跟讀練習: Core Knowledge (Stanford Psych 60) - 通過影片學習英語口語
選擇練習模式
每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。
64 句
如果句子過短或過長,請點選 Edit 進行調整。
1
Hi, my name is Kara Wiseman.
2
I'm a PhD student in developmental psychology at Stanford.
3
I study social cognitive development, focusing on how young children and adults think about concepts like consciousness, sentience, and personhood.
4
Today, I'm going to be talking to you about a very influential idea in developmental psychology, that babies are born with what researchers call core knowledge.
5
Some researchers think that infants mostly rely on all -purpose mechanisms for learning about the world.
6
These mechanisms are domain general, meaning that they can be applied to everything from learning about the physical world,
7
to understanding numbers, to figuring out social relationships.
8
Other researchers think that infants are born with more domain -specific ways of making sense of their experiences.
9
They think that infants are born with a handful of distinct cognitive systems for reasoning about different parts of the world.
10
This perspective is called the theory of core knowledge.
11
On this theory, the human mind contains a few, maybe five or six, core knowledge systems,
12
and each one is responsible for dealing with just a small chunk of the world.
13
Here's one well -studied example of a core knowledge system, the core object system.
14
The core object system supports reasoning about objects, like rocks or strawberries or basketballs, and the laws of physics that govern them.
15
This system, like other core knowledge systems, is characterized by a handful of key principles, specific pieces of knowledge that guide reasoning in this domain.
16
In the core object system, one of these key principles is the principle of cohesion.
17
Objects should hold together across time and space, rather than disintegrating.
18
Objects should also obey the principle of continuity, that is, they should move along continuous paths through time and space,
19
rather than appearing and disappearing at random.
20
Finally, there's the principle of contact.
21
Objects should only start to move when something else touches them, and not without being touched.
22
The reason these three key principles, cohesion, continuity, and contact,
23
are said to characterize the core object system is
24
because studies have shown that infants expect objects to behave according to these principles and are surprised when objects violate them.
25
Another important part of the core object system and other core knowledge systems is that it is characterized by signature limits,
26
situations in which the system falls apart.
27
Studies with both young infants and adults have demonstrated
28
that the core object system can keep track of about three to four of these objects at a time, but not more.
29
And it doesn't do well with things like piles of sand, liquids, or other substances, which violate the key principle of cohesion.
30
This can lead to some pretty funny experimental findings, like young infants seeming not to notice when a single pile of sand goes behind a curtain,
31
and then have somehow turned into two separate piles of sand when the curtain is raised.
32
So far, research indicates that there are about five or six of these core knowledge systems,
33
each of which has its own set of key principles and signature limits.
34
The core object system is one of the best studied, but there is also extensive research on a core number system,
35
supporting reasoning about quantity and keeping track of how many things there are in some context.
36
A core agent system, supporting reasoning about creatures that act autonomously to pursue their goals,
37
a core place system, supporting navigation around an environment, and a core system for shape or form, supporting representation of the shapes of objects.
38
Recently, some researchers have also speculated about a core knowledge system for social partners, supporting reasoning about social interactions and relationships.
39
This is still an active area of research.
40
Core knowledge theorists argue that these core systems are innate, present at birth rather than learned over time,
41
and that the systems are shared across many species, rather than being unique to humans.
42
Researchers have converged on these conclusions from a few different angles.
43
Many researchers conduct studies with humans of different ages, including research with newborn infants, with older infants as they gain more experience and skills,
44
with toddlers as they become fluent speakers of their language.
45
with school children, as they are explicitly instructed in arithmetic, geometry, manners, and other subjects, and with adults.
46
Another research approach has been to compare performance across species, including not only humans, but also non -human primates,
47
newly hatched chicks, zebrafish, and even ants.
48
Finally, researchers sometimes compare performance across different cultural contexts that vary in the languages people use, the everyday environments that people experience,
49
and the values and beliefs that people hold.
50
For example, lots of research has compared people living in highly industrialized urban centers like
51
San Francisco or Beijing to people living in isolated indigenous communities in rural Papua New Guinea or the Amazonian rainforest.
52
Across many of these studies, participants of different ages, species,
53
and cultural contexts have all shown similar sensitivities to the key principles and signature limits of each of the core knowledge systems,
54
leading some researchers to argue that these systems are likely to be innate and species general.
55
Other researchers disagree.
56
It's important to note that the theory of core knowledge does not claim to explain all of human cognition.
57
Core knowledge theorists would not claim
58
that there are an infinite number of core knowledge systems for all the different chunks of the world
59
we might reason about or interact with, or that there are core knowledge systems for things like computers or astrophysics,
60
which have no plausible role in evolutionary history.
61
Instead, researchers in this tradition view the small handful of core knowledge systems as fundamental building blocks that, over the course of learning and development,
62
combine to help us reason about more and more complex concepts like computers, astrophysics, and minds.
63
For more on the topic of core knowledge, check out these papers.
64
Thank you.
FOR YOU
推薦影片
本課的詞彙與口語要點
這節口語課以影片“Core Knowledge”為素材。 影片中反覆出現的詞有:core, knowledge, object, principle, researchers。 這段影片共有 35 個句子、982 個單詞可供跟讀。 講話部分時長為 7:02。 說話人語速平穩,每分鐘約 140 個詞,很適合跟讀。 只有 79% 的單詞屬於英語最常用的 3,000 詞,詞彙難度較高。
影片中的重點詞彙
影片中 15 個值得學習的單詞,附發音和釋義:
| 單詞 | 發音 | 釋義 |
|---|---|---|
| principle 名詞 | /ˈpɹɪn.sɪ.pəl/ | 原理, 原則 /原則 |
| researcher 名詞 | /ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/ | 研究員 /研究員, 研究者 |
| compare 動詞 | /kəmˈpɛɚ/ | 比, 比較 /比較 |
| sand 名詞 | /sænd/ | 沙, 沙子 |
| domain 名詞 | /ˌdəʊˈmeɪ̯n/ | 領域 /領域 |
| signature 名詞 | /ˈsɪɡ.nə.t͡ʃə/ | 簽字 /簽字, 簽名 /簽名 |
| pile 名詞 | /paɪl/ | 堆 |
| handful 名詞 | /ˈhæn(d)fʊl/ | 少數 /少數 |
| argue 動詞 | /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/ | 辯論 /辯論, 爭辯 /爭辯 |
| psychology 名詞 | /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/ | 心理學 /心理學 |
| mechanism 名詞 | /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/ | 機械 /機械, 機構 /機構 |
| cognitive 形容詞 | /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/ | 認知的 /認知的 |
| curtain 名詞 | /ˈkɜɹt(ə)n/ | 窗簾 /窗簾, 簾子 /簾子 |
| violate 動詞 | /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/ | 違反 /違反, 違犯 /違犯 |
| chunk 名詞 | /t͡ʃʌŋk/ | 塊 /塊 |
影片中出現的短語動詞
| 單詞 | 釋義 |
|---|---|
| check out 動詞 | 退房 |
| figure out 動詞 | 弄清楚 |
影片中的語法
說話人最常用的結構,並附上影片中的原話:
| 結構 | 影片中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼,而不是誰做的 | are born · can be applied · is called |
| 現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事 | have shown · have demonstrated · have also speculated |
需要注意的發音
說話人用了 3 次縮略和弱讀形式,例如 I'm, doesn't。請按聽到的簡短形式來說。
- “th” 音: theorist /ˈθiːəɹəst/, arithmetic /æɹɪθˈmɛtɪk/
- “sh” 和 “zh” 音: conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, consciousness /ˈkɑnʃəsnəs/, influential /ɪnflʊˈɛnʃəl/
- 長單詞——注意重音位置: psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, mechanism /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/, developmental /dɪˌvɛləpˈmɛntəl/, continuity /ˌkɑn.tɪˈn(j)u.ə.ti/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/
中文母語者容易讀錯的音:
- /v/ — 不要讀成 /w/,上齒輕觸下唇: cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, developmental /dɪˌvɛləpˈmɛntəl/, violate /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/, everyday /ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/, vary /ˈvɛəɹi/
- 詞尾子音 — 要讀清楚,後面不要加母音: sand /sænd/, cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, violate /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/, chunk /t͡ʃʌŋk/, topic /ˈtɑpɪk/
- /r/ 和 /l/ 的區別: principle /ˈpɹɪn.sɪ.pəl/, rely /ɹɪˈlaɪ/, experimental /ɪkspɛɹəˈmɛntəl/, evolutionary /ˌiː.vəˈluː.ʃən.ɛɹ.i/, industrialize /ɪnˈdʌstɹiəlaɪz/
如何用這段影片練習
- 先完整聽一遍影片,不要開口,記下不認識的單詞。
- 用正常速度逐句跟讀,每句重複到你的節奏與說話人一致為止。
- 錄下自己的聲音並與原聲對比,特別注意 principle, researcher, compare 這類單詞。
什麼是跟讀法?
跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧,最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓,並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大:您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同,跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性,語調,節奏,連讀,聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。












