跟读练习: Why The War on Drugs Is a Huge Failure - 通过视频学习英语口语
选择练习模式
每种模式都会打开全屏练习室。
64 句
如果句子过短或过长,请点击 Edit 进行调整。
1
Over 40 years ago, US President Richard Nixon declared drug abuse public enemy number one, starting an unprecedented global campaign, the War on Drugs.
2
Today, the numbers are in.
3
The War on Drugs is a huge failure, with devastating unintended consequences.
4
It led to mass incarceration in the US; to corruption, political destabilization, and violence in Latin America, Asia, and Africa; to systemic human rights abuses across the world.
5
It negatively affected the lives of millions of people.
6
All of this while we waste billions of dollars every year only to create and fuel powerful drug cartels while the goal of the War on Drugs seems less achievable than ever: a world without drugs.
7
How could this happen?
8
The core strategy of the War on Drugs is “no drugs, no problems”.
9
So almost all of the efforts in the last few decades have been focused on eradicating the supply of drugs and incarcerating drug traffickers.
10
But this ignores the most fundamental of market forces, supply and demand.
11
If you reduce the supply of anything without reducing the demand first, its price goes up.
12
This might lower sales for many products, but not for drugs.
13
The drugs market is not price-sensitive.
14
Drugs will be consumed no matter what they cost.
15
So the effect is to encourage production of more drugs and recruitment of more traffickers, which increases availability.
16
This is also known as the balloon effect: even if drug production or a major supply route is destroyed, the supply for the end user is not reduced.
17
A perfect example of this is crystal meth.
18
The US Government tried to stop its production by strictly regulating the sale of chemicals used to manufacture the drug.
19
This forced big meth producers out of business, but the unintended consequences were that thousands of small-scale operations started all over the country, mostly in small towns and rural communities, using chemicals that weren’t regulated.
20
In response to this, some US states wanted to reduce the supply of home-grown meth by regulating even more chemicals, which reduced small-scale meth production drastically.
21
But the supply of meth still stayed the same.
22
Mexican drug cartels immediately took over and opened big production operations.
23
Their meth was even better than it was before, and they had lots of experience in smuggling.
24
So all these efforts made meth production more professional, the drug more potent, while supply wasn’t reduced at all.
25
You can’t win this war on the supply side.
26
Not only are drugs widely available, demand unbroken, and some drugs purer than in the past, with a budget of around $30 billion, the US Drug Enforcement Agency has an efficiency rate of less than 1% when it comes to stopping the flow of drugs into the US and inside the US.
27
For many minors around the world, it’s as easy to get illegal drugs as alcohol.
28
But it doesn’t stop here.
29
Prohibition may prevent a certain amount of people from taking drugs, but in the process it causes huge damage to society as a whole.
30
Many of the problems we associate with drug use are actually caused by the war against them.
31
For example, prohibition makes drugs stronger.
32
The more potent drugs you can store in as little space as possible, the more profit you’ll make.
33
It was the same during alcohol prohibition, which led to an increased consumption of strong liquor over beer.
34
The prohibition of drugs also led to more violence and murders around the world.
35
Gangs and cartels have no access to the legal system to settle disputes, so they use violence.
36
This led to an ever-increasing spiral of brutality.
37
According to some estimates, the homicide rate in the US is 25–75% higher because of the War on Drugs.
38
And in Mexico, the country on the frontline, an estimated 164,000 have been murdered between 2007 and 2014, more people than in the war zones of Afghanistan and Iraq in the same period, combined.
39
But where the War on Drugs might do the most damage to society is the incarceration of non-violent drug offenders.
40
For example, the United States, one of the driving forces of the War on Drugs, has 5% of the world’s total population, but 25% of the world’s prison population, largely due to the harsh punishments and mandatory minimums.
41
Minorities suffer because of this especially.
42
African Americans make up 40% of all US prison inmates.
43
And while white kids are more likely to abuse drugs, black kids are 10 times more likely to get arrested for drug offenses.
44
OK, but is there actually something different we could do?
45
Is there a way out of this mess?
46
In the 1980s, Switzerland experienced a public health crisis related to heroin use.
47
HIV rates skyrocketed and street crime became a problem.
48
Swiss authorities tried a new strategy: harm reduction.
49
They opened free heroin maintenance centers, where addicts would be treated and stabilized.
50
Here, people would be given free heroin of high quality, they would get clean needles and have access to safe injection rooms, showers, beds, and medical supervision.
51
Social workers help them find housing and deal with other problems in their lives.
52
The results were a sharp drop in drug-related crime and two thirds of the people in the centers got regular jobs, because now they could focus on getting better insetad of financing their addiction.
53
Today, over 70% of all heroin addicts in Switzerland receive treatment.
54
HIV infections have dropped drastically.
55
Deaths from heroin overdoses have dropped by 50%.
56
And drug-related street sex work and crime has been reduced enormously.
57
So there are methods that are not only way cheaper, but also actually work, instead of creating more problems.
58
Drug prohibition led to a system that bulldozes human rights, costs vasts sums of money, and creates a lot of human misery, all in pursuit of an unobtainable goal.
59
After 40 years of fighting, it’s time to finally end the War on Drugs and move on to something better.
60
This video was supported by the Open Society Foundations and by viewer donations on Patreon.
61
If you want to learn more about how you can influence drug policy, check out the Stop the Harm campaign.
62
We finally have some merchandise!
63
If you want your own Kurzgesagt poster, T-shirt, mug, or stickers of little monsters, you can get them now at the DFTBA store!
64
Subtitles by the Amara.org community
同频道
FOR YOU
推荐视频
本课的词汇与口语要点
这段视频共有 64 个句子、1056 个单词可供跟读。 讲话部分时长为 6:26。 说话人语速自然,每分钟约 164 个词,接近日常对话。 84% 的单词属于英语最常用的 3,000 词,其余的词建议在练习前先学一下。
视频中的重点词汇
视频中 15 个值得学习的单词,附发音和释义:
| 单词 | 发音 | 释义 |
|---|---|---|
| prohibition 名词 | /ˌpɹoʊ(h)ɪˈbɪʃən/ | 禁止 |
| heroine 名词 | /ˈhɪɹoʊɪn/ | 女英雄, 女主角 |
| regulate 动词 | /ˈɹɛɡ.jə.leɪt/ | 調節 /调节 |
| cartel 名词 | /kɑɹˈtɛl/ | 卡特爾 /卡特尔 |
| harm 名词 | /hɑːm/ | 損害 /损害 |
| estimate 名词 | /ˈɛs.tɪ.mət/ | 估計 /估计 |
| consequence 名词 | /ˈkɑn.sɪ.kwəns/ | 後果 /后果, 結果 /结果 |
| addict 名词 | /ˈæd.ɪkt/ | 上癮的人 /上瘾的人 |
| vast 形容词 | /væst/ | 浩大 |
| ignore 动词 | /ɪɡˈnɔː/ | 無視 /无视, 忽略 |
| sharp 形容词 | /ʃɑɹp/ | 銳利 /锐利, 尖銳 /尖锐 |
| sensitive 形容词 | /ˈsɛn.sɪt.ɪv/ | 敏感 |
| violent 形容词 | /ˈvaɪ.ə.lənt/ | 暴力, 強烈 /强烈 |
| encourage 动词 | /ɪnˈkʌɹ.ɪd͡ʒ/ | 鼓勵 /鼓励, 激勵 /激励 |
| suffer 动词 | /ˈsʌfɚ/ | 受苦, 遭受 |
视频中出现的短语动词
| 单词 | 释义 |
|---|---|
| check out 动词 | 退房 |
| go up 动词 | 上昇 /上升, 上去 |
| take over 动词 | 接管, 接手 |
视频中的语法
说话人最常用的结构,并附上视频中的原话:
| 结构 | 视频中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 被动语态 be + 过去分词 — 强调发生了什么,而不是谁做的 | will be consumed · is also known · weren't regulated |
| 现在完成时 have/has + 过去分词 — 过去发生但与现在仍有关联的事 | have been · have been murdered · have dropped |
需要注意的发音
说话人用了 5 次缩略和弱读形式,例如 can't, doesn't, wasn't。请按听到的简短形式来说。
- “sh” 和 “zh” 音: prohibition /ˌpɹoʊ(h)ɪˈbɪʃən/, sharp /ʃɑɹp/, associate /əˈsoʊʃi.ət/, reduction /ɹɪˈdʌk.ʃən/, efficiency /ɪˈfɪʃ.ən.si/
- 长单词——注意重音位置: prohibition /ˌpɹoʊ(h)ɪˈbɪʃən/, minority /maɪˈnɒɹ.ɪ.ti/, associate /əˈsoʊʃi.ət/, efficiency /ɪˈfɪʃ.ən.si/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/
如何用这段视频练习
- 先完整听一遍视频,不要开口,记下不认识的单词。
- 先用 0.75 倍速逐句跟读,熟练之后再回到正常速度。
- 录下自己的声音并与原声对比,特别注意 prohibition, heroine, regulate 这类单词。
什么是跟读法?
跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧,最初开发用于专业口译员的培训,并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大:您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同,跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性,语调,节奏,连读,听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。
































