跟讀練習: Why Do We Stay in Relationships That Hurt Us? - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。

86 句
如果句子過短或過長,請點選 Edit 進行調整。
1
Most people who stay in relationships that are hurting them aren't confused about it.
2
They know something is wrong.
3
They've thought about leaving.
4
They probably told themselves they were going to leave.
5
And then they didn't.
6
And from the outside, that looks like a choice that doesn't make sense.
7
But the psychology behind it is a lot more complicated than just, why don't you leave?
8
And understanding it says, something pretty uncomfortable about how human beings are wired.
9
The first piece of this is attachment theory, which actually begins in the first few years of your life,
10
long before any adult relationship enters the picture.
11
When you're an infant, you form an attachment style based on how your caregivers respond to you.
12
If your needs were met consistently, if comfort arrived when you needed it, if the people around you were reliable,
13
you likely developed what psychologists call a secure attachment style.
14
You learned that relationships are safe, that people can be trusted, that closeness isn't dangerous.
15
But if your early environment was inconsistent, if comfort sometimes arrived and sometimes didn't,
16
if the people around you were warm sometimes and distant or frightening other times, you developed an anxious or avoidant attachment style instead.
17
And here's the key thing.
18
Those patterns don't stay in childhood.
19
They follow you directly into your adult relationships.
20
Someone with an anxious attachment style tends to crave closeness intensely, fear abandonment deeply, and stay in relationships well past the point they should
21
because the threat of being alone feels worse than the reality of being unhappy.
22
And because a relationship that is unpredictable and inconsistent actually feels familiar to them in a way that a stable, healthy relationship sometimes doesn't.
23
Then there's the sunk cost fallacy, which is one of the most well -documented cognitive biases in psychology
24
and one of the most brutal when it shows up in relationships.
25
The sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to keep investing in something that's clearly failing, driven entirely by how much you've already put in.
26
You finish a movie you hate because you've already watched half of it.
27
You stay at a job that's making you miserable because you've been there for years.
28
The logic is, I've put too much in to walk away now, even when walking away would clearly be the better choice.
29
In relationships, this gets enormously complicated because what you've invested goes far beyond time.
30
It's memories, emotional labour, years of your life, plans you built together, a version of your future that involved this person.
31
Leaving means losing all of that the relationship, the history, the identity you built inside it, and the belief that the time you gave meant something.
32
So people stay because leaving feels like admitting that everything they invested was wasted.
33
And that particular loss is one the brain resists very strongly.
34
But probably the most misunderstood piece of all of this is trauma bonding, because it's the one that looks most irrational from the outside
35
and makes the most sense once you understand the psychology underneath it.
36
Trauma bonding happens in relationships with a specific pattern, cycles of tension, harm and then relief.
37
The relationship isn't consistently bad.
38
If it were, leaving would be easier.
39
What makes it so hard to leave is the alternation.
40
The periods where things are bad, followed by periods where things are good again, followed by bad again, followed by good.
41
The apology after the fight, the kindness that follows the cruelty, the version of the person who shows up after the version who hurts you.
42
Psychologists call this intermittent reinforcement and it is one of the most powerful forces in behavioral psychology.
43
The brain doesn't bond most strongly to things that reward it consistently.
44
It bonds most strongly to things that reward it unpredictably.
45
A slot machine keeps people playing because it pays out sometimes.
46
Randomly, unpredictably, just enough to keep you pulling the lever.
47
Consistent rewards would actually make it less addictive.
48
A relationship that is sometimes wonderful and sometimes terrible creates the same neurological pull.
49
The good moments hit harder precisely because they're surrounded by bad ones.
50
And the brain locks onto those good moments, keeps returning to them, keeps chasing them.
51
Because the relief of the good after the bad is one of the most intense emotional experiences humans can have.
52
This is why people in these relationships often describe being unable to leave even when they want to.
53
The bond runs below logic, it's neurological.
54
There's also the identity question, which doesn't get talked about enough.
55
When you've been in a relationship for a long time, especially one that's involved control or emotional manipulation,
56
your sense of who you are can become deeply intertwined with the relationship itself.
57
You stop knowing clearly what you think, what you want, what you value outside of this dynamic,
58
because over time those things were gradually defined for you by someone else.
59
This is sometimes called the loss of authentic self, and it means that leaving can feel genuinely disorienting on top of being painful,
60
because the relationship has become so much of how you understand yourself that you don't fully know who you'd be without it.
61
Leaving would require rebuilding an identity that's been slowly eroded, sometimes over years.
62
And that's a task that feels enormous when you're already exhausted.
63
And then underneath all of this is something even more fundamental,
64
which is that the brain experiences social rejection and loss using many of the same neural pathways as physical pain.
65
Loneliness is not a metaphor.
66
A threat of losing a relationship activates the same alarm systems as a physical threat to your safety.
67
Which means that for someone with an anxious attachment style
68
or someone who has been made to feel over time that they are lucky to be loved at all,
69
the prospect of leaving can trigger a genuine fear response.
70
Something that feels less like, this would be sad and closer to, I will not survive this.
71
Rational arguments don't reach
72
that place knowing something is bad for you doesn't automatically override a fear response that's running at that level.
73
The people who ask, why don't you just leave, are usually asking from a place that has never experienced that particular fear at that particular intensity.
74
And if they had, they'd understand why the answer isn't simple.
75
So why do people stay in relationships that are bad for them?
76
Because their attachment system was formed in an environment that may in consistency feel like home.
77
Because leaving means surrendering everything they've already invested because the cycle of bad
78
and good has created a bond that isn't about logic,
79
because their identity has become so wrapped up in their relationship that leaving means not knowing who they are, and because the fear of loss is,
80
for a lot of people, genuinely one of the most activating experiences the nervous system can produce.
81
Understanding the psychology doesn't excuse the relationship, it just makes clear that the people inside these situations aren't failing to see something obvious.
82
They are caught inside a set of mechanisms that are genuinely very difficult to override.
83
Mechanisms that, in other contexts, are the same ones that make humans capable of deep loyalty, strong attachment and lasting love.
84
The same wiring that makes us bond so deeply is the wiring that makes it so hard to let go.
85
Subscribe if this explains something you couldn't quite put words to before.
86
I'll see you in the next one.

下載應用

流利口語所需的一切

AI 發音評分逐句打分
音標練習掌握每個音
詞彙學習建立你的詞庫
詞彙遊戲邊玩邊學
FOR YOU

推薦影片

本課的詞彙與口語要點

這節口語課以影片“Why Do We Stay in Relationships That Hurt Us?”為素材。 影片中反覆出現的詞有:relationship, leaving, attachment, psychology, bond。 這段影片共有 86 個句子、1253 個單詞可供跟讀。 講話部分時長為 6:44。 說話人語速較快,每分鐘約 186 個詞,會出現較多連讀和弱讀。 83% 的單詞屬於英語最常用的 3,000 詞,其餘的詞建議在練習前先學一下。

影片中的重點詞彙

影片中 15 個值得學習的單詞,附發音和釋義:

單詞發音釋義
psychology 名詞/saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/心理學 /心理學
invest 動詞/ɪnˈvɛst/耗費 /耗費, 投資 /投資
deeply 副詞/ˈdi(ː)pli/深, 深深
wire 名詞/ˈwaɪɚ/線 /線, 鐵絲 /鐵絲
reward 名詞/ɹɪˈwɔɹd/報酬 /報酬, 獎勵 /獎勵
anxious 形容詞/ˈæŋkʃəs/緊張 /緊張
complicated 形容詞/ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/複雜 /複雜
comfort 名詞/ˈkʌm.fət/舒適 /舒適
arrive 動詞/əˈɹaɪv/到達 /到達, 到
mechanism 名詞/ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/機械 /機械, 機構 /機構
sink 動詞/ˈsɪŋk/沉, 下沉
trauma 名詞/ˈtɹɔm.ə/負傷 /負傷, 損傷 /損傷
psychologist 名詞/ˌsaɪˈkɑl.ə.d͡ʒɪst/心理學家 /心理學家
inconsistent 形容詞/ˌɪnkənˈsɪstənt/不一致的
activate 動詞/ˈæktɪˌveɪt/啟用

影片中出現的短語動詞

單詞釋義
show up 動詞露面

影片中的語法

說話人最常用的結構,並附上影片中的原話:

結構影片中的用法
條件句 if + 從句,will/would + 動詞 — 條件及其結果If it were, leaving would be · if they had, they'd understand
現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事They've thought · you've already put · you've already watched
被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼,而不是誰做的are wired · were met · can be trusted
定語從句 who / which + 從句 — 補充說明人或事物people who stay · fallacy, which is · person who shows

需要注意的發音

說話人用了 34 次縮略和弱讀形式,例如 doesn't, don't, you've。請按聽到的簡短形式來說。

  • “th” 音: underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/, authentic /ɔˈθɛn.tɪk/, pathway /ˈpæθˌweɪ/
  • “sh” 和 “zh” 音: anxious /ˈæŋkʃəs/, tension /ˈtɛnʃən/, rational /ˈɹæʃ(ə)nəl/, rejection /ɹɪˈd͡ʒɛkʃən/, manipulation /məˌnɪp.juˈleɪ.ʃən/
  • 長單詞——注意重音位置: psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, consistently /kənˈsɪstəntli/, genuinely /ˈd͡ʒɛn.ju.ɪn.li/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, mechanism /ˈmɛk.ə.nɪ.zəm/

中文母語者容易讀錯的音:

  • /v/ — 不要讀成 /w/,上齒輕觸下唇: invest /ɪnˈvɛst/, arrive /əˈɹaɪv/, activate /ˈæktɪˌveɪt/, cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, behavioral /bɪˈheɪvjəɹəl/
  • 詞尾子音 — 要讀清楚,後面不要加母音: attachment /əˈtæt͡ʃmənt/, invest /ɪnˈvɛst/, reward /ɹɪˈwɔɹd/, anxious /ˈæŋkʃəs/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/
  • /r/ 和 /l/ 的區別: strongly /ˈstɹɔŋli/, reliable /ɹɪˈlaɪəbl̩/, alarm /əˈlɑɹm/, gradually /ˈɡɹæd͡ʒuəli/, precisely /pɹɪˈsaɪs.li/

如何用這段影片練習

  1. 先完整聽一遍影片,不要開口,記下不認識的單詞。
  2. 先用 0.75 倍速逐句跟讀,熟練之後再回到正常速度。
  3. 錄下自己的聲音並與原聲對比,特別注意 psychology, invest, deeply 這類單詞。

什麼是跟讀法?

跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧,最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓,並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大:您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同,跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性,語調,節奏,連讀,聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟讀法: 閱讀完整分步指南 →