쉐도잉 연습: Harvard Thinking: Who should take GLP-1s? - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.

367 문장

문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.

My real nightmare about GLP -1s is

that we end up in a world where we cease to pay attention to the cause of the problem,

which is the various reasons that people are struggling with obesity in the first place.

It's like in the supermarket aisle, you can go down one aisle in the supermarket

and there are other companies selling all these foods that are really bad for us.

And then the same companies in the next aisle are selling us the weight loss products

that deal with the problem that they caused in the other aisle.

GLP -1s have evolved from a treatment of type 2 diabetes into drugs for weight management, leading to a surge in usage,

and evidence of promise against a range of other health issues.

But given how new these drugs are to the market,

medical professionals are only now starting to figure out who should and should not be using them, considering downstream risks like muscle loss,

which can particularly impact the elderly.

They also raise the question, do we lose anything when we allow taking a pill to become a substitute for lasting lifestyle changes?

Welcome to Harvard Thinking, a podcast where the life of the mind meets everyday life.

Today, I'm joined by...

Caroline Apovian.

I am an obesity medicine specialist, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.

She's also the co -inaugural director of the integrated

Mass General Brigham Center for Weight Management and Wellness.

Then...

Daniel Lieberman.

I'm a professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard University.

He's also a best -selling author and recently published

Fed Up, What Evolution Reveals About Food, Diet, Health, and Eating Well. And finally...

Dr. Fatima Cody -Stanford.

I'm an obesity medicine physician -scientist at Mass General Brigham.

She's also an associate professor of medicine and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School.

And I'm your host, Samantha Leine -Perfos.

I'm a writer for the Harvard Gazette.

Today, we'll talk about GLP -1s and why we should be excited about their potential and also cautious.

And a quick note, Caroline Apovian and Fatima Cody Stanford have worked with pharmaceutical companies, including makers of GLP -1s.

Caroline worked as a former consultant and Fatima as a current consultant.

Fatima has also received industry funding for her research.

What is so magical about this category of drug?

The word magical is a very interesting word to use.

We call these drugs game changers because of their robust effects on health and in particular on first,

you're right, type 2 diabetes and now obesity.

And obesity affects 42 % of the United States population.

Fatima Cody Stanford was instrumental in getting organizations to distinguish obesity to be a disease and not a matter of willpower.

And once that happened, the race was on to develop these drugs for use in obesity.

And the reason why they're considered magical is because for the first time in many people's lives,

they take a GLP -1 and suddenly, as they say, the food noise is gone.

They eat, they're full, they feel like eating healthy food, and they feel like exercising.

We never had anything like this before to treat obesity except for metabolic bariatric surgery.

So I actually push back a little bit on the terms game changer or magical.

I do think that they have definitely created an inflection point in how we think about this disease process.

Their potency has changed how the world sees

or approaches this disease process due to the fact

that we're looking at a total body weight change of either 15 % or 22%, or if we're looking at the triple agonists,

you know, getting to closer to 30 % total body weight loss.

And so when we look at these,

people in the world are beginning to realize that this disease process is beyond this idea of willpower and self -control,

that there is actual biology behind this disease.

It's not just, oh, eat less and exercise more.

And so I think this inflection point of really thinking about this from a disease process,

while we can go back to the AMA declaration in 2013 or the World Medical Association, which just happened in 2025,

it's when people start to become acclimated to the utilization of these medications and say, wait a minute, I do feel different.

Wait a minute, I am making different choices.

Wait a minute, these choices are influencing the way I interact with the world around me.

That they begin to think, wait a minute, it must be something in the biology of me,

and how my biology may differ from those around me.

And that was what really got the conversation moving in a different direction, outside of the typical status quo conversation.

If I can just add to that from an evolutionary perspective, I want to remind us all that we never evolved to lose weight.

We're an interesting species.

Human beings have a lot more body fat than most other mammals.

Most mammals rarely have more than about 5 % body fat, but in our evolutionary history,

we evolved to put on a lot more fat because it's really important for feeding our brains, for our reproductive system, for all kinds of reasons.

