Shadowing Practice: Cornel West: How Intellectuals Betrayed the Poor | Big Think - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

85 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Yeah, I think one was, there was a idolizing of unfettered markets.
2
And much, if not most, of the intelligentsia were duped.
3
I recall traveling with my dear brother Michael Harrington talking with Brother Stanley Aronowitz years ago,
4
and, you know, here we're engaging critiques of unfettered markets, and it looked as if we were medieval thinkers.
5
Everybody was saying we're followers of Milton Friedman.
6
Everybody was saying Frederick Hayek got it right.
7
Everybody was saying marketize, commercialize, commodify.
8
And we were still reading Lukács, and Lukács was saying commodification is not simply an asymmetric relation of power,
9
of bosses vis -a -vis workers.
10
So workers are being more and more marginalized.
11
Profits are being produced, wealth is being produced, hemorrhaged at the top.
12
No fair distribution of that wealth or profit for workers.
13
Poor are being demonized because they are viewed as those persons who are irresponsible, who will not work, who are always looking for welfare,
14
i .e., failures in the society of success.
15
And we reached the brink and the chickens came home to roost.
16
And a few years ago the unfettered markets led us off and over the brink.
17
And all of a sudden very few intellectuals want to be honest and acknowledge the degree to which they were duped.
18
Don't want to talk about the inequality that went along with it.
19
Don't want to talk about the demonization of the poor that went along with it.
20
Don't want to talk about the politics of fear
21
that produced a republican party that was more
22
and more lily white using not just race but also demonizing gay brothers
23
and lesbian sisters you see don't want to talk about the indifference toward the poor
24
and greed being good and desirable and so forth now it's a very different moment
25
and it's not you know just about a pointing fingers but saying somebody's got to take responsibility for this.
26
This was a nearly 40 -year run.
27
Who paid the cost?
28
That's usually the case.
29
Poor working people paid the cost, disproportionately black and brown and red.
30
So in the age of Obama, we say, okay, can we have a different kind of discussion?
31
And that's what we're trying to do.
32
But of course, you've got two wars going on.
33
You've got still Wall Street in the driver's seat in the Obama administration when it comes to the economic team, you see?
34
And you've got very, you know, I think in some ways unimaginative thinking when it comes to foreign policy,
35
be it the Middle East or be it European Union or be it Latin America, you know, calling Chavez a dictator, the man's been elected.
36
If he's calling in the question of rights and liberties, criticize him as a Democratic president.
37
We did the same thing for Bush.
38
Bush was calling him the question rights and liberty.
39
We didn't call him a dictator.
40
We said he's a democratic elected president who's doing the wrong thing.
41
Chavez ought to be criticized.
42
He's not a dictator.
43
The man's been elected.
44
But it's that kind of demonizing that obscures and obfuscates the kinds of issues that are necessary because
45
Chavez is also talking about poor people.
46
Of course, I want libertarian and democratic sides.
47
I want rights and liberties and empowerment of poor people.
48
But talking about poor people is not a joke it's crucial it's part
49
and parcel of the future of any serious democratic project the
50
fundamental question of any democracy is what is the relation between public
51
and interests and the most vulnerable that's the question
52
that is the question the test of your rule of law
53
is going to be how are the most vulnerable being treated
54
it's not whether the torturers are getting off we know the
55
tortures don't have a rule of law applied to them the The wiretappers, they're getting off scot -free.
56
What about Jamal with the crack bag?
57
Taken to jail for seven years.
58
Oh, so you got a different rule of law when it comes to Jamal on the corner versus your
59
torturers and your wiretappers?
60
Torture is a crime against humanity, it's not just illegal, wiretapping is illegal.
61
Now it's not a crime against humanity, because I mean, I'm sure I've had my phone tapped for years.
62
I don't think they commit the crime against humanity, they just ought to quit doing it, I think to keep you in mind,
63
the demos is always heterogeneous, diverse, got a lot of xenophobic elements among the demos,
64
a lot of ignorance, a lot of parochialism, you also have a lot of cosmopolitanism, a lot of globalism, a lot of courage, moral courage.
65
So the demos is not one thing.
66
But when it comes to the ability of the demos to organize, mobilize, and bring power and pressure to bear.
67
we certainly are in a crisis our system is broken we've got 71 of people who want universal health care
68
and you can barely get through a reform bill with a
69
weak public option it's clear lobbyists from the top pharmaceutical companies
70
drug companies have tremendous influence much more than the demos from below you see
71
so that that those those preferences don't get translated easily
72
because our politicians are beholden to that big money and that big influence
73
but i mean the demos are still around thank god you got your own institution
74
dialogue dialogue is the lifeblood of a democracy we gotta allow
75
ideas to flow you have to expose people to different visions alternative arguments
76
and so on to try to keep the torch of the progressive demos alive
77
but it's very difficult to to organize it complacency is deep
78
apathy is deep uh people are wondering how can you confront you know big finance big
79
government tied to big finance when all you got is these little people
80
who are willing to talk and so forth
81
but have tremendous power bringing uh serious pressure to bear we
82
can march you know we marched against the war by the
83
millions we were ignored by the bush administration some of us
84
went to jail we were ignored we couldn't translate the foreign policy That happened sometimes.
85
It was different in Vietnam.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze video bevat 85 zinnen en 1039 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 6:23. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 163 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. Slechts 81% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
demo zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈdɛm.oʊ/demo, demonstratie
worker zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈwɝ.kɚ/arbeider, arbeidster
liberty zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈlɪbəti/vrijheid
humanity zelfstandig naamwoord/hjuˈmænɪti/mensheid, mensdom
elect werkwoord/ɪˈlɛkt/kiezen, uitkiezen
dictator zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈdɪkˌteɪtəɹ/dictator
ignore werkwoord/ɪɡˈnɔː/negeren
courage zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈkʌ.ɹɪd͡ʒ/moed, dapperheid
relation zelfstandig naamwoord/ɹɪˈleɪʃ(ə)n/familielid, bloedverwant
dialogue zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈdaɪəˌlɑɡ/dialoog, gesprek
vulnerable bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈvʌln(ə)ɹəbl̩/kwetsbaar
torture zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈtoɹt͡ʃɚ/marteling, foltering
tremendous bijvoeglijk naamwoord/tɹɪˈmɛndəs/ontzagwekkend
organize werkwoord/ˈɔɹɡənaɪz/organiseren
translate werkwoord/tɹænzˈleɪt/vertalen, overzetten

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
get off werkwoordvan ... afgaan

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doetwere duped · being produced · being demonized
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog teltman's been elected · I've had

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 20 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, we're, you've. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: apathy /ˈæ.pə.θi/, thinker /ˈθɪŋ.kɚ/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: relation /ɹɪˈleɪʃ(ə)n/, institution /ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/, crucial /ˈkɹuː.ʃəl/, politician /ˌpɑ.ləˈtɪʃ.ən/, commercialize /kəˈmɚʃəˌlaɪz/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: humanity /hjuˈmænɪti/, universal /ˌjunəˈvɜɹs(ə)l/, institution /ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als demo, worker, liberty.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →