Where you'll have a lot of chips, perhaps almost all of your stack is in the middle,
42
and yet you are 85 to 90 percent confident that you have the worst hand.
43
Putting another chip in the pot is probably not a good idea, but we'll often go to ourselves, Ah, well, I've gone this far, I've put this much in, I might as well see it through to the end.
44
But if you have very strong information that actually from this point onwards, putting more money in the pot is a bad idea, then you shouldn't.
45
But we have this belief that, well, I've put this much time in or this much effort, that we should continue on.
46
That can be very, very costly.
47
Once you start paying attention to the sunk cost fallacy, once it's on your radar, you'll probably notice at least a few things that you wish you were doing differently.
48
Those might be small scale.
49
In my case, I'm now much more willing to abandon a book
50
that I've realized I'm not enjoying and not getting any value out of,
51
rather than trudging dutifully through the remainder of the book just because I've already come 100 pages.
52
These changes might also be large scale.
53
For example, I was in a PhD program and at a certain point
54
realized with increasing certainty that I wasn't happy in this field and would probably be better off switching.
55
And that the only reason
56
that I had stuck with it as long as I had was
57
because of my fear of confronting the sunk cost of four to five years
58
that I'd spent preparing for and working in the PhD.
59
And sometimes it really does take time to fully acknowledge to yourself
60
that you don't have any good reason to stick with the job
61
or PhD or project that you've been working on so long because sunk costs are painful.
62
But at least having the sunk cost fallacy on your radar means
63
that you have the opportunity at least to push past that
64
and make the choice that instead will lead to the better outcomes for your future.
65
Game theory spent much of its early days analyzing zero-sum games where one party is going to win
66
and the other party is going to lose and trying to figure out what's the best strategy.
67
What game theorists have figured out is
68
that in zero-sum games the best strategy to pursue
69
when you're against a sophisticated opponent is to adopt the strategy which minimizes your maximum loss.
70
This is sometimes called the mini-max strategy.
71
So the idea is you think, what's the worst case scenario for me?
72
What could my opponent do that would make me worse off?
73
And then you figure out what's the best strategy against that.
74
So you're minimizing your maximum loss.
75
Game theorists prove that if you use this way of thinking, minimizing your maximum loss, you ensure that no matter how sophisticated your opponent is,
76
you've guarded against the worst case scenario.
77
And not only that, but in zero-sum games, you've done the best you can possibly do.
78
Get smarter, faster, with videos from the world's biggest thinkers.
79
To learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get BigThink Plus for your business.
同頻道
C13
The shock of doing nothing | Andrew Holecek
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
How many people are in hell? | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
Why schools of the future will be designed with geneticists | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C14
Why sex, food, and shelter aren’t enough for Homo Sapiens | Agustín Fuentes
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Evolution explains kindness—even when it kills us | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Become a great strategic thinker | Ian Bremmer
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C16
Kids don’t always make you happier. Here’s why people have them anyway. | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Where is the evidence for God? | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
Supernatural thinking: Your brain’s anti-anxiety mode | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
A mind-blowing explanation of symmetry | Frank Wilczek for Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
How evolution works, in 54 minutes | Sean B. Carroll: Full Interview
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
Mindfulness isn’t the only powerful mental state | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Why ‘turning the other cheek’ is fundamentally misunderstood | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
What kind of atheist are you? | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C185
What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
How do elite performers automate their habits? | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B25
Hit peak performance with the power of habit | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
Why I’m against empathy | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
The famous tree-falling thought experiment has a new answer | Lisa Feldman Barrett
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
12 traits emotionally intelligent people share (You can learn them) | Daniel Goleman for Big Think+
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU
推薦影片
C11
583 句
Game Theory #1: The Dating Game
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
260 句
Quick Thinks: Network Smarter and Make Better Connections
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
406 句
#03 Strategic Types of Human Resources Management
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
50 句
International Trade Explained
IELTS PrepBusiness EnglishUniversity Students
C11
106 句
9 Mental Models You Can Use to Think Like a Genius
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C18
39 句
Why We Should Refuse to Get Into Arguments
British AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C1480 句
Everything Valuable from an MBA in 25 minutes
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
734 句
實戰練英文｜再不停，人類要滅了？！黃仁勳痛批 AI 末世論，川普突然 CALL-IN 亂入，大罵這個陰謀只會讓美國輸！｜Nvidia、All-In Summit｜長文、註解、大字版、中英對照
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
77 句
The 6 Disciplines of Strategic Thinking | Michael Watkins
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
81 句
Turing & The Halting Problem - Computerphile
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
41 句
Mathematical Statistics and the Theory of Probability in Casinos
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C188 句
Power: Why Some People Have It and Others Don't
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
本節課學習要點
通過本節課，你將練習如何清晰表達複雜概念（如博弈論策略），同時提升在英語口語中分析性內容的組織能力。影片內容涵蓋博弈論的基本定義、實際應用及核心策略，非常適合用於雅思口語練習中的邏輯思維訓練。你可以結合shadowing site的方法，模仿影片中的語速和語調，增強口語表達的流暢性與說服力。
核心詞彙與短語
- 博弈論（Game theory）：研究策略性互動決策的數學理論
- 零和博弈（Zero-sum game）：一方收益必然導致另一方損失的情境
- 最小最大策略（Minimax strategy）：通過最小化最大損失來制定策略
- 沉沒成本謬誤（Sunk cost fallacy）：因已投入成本而繼續堅持無價值的行為
- 戰略情境（Strategic situation）：多方為實現自身目標而互動的場景
Shadowing練習技巧
影片講解語速中等，邏輯嚴謹，適合作為shadow speak練習素材。練習時，建議先逐句跟讀，重點關注長句的斷句（如“博弈論是一種數學理論，試圖理解人們在這些戰略情境中的互動方式”），模仿說話者的重音位置（通常落在核心概念上，如“ mutual cooperation ”）。對於“沉沒成本謬誤”這類複雜術語，可通過重複跟讀強化發音準確性。此外，影片中對案例的分析（如冷戰軍備條約）包含大量因果邏輯表達（“因為……所以……”“通過……方式”），可著重練習此類句式，提升口語中的邏輯連貫度。堅持使用shadowspeaks方法，每天練習15分鐘，可有效改善英語口語的流暢性與表達精度。
影片中的語法
說話人最常用的結構，並附上影片中的原話：
| 結構 | 影片中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事 | has really shown · they've lost · I've gone |
| 被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼，而不是誰做的 | was expanded · is sometimes called |
什麼是跟讀法？
跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧，最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓，並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大：您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同，跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性，語調，節奏，連讀，聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。