You know, in the past, it was extremely rare that anybody could gain extra weight, And we never evolved adaptations to lose it.

And instead, the key adaptations that we have are hunger and appetite, right?

So when we lose weight, we go into what we call negative energy balance.

We turn on a whole suite of signaling molecules, hormones, that signal to our brain that we're losing weight and make us hungry.

And that's why it's been so hard for so many people for so long to lose weight,

because they're fighting against millions of years of really deep and fundamental adaptations.

And all of a sudden, for the first time, we've got this drug that can turn off some of those adaptations.

From an evolutionary perspective, this is really quite astonishing.

The reason why I think these are game changers for the field of obesity medicine is because these are not drugs, right?

These are analogs of the hormones that the body makes when you eat food.

They have numerous effects on other organs, including the brain.

So I'd love to know from you, Dan, what you think about this evolutionary process

and using these naturally occurring hormones to then counteract what we've done to the environment.

Because it can't be purely genetic because our genes have evolved over millions of years and not over 50 or 100 years.

And so what is it about the environment?

Is it the ultra processed food?

Is it just the fact

that we've got all kinds of ways to throw down 3 ,000 calories by rolling down our window at fast food restaurants?

Look, everything about our bodies is an interaction between our genes and our environment.

Everything, right?

And this is no exception.

But as you say, our genes haven't changed that much in the last few generations.

But in my lifetime, the percentage of Americans with obesity has quadrupled.

So obviously it's not because some genes for weight gain have suddenly swept through the population in the last generation or two.

But it is true that some people have more proclivity than others.

But the other thing is that, of course, there are many factors that affect weight gain.

Your microbiome is one of them.

Your metabolism.

People differ in their metabolic rates.

Physical activity has some effect, particularly for weight gain prevention, not so much for weight loss.

We could go on for all the various factors, but nobody doubts that the one thing that's changed the most, of course, is our food.

When we walk into a supermarket here in Boston, the average supermarket here has 40 ,000 different kinds of food.

100

40 ,000 different kinds of food.

101

And something between 50 and 70, depending upon your definition, are ultra -processed.

102

These are foods where the fiber has been removed, sugar and fat has been added, they've been made hyperpalatable.

103

They've got all kinds of tricks and gimmicks to make us eat more.

104

So there is an association, unquestionably, between the proliferation of processed foods and weight gain.

105

And here's the thing, most of us, once we gain the weight, because of those adaptations, our bodies then reach a new set point.

106

We now call it a settling point because for reasons that I don't think any of us understand,

107

your body fights to put you back at the previous weight, not necessarily your original weight.

108

But then one of the things that I want to bring up, particularly as we think about this from an evolutionary perspective,

109

is I want to think about the group that happens to carry the highest weight, particularly within the U .S population,

110

which happens to be Black women.

111

I want to take us back to our period of enslavement.

112

And if we really look at when Black women started to accumulate great levels of adiposity,

113

it was actually during our periods of enslavement, which is very interesting.

114

Because during the period of enslavement, we didn't have ultra -processed foods.

115

There was high levels of physical activity.

116

But what we don't account for during that timeframe, which really sets us up for the high levels of obesity within this population,

117

the group that I represent, is the allostatic load and stress that started to occur for that population at that time.

118

I think we have to recognize that early predisposition to obesity within the population

119

that carries the highest burden here in the United States now, and when it started for us,

120

and then bring it over to the high burden that then exists, and particularly think about it now in the context of what we see.

121

Yeah.

122

I completely agree.

123

To add to that list, I should have mentioned stress, chronic stress, for example, which is of course a function of socioeconomic status and racism.

124

There are epigenetic effects.

125

So yeah, I 100 % agree with you.

126

This is a multifactorial problem.

127

There's no question that our food supply is a major one, but it's not the only one.

128

One thing about food that I did want to ask about was this idea of food noise.

129

What does that mean?

130

And what is it about GLP -1s that are affecting it?

131

For people that have food noise, they are constantly thinking about food.

