跟读练习: Core Knowledge (Stanford Psych 60) - 通过视频学习英语口语
选择练习模式
每种模式都会打开全屏练习室。
64 句
如果句子过短或过长,请点击 Edit 进行调整。
1
Hi, my name is Kara Wiseman.
2
I'm a PhD student in developmental psychology at Stanford.
3
I study social cognitive development, focusing on how young children and adults think about concepts like consciousness, sentience, and personhood.
4
Today, I'm going to be talking to you about a very influential idea in developmental psychology, that babies are born with what researchers call core knowledge.
5
Some researchers think that infants mostly rely on all -purpose mechanisms for learning about the world.
6
These mechanisms are domain general, meaning that they can be applied to everything from learning about the physical world,
7
to understanding numbers, to figuring out social relationships.
8
Other researchers think that infants are born with more domain -specific ways of making sense of their experiences.
9
They think that infants are born with a handful of distinct cognitive systems for reasoning about different parts of the world.
10
This perspective is called the theory of core knowledge.
11
On this theory, the human mind contains a few, maybe five or six, core knowledge systems,
12
and each one is responsible for dealing with just a small chunk of the world.
13
Here's one well -studied example of a core knowledge system, the core object system.
14
The core object system supports reasoning about objects, like rocks or strawberries or basketballs, and the laws of physics that govern them.
15
This system, like other core knowledge systems, is characterized by a handful of key principles, specific pieces of knowledge that guide reasoning in this domain.
16
In the core object system, one of these key principles is the principle of cohesion.
17
Objects should hold together across time and space, rather than disintegrating.
18
Objects should also obey the principle of continuity, that is, they should move along continuous paths through time and space,
19
rather than appearing and disappearing at random.
20
Finally, there's the principle of contact.
21
Objects should only start to move when something else touches them, and not without being touched.
22
The reason these three key principles, cohesion, continuity, and contact,
23
are said to characterize the core object system is
24
because studies have shown that infants expect objects to behave according to these principles and are surprised when objects violate them.
25
Another important part of the core object system and other core knowledge systems is that it is characterized by signature limits,
26
situations in which the system falls apart.
27
Studies with both young infants and adults have demonstrated
28
that the core object system can keep track of about three to four of these objects at a time, but not more.
29
And it doesn't do well with things like piles of sand, liquids, or other substances, which violate the key principle of cohesion.
30
This can lead to some pretty funny experimental findings, like young infants seeming not to notice when a single pile of sand goes behind a curtain,
31
and then have somehow turned into two separate piles of sand when the curtain is raised.
32
So far, research indicates that there are about five or six of these core knowledge systems,
33
each of which has its own set of key principles and signature limits.
34
The core object system is one of the best studied, but there is also extensive research on a core number system,
35
supporting reasoning about quantity and keeping track of how many things there are in some context.
36
A core agent system, supporting reasoning about creatures that act autonomously to pursue their goals,
37
a core place system, supporting navigation around an environment, and a core system for shape or form, supporting representation of the shapes of objects.
38
Recently, some researchers have also speculated about a core knowledge system for social partners, supporting reasoning about social interactions and relationships.
39
This is still an active area of research.
40
Core knowledge theorists argue that these core systems are innate, present at birth rather than learned over time,
41
and that the systems are shared across many species, rather than being unique to humans.
42
Researchers have converged on these conclusions from a few different angles.
43
Many researchers conduct studies with humans of different ages, including research with newborn infants, with older infants as they gain more experience and skills,
44
with toddlers as they become fluent speakers of their language.
45
with school children, as they are explicitly instructed in arithmetic, geometry, manners, and other subjects, and with adults.
46
Another research approach has been to compare performance across species, including not only humans, but also non -human primates,
47
newly hatched chicks, zebrafish, and even ants.
48
Finally, researchers sometimes compare performance across different cultural contexts that vary in the languages people use, the everyday environments that people experience,
49
and the values and beliefs that people hold.
50
For example, lots of research has compared people living in highly industrialized urban centers like
51
San Francisco or Beijing to people living in isolated indigenous communities in rural Papua New Guinea or the Amazonian rainforest.
52
Across many of these studies, participants of different ages, species,
53
and cultural contexts have all shown similar sensitivities to the key principles and signature limits of each of the core knowledge systems,
54
leading some researchers to argue that these systems are likely to be innate and species general.
55
Other researchers disagree.
56
It's important to note that the theory of core knowledge does not claim to explain all of human cognition.
57
Core knowledge theorists would not claim
58
that there are an infinite number of core knowledge systems for all the different chunks of the world
59
we might reason about or interact with, or that there are core knowledge systems for things like computers or astrophysics,
60
which have no plausible role in evolutionary history.
61
Instead, researchers in this tradition view the small handful of core knowledge systems as fundamental building blocks that, over the course of learning and development,
62
combine to help us reason about more and more complex concepts like computers, astrophysics, and minds.
63
For more on the topic of core knowledge, check out these papers.
64
Thank you.
FOR YOU
推荐视频
本课的词汇与口语要点
这节口语课以视频“Core Knowledge”为素材。 视频中反复出现的词有:core, knowledge, object, principle, researchers。 这段视频共有 35 个句子、982 个单词可供跟读。 讲话部分时长为 7:02。 说话人语速平稳,每分钟约 140 个词,很适合跟读。 只有 79% 的单词属于英语最常用的 3,000 词,词汇难度较高。
视频中的重点词汇
视频中 15 个值得学习的单词,附发音和释义:
| 单词 | 发音 | 释义 |
|---|---|---|
| principle 名词 | /ˈpɹɪn.sɪ.pəl/ | 原理, 原則 /原则 |
| researcher 名词 | /ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/ | 研究員 /研究员, 研究者 |
| compare 动词 | /kəmˈpɛɚ/ | 比, 比較 /比较 |
| sand 名词 | /sænd/ | 沙, 沙子 |
| domain 名词 | /ˌdəʊˈmeɪ̯n/ | 領域 /领域 |
| signature 名词 | /ˈsɪɡ.nə.t͡ʃə/ | 簽字 /签字, 簽名 /签名 |
| pile 名词 | /paɪl/ | 堆 |
| handful 名词 | /ˈhæn(d)fʊl/ | 少數 /少数 |
| argue 动词 | /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/ | 辯論 /辩论, 爭辯 /争辩 |
| psychology 名词 | /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/ | 心理學 /心理学 |
| mechanism 名词 | /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/ | 機械 /机械, 機構 /机构 |
| cognitive 形容词 | /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/ | 認知的 /认知的 |
| curtain 名词 | /ˈkɜɹt(ə)n/ | 窗簾 /窗帘, 簾子 /帘子 |
| violate 动词 | /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/ | 違反 /违反, 違犯 /违犯 |
| chunk 名词 | /t͡ʃʌŋk/ | 塊 /块 |
视频中出现的短语动词
| 单词 | 释义 |
|---|---|
| check out 动词 | 退房 |
| figure out 动词 | 弄清楚 |
视频中的语法
说话人最常用的结构,并附上视频中的原话:
| 结构 | 视频中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 被动语态 be + 过去分词 — 强调发生了什么,而不是谁做的 | are born · can be applied · is called |
| 现在完成时 have/has + 过去分词 — 过去发生但与现在仍有关联的事 | have shown · have demonstrated · have also speculated |
需要注意的发音
说话人用了 3 次缩略和弱读形式,例如 I'm, doesn't。请按听到的简短形式来说。
- “th” 音: theorist /ˈθiːəɹəst/, arithmetic /æɹɪθˈmɛtɪk/
- “sh” 和 “zh” 音: conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, interaction /ˌɪn.təˈɹæk.ʃən/, consciousness /ˈkɑnʃəsnəs/, influential /ɪnflʊˈɛnʃəl/
- 长单词——注意重音位置: psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, mechanism /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/, developmental /dɪˌvɛləpˈmɛntəl/, continuity /ˌkɑn.tɪˈn(j)u.ə.ti/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/
中文母语者容易读错的音:
- /v/ — 不要读成 /w/,上齿轻触下唇: cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, developmental /dɪˌvɛləpˈmɛntəl/, violate /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/, everyday /ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/, vary /ˈvɛəɹi/
- 词尾辅音 — 要读清楚,后面不要加元音: sand /sænd/, cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, violate /ˈvaɪəˌleɪt/, chunk /t͡ʃʌŋk/, topic /ˈtɑpɪk/
- /r/ 和 /l/ 的区别: principle /ˈpɹɪn.sɪ.pəl/, rely /ɹɪˈlaɪ/, experimental /ɪkspɛɹəˈmɛntəl/, evolutionary /ˌiː.vəˈluː.ʃən.ɛɹ.i/, industrialize /ɪnˈdʌstɹiəlaɪz/
如何用这段视频练习
- 先完整听一遍视频,不要开口,记下不认识的单词。
- 用正常速度逐句跟读,每句重复到你的节奏与说话人一致为止。
- 录下自己的声音并与原声对比,特别注意 principle, researcher, compare 这类单词。
什么是跟读法?
跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧,最初开发用于专业口译员的培训,并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大:您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同,跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性,语调,节奏,连读,听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。












