Pratique du Shadowing: Why Do We Stay in Relationships That Hurt Us? - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

Choisissez un mode d'entraînement

Chaque mode ouvre une salle d'entraînement en plein écran.

86 phrases

Si les phrases sont trop courtes ou trop longues, cliquez sur Edit pour les ajuster.

Most people who stay in relationships that are hurting them aren't confused about it.

They know something is wrong.

They've thought about leaving.

They probably told themselves they were going to leave.

And then they didn't.

And from the outside, that looks like a choice that doesn't make sense.

But the psychology behind it is a lot more complicated than just, why don't you leave?

And understanding it says, something pretty uncomfortable about how human beings are wired.

The first piece of this is attachment theory, which actually begins in the first few years of your life,

long before any adult relationship enters the picture.

When you're an infant, you form an attachment style based on how your caregivers respond to you.

If your needs were met consistently, if comfort arrived when you needed it, if the people around you were reliable,

you likely developed what psychologists call a secure attachment style.

You learned that relationships are safe, that people can be trusted, that closeness isn't dangerous.

But if your early environment was inconsistent, if comfort sometimes arrived and sometimes didn't,

if the people around you were warm sometimes and distant or frightening other times, you developed an anxious or avoidant attachment style instead.

And here's the key thing.

Those patterns don't stay in childhood.

They follow you directly into your adult relationships.

Someone with an anxious attachment style tends to crave closeness intensely, fear abandonment deeply, and stay in relationships well past the point they should

because the threat of being alone feels worse than the reality of being unhappy.

And because a relationship that is unpredictable and inconsistent actually feels familiar to them in a way that a stable, healthy relationship sometimes doesn't.

Then there's the sunk cost fallacy, which is one of the most well -documented cognitive biases in psychology

and one of the most brutal when it shows up in relationships.

The sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to keep investing in something that's clearly failing, driven entirely by how much you've already put in.

You finish a movie you hate because you've already watched half of it.

You stay at a job that's making you miserable because you've been there for years.

The logic is, I've put too much in to walk away now, even when walking away would clearly be the better choice.

In relationships, this gets enormously complicated because what you've invested goes far beyond time.

It's memories, emotional labour, years of your life, plans you built together, a version of your future that involved this person.

Leaving means losing all of that the relationship, the history, the identity you built inside it, and the belief that the time you gave meant something.

So people stay because leaving feels like admitting that everything they invested was wasted.

And that particular loss is one the brain resists very strongly.

But probably the most misunderstood piece of all of this is trauma bonding, because it's the one that looks most irrational from the outside

and makes the most sense once you understand the psychology underneath it.

Trauma bonding happens in relationships with a specific pattern, cycles of tension, harm and then relief.

The relationship isn't consistently bad.

If it were, leaving would be easier.

What makes it so hard to leave is the alternation.

The periods where things are bad, followed by periods where things are good again, followed by bad again, followed by good.

The apology after the fight, the kindness that follows the cruelty, the version of the person who shows up after the version who hurts you.

Psychologists call this intermittent reinforcement and it is one of the most powerful forces in behavioral psychology.

The brain doesn't bond most strongly to things that reward it consistently.

It bonds most strongly to things that reward it unpredictably.

A slot machine keeps people playing because it pays out sometimes.

Randomly, unpredictably, just enough to keep you pulling the lever.

Consistent rewards would actually make it less addictive.

A relationship that is sometimes wonderful and sometimes terrible creates the same neurological pull.

The good moments hit harder precisely because they're surrounded by bad ones.

And the brain locks onto those good moments, keeps returning to them, keeps chasing them.

Because the relief of the good after the bad is one of the most intense emotional experiences humans can have.

This is why people in these relationships often describe being unable to leave even when they want to.

The bond runs below logic, it's neurological.

There's also the identity question, which doesn't get talked about enough.

When you've been in a relationship for a long time, especially one that's involved control or emotional manipulation,

your sense of who you are can become deeply intertwined with the relationship itself.

You stop knowing clearly what you think, what you want, what you value outside of this dynamic,

because over time those things were gradually defined for you by someone else.

This is sometimes called the loss of authentic self, and it means that leaving can feel genuinely disorienting on top of being painful,

because the relationship has become so much of how you understand yourself that you don't fully know who you'd be without it.

Leaving would require rebuilding an identity that's been slowly eroded, sometimes over years.

And that's a task that feels enormous when you're already exhausted.

And then underneath all of this is something even more fundamental,

which is that the brain experiences social rejection and loss using many of the same neural pathways as physical pain.

Loneliness is not a metaphor.

A threat of losing a relationship activates the same alarm systems as a physical threat to your safety.

Which means that for someone with an anxious attachment style

or someone who has been made to feel over time that they are lucky to be loved at all,

the prospect of leaving can trigger a genuine fear response.

Something that feels less like, this would be sad and closer to, I will not survive this.

Rational arguments don't reach

that place knowing something is bad for you doesn't automatically override a fear response that's running at that level.

The people who ask, why don't you just leave, are usually asking from a place that has never experienced that particular fear at that particular intensity.

And if they had, they'd understand why the answer isn't simple.

So why do people stay in relationships that are bad for them?

Because their attachment system was formed in an environment that may in consistency feel like home.

Because leaving means surrendering everything they've already invested because the cycle of bad

and good has created a bond that isn't about logic,

because their identity has become so wrapped up in their relationship that leaving means not knowing who they are, and because the fear of loss is,

for a lot of people, genuinely one of the most activating experiences the nervous system can produce.

Understanding the psychology doesn't excuse the relationship, it just makes clear that the people inside these situations aren't failing to see something obvious.

They are caught inside a set of mechanisms that are genuinely very difficult to override.

Mechanisms that, in other contexts, are the same ones that make humans capable of deep loyalty, strong attachment and lasting love.

The same wiring that makes us bond so deeply is the wiring that makes it so hard to let go.

Subscribe if this explains something you couldn't quite put words to before.

I'll see you in the next one.

Télécharger l'application

Tout pour parler couramment

Prononciation IAChaque phrase notée

Phonétique (IPA)Maîtrisez chaque son

VocabulaireEnrichissez votre lexique

Jeu de vocabulaireApprenez en jouant

Scanner le QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

Vidéo recommandée

50 phrases

Why You Keep Taking the People You Love for Granted | Tony Robbins Full Intervention

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

Vocabulaire et conseils d’expression pour cette leçon

Cette leçon d’expression orale s’appuie sur la vidéo « Why Do We Stay in Relationships That Hurt Us? ». Les mots qui reviennent le plus souvent : relationship, leaving, attachment, psychology, bond. Cette vidéo contient 86 phrases et 1253 mots à répéter en shadowing. La partie parlée dure 6:44. Le locuteur parle vite, environ 186 mots par minute : attendez-vous à des liaisons et à des sons réduits. 83 % des mots font partie des 3 000 mots les plus courants en anglais ; le reste mérite d’être vu avant de commencer.

Vocabulaire clé de cette vidéo

15 mots de la vidéo à retenir, avec leur prononciation et leur sens :

Mot	Prononciation	Sens
attachment nom	/əˈtæt͡ʃmənt/	attachement
psychology nom	/saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	psychologie
invest verbe	/ɪnˈvɛst/	investir, consacrer
strongly adverbe	/ˈstɹɔŋli/	fort, fortement
deeply adverbe	/ˈdi(ː)pli/	profondément
wire nom	/ˈwaɪɚ/	fil
reward nom	/ɹɪˈwɔɹd/	récompense, salaire
genuinely adverbe	/ˈd͡ʒɛn.ju.ɪn.li/	authentiquement, réellement
anxious adjectif	/ˈæŋkʃəs/	inquiet
complicated adjectif	/ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/	compliqué, alambiqué
comfort nom	/ˈkʌm.fət/	confort
arrive verbe	/əˈɹaɪv/	arriver
mechanism nom	/ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/	mécanisme
sink verbe	/ˈsɪŋk/	couler, s'enfoncer
trauma nom	/ˈtɹɔm.ə/	traumatisme, trauma

Les verbes à particule que vous entendrez

Mot	Sens
show up verbe	apparaître, se montrer se pointer

La grammaire de cette vidéo

Les structures que le locuteur utilise le plus, avec les mots exacts de la vidéo :

Structure	Dans la vidéo
Phrases conditionnelles if + proposition, will/would + verbe — une condition et son résultat	If it were, leaving would be · if they had, they'd understand
Present perfect have/has + participe passé — une action passée qui compte encore maintenant	They've thought · you've already put · you've already watched
Voix passive be + participe passé — l’accent est mis sur ce qui arrive, pas sur qui le fait	are wired · were met · can be trusted
Propositions relatives who / which + proposition — une précision sur une personne ou une chose	people who stay · fallacy, which is · person who shows

Prononciation à surveiller

Le locuteur utilise 34 contractions et formes réduites, comme doesn't, don't, you've. Prononcez-les sous leur forme courte, telles que vous les entendez.

Les sons « th »: underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/, authentic /ɔˈθɛn.tɪk/, pathway /ˈpæθˌweɪ/
Les sons « sh » et « zh »: anxious /ˈæŋkʃəs/, tension /ˈtɛnʃən/, rational /ˈɹæʃ(ə)nəl/, rejection /ɹɪˈd͡ʒɛkʃən/, manipulation /məˌnɪp.juˈleɪ.ʃən/
Mots longs — placez bien l’accent: psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, consistently /kənˈsɪstəntli/, genuinely /ˈd͡ʒɛn.ju.ɪn.li/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, mechanism /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/

Les sons difficiles pour les francophones :

/h/ — il se souffle, il n’est pas muet: harm /hɑːm/, unhappy /ʌnˈhæpi/, behavioral /bɪˈheɪvjəɹəl/
/tʃ/ et /dʒ/ — à ne pas adoucir en « ch » et « j »: attachment /əˈtæt͡ʃmənt/, psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, genuinely /ˈd͡ʒɛn.ju.ɪn.li/, psychologist /ˌsaɪˈkɑl.ə.d͡ʒɪst/, neurological /nɝəˈlɑd͡ʒɪkəl/
/r/ anglais — langue recourbée, sans frotter la gorge: strongly /ˈstɹɔŋli/, reward /ɹɪˈwɔɹd/, arrive /əˈɹaɪv/, trauma /ˈtɹɔm.ə/, reliable /ɹɪˈlaɪəbl̩/

Comment s’entraîner avec cette vidéo

Écoutez la vidéo en entier une fois sans parler et notez les mots que vous ne connaissez pas.
Commencez à la vitesse 0,75×, répétez phrase par phrase, puis revenez à la vitesse normale quand cela devient facile.
Enregistrez-vous et comparez avec l’original, en faisant attention à des mots comme attachment, psychology, invest.

Qu'est-ce que la technique du Shadowing ?

Le Shadowing est une technique d'apprentissage des langues fondée sur la science, développée à l'origine pour la formation des interprètes professionnels. Le principe est simple mais puissant : vous écoutez de l'anglais natif et le répétez immédiatement à voix haute — comme une ombre suivant le locuteur avec un décalage de 1 à 2 secondes. Les recherches montrent une amélioration significative de la précision de la prononciation, de l'intonation, du rythme, des liaisons, de la compréhension orale et de la fluidité.

Technique du shadowing : lire le guide complet étape par étape →

Pratique du Shadowing: Why Do We Stay in Relationships That Hurt Us? - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo

Choisissez un mode d'entraînement

Télécharger l'application

Why Hurt People Hurt People

How To Rewire Your Brain | Andrew Huberman Motivation

Fawning: The Survival Strategy That Turns Into Self-Abandonment | Fawning #2

When an Anxious Attachment Dates an Avoidant

Why She Chose Excitement Over Stability

Why We Can't Save Those We Love

Psychology Of People Who Hate Themselves (But Kind To Others)

Why You Want to Run Away From a Good RelationshipThe "Fear of

Sam Harris basically breaks down the secret to life (again)

Why We Choose the Partners We Choose

3 ways smart people stay stuck in failing patterns | Anne-Laure Le Cunff