132

It doesn't matter if it's ultra processed, it doesn't matter if it's not.

133

They have this constant desire to want to eat.

134

And for those that are responders to GOP -1s, when they go on something like a GOP -1,

135

they say they no longer think about eating in the way that they did before.

136

So that volume that might be really high, you turn that down and they're like, wait a minute, I'm not thinking about food.

137

I actually forgot to eat breakfast, lunch, and wait a minute, it's dinner time.

138

I turned down the volume.

139

So this thinking about food, it's no longer a focal point.

140

For some people, not everyone, GLP -1s also reduce other kinds of noise, other forms of addiction for people who have issues with,

141

say, tobacco or certain pharmaceuticals or alcohol.

142

And so there's something just really quite extraordinary about this hormone and its multiple effects.

143

And because you have to remember that hormones evolved to do multiple things,

144

but I like to think of hormones really as allocators of investment and energy.

145

And this is a hormone that's basically telling the body to turn down stuff.

146

We have hormones that turn things up and hormones that turn things down.

147

It's a very crude simplification.

148

But what's amazing is that GOP1s normally in human beings, they have very short action.

149

And the real turning point for this was

150

that they used essentially the GLP -1 of a lizard that eats only once every three weeks or something.

151

I can't remember the Gila monster.

152

And that has a much longer acting effect than the human version.

153

And now we're finding out all kinds of fascinating things about this hormone.

154

So one thing I want to talk about too is that the usage for these drugs has increased significantly.

155

Secondly, I think as of last year, one in eight American adults was using GLP -1s for weight loss.

156

Dan, you have been vocal about some of your skepticisms with GLP -1s.

157

I would love to hear some of the concerns and or limitations that we are seeing.

158

I'm not skeptical.

159

So I have two concerns really that are overriding.

160

The first is that the evidence is that a lot of people on GLP -1s are losing a lot of muscle mass.

161

As with bariatric surgery, where you have very extreme weight loss, people can lose something like 20, 30, even more percent of their body weight.

162

And a large percentage of that, maybe up to 30 percent of that can be fat -free mass.

163

So we're not talking about body fat.

164

We're talking about other tissues.

165

And some of that's muscle.

166

And one of the big issues for aging in the United States is sarcopenia, which is age -related muscle loss.

167

And so it's not a skepticism, but it's a concern that individuals who are on GLP -1s losing a lot of weight,

168

if they don't include some degree of strength training, they could be at greater risk for age -related muscle loss for sarcopenia.

169

And that's really concerning because that becomes a kind of vicious cycle.

170

Once you get very frail, you become less physically active, you become even less active.

171

I can speak from personal experience with my parents.

172

It's a really challenging thing to watch.

173

My other concern, of course, is that a lot of people, and Caroline and Fatima will know the data better than I,

174

but there's a fairly high quit rate for these drugs.

175

I think the latest study I saw, and I'm sure there's better data now,

176

was that over 50 % of people are quitting it between one and two years.

177

And then the other concern is what happens when they quit, right?

178

Are they gaining weight back?

179

But you guys know more about this than I do.

180

Yeah, these are two big areas, Dan.

181

The muscle loss concept is very much debated.

182

First of all, when you lose any kind of weight by any means, you're right, bariatric surgery, drugs,

183

diet, and exercise, you don't lose just fat, right?

184

Because if you have obesity, there's extra muscle to hold everything together.

185

And the Krebs cycle metabolism, you need amino acids to burn energy.

186

So you can't just lose fat.

187

There is always a certain percent that is muscle.

188

And you really can't go below losing 20, 25 percent of the total as muscle.

189

So that's physiology.

190

Yes, there are people who lose more, 30 or 40 percent.

191

We think it may have to do with the rapidity of the weight loss if they're not eating enough protein.

192

And yes, if they're not doing strength training.

193

But I think that the largest concern about muscle mass should be with the older population.

194

The older population is already losing muscle mass, something like 1 % per year after the age of 40 or 50.

195

And yes, those people on GLP -1s

196

or after bariatric surgery may lose more muscle mass and develop dysfunction and frailty and sarcopenia and also bone loss.

197

So that's a valid concern.

198

And we've already had people in the older population losing 40 pounds on Wagovi

199

and then falling and fracturing their tibfib because it was fragile.

200

I definitely think that the muscle loss piece is by far more germane to those that are older adults, and particularly with the new

201

Medicare Bridge program that's just come into place, right?

202

So for those who are unaware, Medicare has decided to start covering these medications for individuals with obesity as of July 1st,

203

which means that there's going to be a sizable percentage of the population that now have access to these drugs.

204

The program appears to be in place from July 1st of 2026 through December 31st of 2027,

205

We have no idea what's going to happen after that.

206

But a sizable percentage of the population, particularly those that are 65 plus, will gain access.

207

Now, we also know that population has a higher tendency to have issues like sarcopenia.

208

And we do need to think about protein and muscle retention during that population.

209

And so this is what I really like to emphasize with my patients.

210

And this is how I bring them into the conversation, regardless of age.

211

I say in our 20s and 30s, I like to think of a one -to -one ratio of cardio to strength.

212

So 30 minutes of strength for 30 minutes of cardio.

213

When we get into our 40s and 50s where I exist in that middle age range,

214

I think of it as a two to one strength to cardio ratio.

215

So for every 60 minutes of strength, 30 minutes of cardio.

216

In our 60s and 70s, I like to think of a three to one strength to cardio ratio.

217

So for every 90 minutes of strength, we should have 30 minutes of cardio.

218

And if we get into our 80s and 90s, I like to think of it as a four to one strength to cardio ratio.

219

So for every 120 minutes of strength training, 30 minutes of cardio.

220

Now, tell me how many people actually do that.

221

Zero own.

222

Exactly.

223

Unless you're me, right?

224

And so this is what I emphasize with my patients.

225

And when they're getting that mantra, they begin to realize the importance of strength training,

226

because we've been fed this idea that it's cardio, cardio, cardio, cardio, cardio.

227

But if you're really strength training in the way that we're talking about it, you are getting that heart health benefit from doing the strength training.

228

Now, moving into your second piece, which is how people pull back the utilization.

229

So 50 % discontinuation of GOP -1s.

230

The number one reason for the discontinuation is cost, access.

231

But what we've seen, and I will use Massachusetts as a case in point for discontinuation for these medications.

232

Up until January 1st of 2026, Massachusetts had the best utilization and coverage for GOP -1 receptor agonists.

233

If we look at employer -sponsored insurance, here in Massachusetts, the big four are Mass General Brigham,

234

Harvard Pilgrim, Tufts, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts or New England.

235

All of these insurers were covering GOP -1s for patients with overweight and obesity.

236

But as of January 1st, pulled back coverage for this patient population.

237

What happened was our patient populations got pulled off of these medications.

238

Now, for persons that are high -income earners, they were able to retain utilization of these medications.

239

Price point between $300 and $450 a month out -of -pocket price.

240

But if you're a high -income earner, that's not too much for you.

241

If you're not a high -income earner, it's a lot.

242

That's a very important point.

243

I just saw a patient virtually because he weighs 625 pounds.

244

But he did weigh 725 pounds,

245

and he lost 100 pounds getting ready for bariatric surgery with ZepBound.

246

He lost 100 pounds on the top dose of ZepBound.

247

And then in July, it got pulled.

248

He is now gaining weight.

249

And I just messaged the surgeon and said, you better get him to surgery now because he's going to gain that weight back.

250

You got to get him to surgery now.

251

This is the segment of the population, BMI over 60, still rising exponentially in the United States and probably worldwide.

252

So what are we going to do about this weight regain?

253

It's causing a lot of oxidative stress,

254

especially as you gain it rapidly so that food noise comes back very aggressively,

255

especially if you've lost 100 pounds and you suddenly stop the GLP -1, you suddenly think that you're starving to death.

256

My other concern about GLP -1s is about prevention and really goes back to what we started off talking about,

257

which is that, so I have this term I apologize for, which I created, called disevolution.

258

When we treat the symptoms rather than the causes of a mismatched problem.

259

Then we just keep the cycle going.

260

My real nightmare about GOP -1s is

261

that we end up in a world where we cease to pay attention to the cause of the problem,

262

which is the various reasons that people are struggling with obesity in the first place.

263

It's like in the supermarket aisle, you can go down one aisle in the supermarket

264

and there are other companies selling all these foods that are really bad for us.

265

And then the same companies in the next aisle are selling us the weight loss products

266

that deal with the problem that they caused in the other aisle.

267

Ultimately, what we should all really want to do is prevent this problem from happening in the first place.

268

That got to another question that I wanted to ask all of you.

269

It is amazing that these medications are able to so effectively help people.

270

And also, what happens when it becomes a substitute for the lifestyle change that needs to happen?

271

I don't think it's a substitute for the lifestyle changes.

272

So by the time the patients get to us, these patients have tried and failed, or that lifestyle has tried and failed them.

273

They can list 25 to 30 different programs that they've tried and failed.

274

It's like the biggest loser concept.

275

It worked for a short period of time, and then it didn't work, and their bodies came back.

276

And so then they're coming to us because they're like, okay, look, I've tried all these things.

277

And so let's say they go on these medications, and they're like, oh, wait a minute, this works.

278

Now they can actually go work out they are feeling good about themselves going to the gym

279

and seeing the results pay off while they're on the medications.

280

Because as Dan mentioned, if it pulls back, they're regaining.

281

And then they're feeling lack of confidence.

282

Their self -worth and self -esteem unfortunately deteriorates because they're like, here I am.

283

I finally got to the quote unquote promised land and it was snatched from me.

284

I always say nobody wants to have obesity.

285

If diet and exercise worked and they wouldn't be stigmatized walking down the street because they have obesity.

286

They would have done it.

287

We have a disease.

288

GLP -1s are not removing the cause of the problem,

289

but what it is doing is it is reducing the body weight set point.

290

I fully agree with you two, but I do want to ask you about children.

291

So as I'm sure you both know, there are very scary statistics about the percentage of teenagers in the United States who are classified with obesity.

292

It's somewhere between 20 and 30%, depending upon which study you believe in.

293

Should we be giving GLP -1s to those kids?

294

Me, my concern is how do we prevent those kids from getting into that problem in the first place?

295

Okay, so I treat the full age spectrum.

296

My patients go from two to 90 plus.

297

And I think about who are the pediatric patients who actually end up in my clinic.

298

It's usually the children of my patients.

299

So how do I prevent this?

300

If I can get the patients modified preconception, I have a higher likelihood of having children that have a lesser likelihood of obesity.

301

The best study was a study that came out in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism back in 2009,

302

which demonstrated that children born to mothers

303

that undergone bariatric surgery had a three -fold decrease in likelihood of obesity in the mother after she had undergone surgical intervention.

304

So if we can modify the weight status of the parent's preconception, we can modify the children's weight status.

305

Let's come back to the question you specifically asked.

306

Do we utilize these medications in children and how does that work?

307

I do treat patients as young as 12 with GLP -1 receptor agonists.

308

What I have found in treating these patients, first of all, when I get pediatric patients,

309

I find that they actually have health status that's much worse than my adult patients.

310

Their cholesterol is much worse.

311

Their liver function tests are much worse.

312

Their hemoglobin A1c, which is their blood sugar, is much worse.

313

What I also find when using these medications is

314

that they usually respond much better than my adult patients to the therapy when given to them.

315

That gives them a likelihood of having a much better life

316

moving forward than I did prior to the advent of these medications.

317

So I see these patients go from looking down in my visit, not actually making direct eye contact because their self -esteem,

318

their value, their self -worth is so tied into their weight, to making eye contact, having an improvement of their cardiometabolic health,

319

and allowing them to move forward into adulthood with a better life.

320

When we talk about GLP -1s, obviously they're so new.

321

We're still figuring out so many things.

322

What do you feel we are not talking about enough?

323

or what are things that we really should be focusing on as an area of further research?

324

I think that GLP -1's just created this explosion in social media, and in research, and in the medical community.

325

And I think what we're not talking about adequately enough is who are they for?

326

The protocols are not in yet.

327

We're writing guidelines with the ADA, but we're not categorizing patients.

328

I think the highest risk patients should be getting our more potent drugs and be considered for metabolic surgery.

329

The BMI is not an adequate measure of body fat.

330

We still don't have the right tools to measure who is at risk.

331

And social media now is on a rampage which compounded GLP -1s that people are taking to lose 10 pounds.

332

If you take a GLP -1 to lose 10 pounds, you don't have the disease of obesity.

333

Are you setting yourself up?

334

for stopping the medication, gaining even more weight back, and developing a problem that you didn't have in the first place.

335

So if you're going to take a GLP -1 just to lose 10 pounds so you can look good in your dress,

336

you should not be taking a GLP -1.

337

It's not for you.

338

I think one of the key things that we're not talking about are the potential use case scenarios for GLP -1s.

339

What we do know is we have GLP -1s were initially approved for type 2 diabetes, and then we moved into obesity and obstructive sleep apnea.

340

But we're going to continue to see different use case scenarios for these medications.

341

And there's a variety of research interests

342

that move outside of the space of cardiometabolic health into looking at rheumatologic conditions like gout and rheumatoid arthritis.

343

We're looking at disorders like Alzheimer's disease and Parkinsonism and things of that sort.

344

And so as we begin to see this blossoming of research,

345

I think it's going to be interesting to see just really how these medications begin to explode beyond the cardiometabolic use,

346

and then how the dosing structure will change to accommodate these potential use case scenarios as we move forward.

347

My thing that I really hope we can use GLP Wands to talk more about is

348

that there really are game changers for treatment.

349

There's no question about that.

350

But they're not game changers for prevention.

351

Wouldn't the best world be where you didn't have to use these in the first place?

352

The fact of the matter is we do, and we should, and they are helping a lot of people,

353

and we'll find out better ways to use them and maybe other adjuvants that can help us use them better.

354

But hopefully we can leverage the opportunities that GLP -1s are giving us for treatment to also think more about prevention.

355

Thank you all for joining me for this conversation.

356

My pleasure.

357

Thank you.

358

It's been a pleasure speaking to everyone.

359

Thanks for listening.

360

For a transcript of this episode and our other episodes, visit harvard .edu slash thinking.

361

If you liked this episode, rate and review us on Apple or Spotify, or like us on YouTube.

362

It helps others find us.

363

This episode was hosted and produced by me, Samantha Lainey -Perfos.

364

It was edited by Ryan Mulcahy, Paul Mekishima, and Sarah Lamade.

365

Original music and sound design by Noel Flatt.

366

Produced by Harvard University.

367

앱 다운로드

유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것

AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인

IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터

단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기

단어 게임놀면서 외우기

QR 스캔

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

같은 채널

FOR YOU

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 말하기 레슨은 영상 “Harvard Thinking: Who should take GLP-1s?”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 가장 자주 반복되는 단어는 다음과 같습니다: Glp, weight, obesity, patient. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 252개와 단어 4750개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 27:36입니다. 화자는 분당 약 172단어로, 일상 대화에 가까운 자연스러운 속도로 말합니다. 단어의 83%가 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속합니다. 나머지는 연습 전에 미리 확인해 두세요.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어	발음	뜻
obesity 명사	/ə(ʊ)ˈbiːsɪti/	비만
muscle 명사	/ˈmʌs.əl/	근육
hormone 명사	/ˈhoɹmoʊn/	호르몬
aisle 명사	/aɪ̯l/	통로
supermarket 명사	/ˌsupɚˈmɑɹkət/	슈퍼마켓, 슈퍼
percentage 명사	/pə(ɹ)ˈsɛntɪd͡ʒ/	백분율, 백분비
adaptation 명사	/ˌæd.æpˈteɪ.ʃən/	적응
ratio 명사	/ˈɹeɪ.ʃoʊ/	비, 비율
gene 명사	/d͡ʒiːn/	유전자
prevention 명사	/pɹɪˈvɛnʃən/	예방
biology 명사	/baɪˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	생물학
magical 형용사	/ˈmæd͡ʒ.ɪ.kəl/	마법의
likelihood 명사	/ˈlaɪklihʊd/	가능성
scenario 명사	/sɪˈnɛəɹioʊ/	각본, 대본
diabetes 명사	/ˌdaɪəˈbiːtiːz/	당뇨병

영상에 나오는 구동사

단어	뜻
come back 동사	돌아오다
go down 동사	내려가다
bring up 동사	꺼내다
turn off 동사	끄다, 턴오프하다

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형	영상 속 표현
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때	have evolved · have worked · has also received
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점	has been removed · we've been fed · is cost
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보	enslavement, which is · example, which is · people who have

주의할 발음

화자는 they're, we're, I'm 같은 축약형과 약화된 형태를 82번 사용합니다. 들리는 대로 짧게 발음하세요.

“sh”와 “zh” 소리: medication /mɛdɪˈkeɪʃən/, evolutionary /ˌiː.vəˈluː.ʃən.ɛɹ.i/, adaptation /ˌæd.æpˈteɪ.ʃən/, ratio /ˈɹeɪ.ʃoʊ/, prevention /pɹɪˈvɛnʃən/
긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: obesity /ə(ʊ)ˈbiːsɪti/, medication /mɛdɪˈkeɪʃən/, evolutionary /ˌiː.vəˈluː.ʃən.ɛɹ.i/, supermarket /ˌsupɚˈmɑɹkət/, adaptation /ˌæd.æpˈteɪ.ʃən/

한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:

/f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: lifestyle /ˈlaɪfˌstaɪl/, modify /ˈmɑ.dɪˌfaɪ/, physically /ˈfɪz.ɪ.kli/, differ /ˈdɪfɚ/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/
/v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: evolutionary /ˌiː.vəˈluː.ʃən.ɛɹ.i/, evolve /ɪˈvɑlv/, prevention /pɹɪˈvɛnʃən/, everyday /ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/, valid /ˈvælɪd/
/z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: diabetes /ˌdaɪəˈbiːtiːz/, metabolism /məˈtæb.əˌlɪz.əm/, physically /ˈfɪz.ɪ.kli/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/, racism /ˈɹeɪsɪzm̩/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
0.75배속으로 한 문장씩 섀도잉을 시작하고, 익숙해지면 보통 속도로 돌아갑니다.
자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, obesity, muscle, hormone 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →

쉐도잉 연습: Harvard Thinking: Who should take GLP-1s? - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

앱 다운로드

같은 채널

Jonny Kim | Harvard Alumni Day 2026

Education gap: The root of inequality

Bill Gates Harvard Commencement Address 2007

President Alan Garber | Harvard Alumni Day 2026

Noah Eckstein Delivers the Senior English Address | Harvard Commencement 2026

Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE MORAL SIDE OF MURDER"

Natalie Portman Harvard Commencement Speech | Harvard Commencement 2015

Harvard Orator Eunice Alison Nyang’or Mwabe | Harvard Commencement 2019

추천 영상

Freedom from fatness: Why GLP-1s go after Black bodies | Code Switch

Biotech Story Time With Tal Zaks, M.D. (Part 1)

Statin Misinformation: Mayo Clinic Radio

Blindboy discovers the link between gut health and mental health

Dr. Andy Galpin: Does Cardio Ruin Muscle Growth?.

What Happens When You Eat Too Much Sugar? According To A Sugar Expert

Why successful people set habits, not just goals | Wendy Wood

AI & Inequality | Daron Acemoglu: Big Tech poses risks as AI reshapes society

What is Public Health? Episode 1 of "That's Public Health"

Johann Hari on addiction

Talk Back: Why Arguing With Yourself Can Help You Flourish

Obesity, Causes, SIgns and Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment.