تدريب Shadowing: 3 grammar rules that you don’t need to follow anymore - Arika Okrent - تعلم التحدث بالإنجليزية مع YouTube

In 1954, Winston Cigarettes launched an ad so controversial, broadcasters refused to say it on the air.

⏸ متوقف مؤقتاً

السرعة:

51 جمل

إذا كانت الجمل قصيرة أو طويلة جدًا، انقر على Edit لتعديلها.

In 1954, Winston Cigarettes launched an ad so controversial, broadcasters refused to say it on the air.

But the uproar had nothing to do with the dangerous product being advertised.

People were appalled by the ad's grammar, specifically using like as a conjunction instead of as.

Grammatical incidents like this have caused outrage in various regions and languages for centuries.

But while we know people take grammar seriously, what's less clear is why.

Where do these seemingly random rules come from, and which, if any, actually matter?

The answers to these questions vary from rule to rule.

So let's look at three particularly famous English examples.

First up, the idea that you should never end a sentence with a preposition.

Prepositions are small, common words like with, on, for, or to that often come before nouns.

So, for example, a grammar stickler would consider, where does this rule come from,

incorrect, preferring instead, from where does this rule come?

This rule comes from 18th century England, when etiquette was all the rage.

And amidst countless guides on how to act properly, grammarians flooded the market with books on how to speak properly.

Many of the rules in these guides were taken from Latin, a language that was commonly used for written scholarship.

But no one had spoken Latin conversationally in 1,000 years, and imposing its rules on speech was awkward, to say the least.

The rule to never strand a preposition without a noun was one such revived relic.

And while the scholars who proposed it presented the idea as a stylistic choice, subsequent writers turned their suggestion into a hard rule.

Other rules have origins that are perhaps less arbitrary, but significantly more petty.

Consider the idea that you should use fewer when referring to countable nouns,

like water models, and less when referring to nouns we don't count, like water.

This rule comes from another 18th-century grammarian called Robert Baker,

who, for reasons unknown, believed less was inelegant when used with countable nouns.

This might seem strange, but people today wage similar wars on so-called lesser language, such as like or literally.

Besides, Baker's preference was part of a larger craze for codifying English.

For centuries after the Norman conquest in 1066, French was the language of nobility in England, while English was seen as the language of commoners.

While the English had long reclaimed their kingdom by Baker's time, this insecurity lingered in the hearts of many English grammarians.

In fact, Baker also wanted King George to establish an Academy of Letters, with 50 officials to protect the English language.

That's 10 more officials than were employed in France's grammar guard, l'Académie Française.

Many English grammar rules have similarly silly origins, such as efforts to distinguish over from more than,

or our attachment to Latin plurals like fungi and formulae.

The stakes of all these grammatical debates are mostly academic.

But one frequently discussed rule does have some real-world consequences.

For centuries, they has been used in classic literature and everyday speech as both a plural and a singular pronoun.

And today, many non-binary and transgender individuals prefer to use they-them as singular pronouns to refer to themselves.

Nineteenth-century grammarians, however, believed that they should be an exclusively plural pronoun.

Furthermore, in cases where they could be used as a singular pronoun, they argued the word should be swapped for the generic he.

This was an obviously patriarchal decision,

and during the 1970s, activists eventually convinced some usage guides to begin using he or she.

But today, this quibble continues to cause confusion.

Even though most official grammar guides have accepted they as both a singular and plural pronoun.

This isn't the first time we've had this kind of pronoun predicament.

For centuries, you was also considered an exclusively plural pronoun.

And yet today, it's completely accepted in singular situations.

And that's because grammar isn't a hard science.

something we all build together to reflect the people using it.

So however strange a rule's origins may be, the usage we choose to respect today is far from arbitrary.

If you love learning, subscribe to our channel.

Every week, we publish new videos on everything from the history of the world according to cats to how to be a better listener.

Stay tuned and stay curious.

Bye.

ما هي تقنية التظليل الصوتي؟

التظليل الصوتي (Shadowing) تقنية تعلم لغة مدعومة علمياً، طُورت أصلاً لتدريب المترجمين الفوريين المحترفين. الطريقة بسيطة لكنها قوية: تستمع لصوت إنجليزي أصلي وتكرره فوراً بصوت عالٍ — كظل يتبع المتحدث بتأخير 1-2 ثانية. تُظهر الأبحاث تحسناً كبيراً في دقة النطق والتنغيم والإيقاع وربط الأصوات والاستماع والطلاقة.

☕ اشترِ لنا قهوة

يظل ShadowingEnglish مجانيًا بنسبة 100% بفضل دعمكم. تكاليف الخوادم والذكاء الاصطناعي مرتفعة — قهوتكم تبقينا مستمرين! 🙏

التبرع عبر PayPal

ShadowingEnglish.com – تمرين التظليل الصوتي للإنجليزية

تحدث الإنجليزية بطلاقة باستخدام تقنية التظليل الصوتي. استمع لفيديوهات يوتيوب الأصلية، كرر جملة بجملة، وابنِ نطقاً حقيقياً وطلاقة — يستخدمها متعلمو IELTS حول العالم.

تدريب Shadowing: 3 grammar rules that you don’t need to follow anymore - Arika Okrent - تعلم التحدث بالإنجليزية مع YouTube

لماذا يجب ممارسة التحدث مع هذا الفيديو؟

القواعد والتعبيرات في السياق

فخاخ النطق الشائعة

ما هي تقنية التظليل الصوتي؟

تدريب Shadowing: 3 grammar rules that you don’t need to follow anymore - Arika Okrent - تعلم التحدث بالإنجليزية مع YouTube

تنزيل التطبيق

لماذا يجب ممارسة التحدث مع هذا الفيديو؟

القواعد والتعبيرات في السياق

فخاخ النطق الشائعة

ما هي تقنية التظليل الصوتي؟