쉐도잉 연습: Do we Need Nuclear Energy to Stop Climate Change? - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

레슨 만드는 중...
1
Do we need nuclear energy to stop climate change?
2
More and more voices from science, environmental activists and the press have been saying so in recent years.
3
But this comes as a shock to those who are fighting against nuclear energy and the problems that come with it.
4
So, who's right?
5
Well, it's complicated.
6
To slow rapid climate change, the world needs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero.
7
In 2018, three -quarters of global emissions were released through energy production, namely by burning fossil fuels.
8
Energy is a broad term that describes all sorts of stuff, from moving things and people around, to putting things big and small together, or heating our homes.
9
Currently, 84 % of the world's primary energy comes from fossil fuels, 33 % from oil, 27 % from coal, and 24 % from gas.
10
Around 10 % of the global oil supply is just used to burn in boilers to make our homes cozy and warm.
11
Only about 16 % of global energy is from low emission sources, almost 7 % from hydroelectric, 5 % from solar, wind,
12
bioenergy, wave, tidal and geothermal combined, and about 4 % from nuclear.
13
So we pretty much rely on coal, oil and gas to keep our civilization going, which means it's actually very hard to transition away from them.
14
To have a chance of escaping fossil fuels without throwing humanity back into the Stone Age,
15
one of the most impactful things we can do is to electrify as many sectors as possible.
16
Electricity is the stuff that appears like magic when you plug something into a socket so you can watch YouTube.
17
Every industry that can switch from burning fossil fuels to electricity needs to do so, from electric cars to electric heaters.
18
Why do we need to bet so hard on electricity?
19
Because we can produce electricity with low -emission technologies like solar, wind or nuclear.
20
So electricity is a real lever for a radical transition.
21
But there are a few problems making this transition really hard.
22
First of all, in most places in the world, electricity is still generated mostly by burning fossil fuels.
23
And not only that, in the last 20 years, the world's electricity usage increased 73 % in absolute terms.
24
While we are installing renewables at record speeds, at the same time, the amount of fossil fuel we're burning for electricity still keeps rising year by year.
25
Renewables have so far not been able to catch up with the demand for new electricity, and so despite our progress,
26
emissions from electricity are still rising worldwide worldwide.
27
The other alternative to fossil fuels is nuclear, and even though it's not renewable, its greenhouse gas emissions are tiny compared to burning stuff.
28
But in the last 20 years, nuclear has basically stagnated.
29
Countries like China, India, and South Korea built new reactors, while Germany and Japan have been actively taking their nuclear plants offline.
30
Which seems a bit weird
31
if we look at the countries with the most low -carbon electricity in the world
32
that get most of their juice mainly from two sources nuclear or hydropower.
33
Take France and Sweden.
34
In France only around 10 % comes from fossil fuels
35
while 67 % comes from nuclear and 23 % from renewables primarily hydro.
36
In Sweden almost 30 % comes from nuclear power and about 45 % from hydro.
37
So we know that nuclear energy can work at scale.
38
On the technical side, because of the lack of investment and innovation in the last few decades,
39
the majority of the world's nuclear reactors are pretty old technology that's very costly to replace.
40
In most Western countries, building nuclear reactors has become very expensive for a variety of reasons, like a loss of know -how in constructing them,
41
policy changes and increased regulatory constraints so it can take a decade or longer just to finish a power plant.
42
In contrast, countries like South Korea, China, India, and Russia are able to build new nuclear reactors comparatively quickly and at a competitive cost.
43
Still, generally in the West, the current generation of nuclear power plants are more expensive to build and maintain than most fossil fuel alternatives.
44
There are also the concerns about nuclear waste and the fear of accidents, but we cover those in other videos in more detail.
45
We have designs for nuclear reactors that solve many of their problems, namely small reactors that take less time and money to get started.
46
There are also next generation technologies that can already turn radioactive waste into new fuel,
47
but so far these have not been deployed at a scale where they can have a significant impact on the nuclear sector.
48
Considering these uncertainties, some argue that nuclear power is a dangerous relic of the past
49
and that we should just let it go and focus on renewables.
50
But while renewables undoubtedly are the future of electricity,
51
they still have their own huge challenges to overcome before they can take over the vast majority of the electricity grid.
52
The main problem is reliability and consistency.
53
It's not always windy and the sun doesn't always shine especially in the mornings and evenings when humans need the most electricity.
54
The variations between seasons don't make this issue easier.
55
To make renewables reliable
56
and not risk blackouts we need massive storage capacities where we can save energy collected
57
when the sun or wind are at their peak and release it later when we actually need it.
58
Until this is possible other sources of electricity need to provide a controllable load
59
that creates the reliability of supply that our civilization needs to run properly.
60
Eventually, we will be able to do this with renewables, but we need a lot of batteries or storage power plants.
61
Right now, we simply don't have the tech and the capacities to make this transition fast enough to replace fossil fuels.
62
But even if we could, there's another aspect we have to take into account.
63
We're not just trying to kick fossil fuels out of electricity, we're trying to replace energy with electricity.
64
If we're going to electrify sectors that currently use fossil fuels,
65
like cars or heating, we will need significantly more electricity than we're currently using everywhere around the world.
66
And if the electricity needs of the world population continue to grow as they have over the last 20 years, we'll need even more.
67
It all comes down to one thing.
68
No energy source is perfect, all have their own unique problems.
69
Both renewables and nuclear energy require time, investment and technological innovation.
70
On their own, neither is ready to remove fossil fuels from our electricity grid, although activists on both sides claim that they are.
71
In the end, the question is how we want to deal with all these challenges.
72
Should we give up nuclear immediately and at least temporarily accept higher emissions?
73
Will we try to extend the life of current nuclear reactors and shut them down afterwards while solving the shortcomings of renewables?
74
Or will we invest in new nuclear technology to get new nuclear reactor types that are cheaper and safer?
75
Or will we maybe do both?
76
Opinion part starts here.
77
Considering the risks that climate change poses for the biosphere
78
and humanity any technology
79
that has a chance of contributing to a solution should be pursued that's just good risk management and strategy
80
if preventing rapid climate change as quickly as possible is our
81
goal it might be a good idea to see nuclear
82
and renewables not as opponents but as partners we know there's no time to waste
83
so we should keep all of our low emission players on the field as things are both nuclear
84
and renewables need innovation and investment but But if we don't know yet which technology will be ready how quickly, why not just invest in both and see what happens?
85
And on the topic of current capacities, if we take nuclear energy offline right now, then that missing capacity will be replaced,
86
at least partially, by fossil fuels.
87
Even if new nuclear power plants in the West are expensive, in the long run it may be cheaper to build them
88
as long as they prevent more fossil fuel capacity being added and paying for the consequences of rapid climate change.
89
So, do we need nuclear energy?
90
Well, it really depends how hard we choose to make things for ourselves.
91
And in a world that's already having a really hard time quitting fossil fuels, why should we make things harder than necessary?

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 91개와 단어 1396개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 9:02입니다. 화자는 분당 약 155단어로, 일상 대화에 가까운 자연스러운 속도로 말합니다. 단어의 84%가 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속합니다. 나머지는 연습 전에 미리 확인해 두세요.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어발음뜻
fossil 명사/ˈfɑsl̩/화석
reactor 명사/ɹiˈæktɚ/원자로
transition 명사/tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/전이, 변화
rapid 형용사/ˈɹæp.ɪd/빠르다
innovation 명사/ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/혁신
solve 동사/sɒlv/해결하다
humanity 명사/hjuˈmænɪti/인류, 인간
grid 명사/ɡɹɪd/격자, 그리드
activist 명사/ˈæk.tɪ.vɪst/활동가
civilization 명사/ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/문명
greenhouse 명사/ˈɡɹːnˌ(h)aʊs/온실
offline 형용사/ɔfˈlaɪn/오프라인
topic 명사/ˈtɑpɪk/화제, 주제
vast 형용사/væst/광대하다, 거대하다
complicated 형용사/ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/복잡하다

영상에 나오는 구동사

단어뜻
give up 동사항복하다

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점were released · is still generated · have not been deployed
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때have been · has become · have not been deployed
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보those who are · going, which means

주의할 발음

화자는 we're, don't, doesn't 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 10번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.

  • “sh”와 “zh” 소리: emission /ɪˈmɪʃ.ən/, transition /tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/, innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, contrast /kənˈt(ʃ)ɹæst/
  • 긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: electricity /ɪˌlɛkˈtɹɪsɪti/, innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, humanity /hjuˈmænɪti/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, primarily /ˈpɹaɪ.mə.ɹə.li/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

  1. 먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
  2. 0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
  3. 자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, fossil, reactor, transition 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →