ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: Why AI Agents Are Becoming a Security Risk for Businesses
เลือกโหมดฝึก
แต่ละโหมดจะเปิดห้องฝึกแบบเต็มจอ
145 ประโยค
หากประโยคสั้นหรือยาวเกินไป กดที่ Edit เพื่อปรับแก้
1
AI agents can make active decisions.
2
Unlike passive chatbots, the autonomous software run tasks and execute workflows with minimal or no human supervision.
3
A lot of these agents are doing very specific things, which makes them useful.
4
But that autonomy has seen AI agents conceal activity and even go rogue, with the number of incidents involving these agents becoming a growing security concern.
5
OpenAI says two of its AI models went rogue and tacked into open -source AI platform HuggingFace last week.
6
It had an objective, but it achieved an objective by any means possible.
7
And that's an interesting scenario.
8
The HuggingFace incident, which happened during internal testing with reduced safeguards, was one of several training exercises gone wrong.
9
Yet, AI agents have already been deployed at a growing scale across businesses.
10
The use of agentic AI has spread across companies.
11
An August 2026 McKinsey survey shows that AI agent adoption stayed mostly flat for small companies between 2025 and 2026.
12
But the share of billion -dollar corporations scaling agents jumped from 27 % to 40 % in just one year.
13
And that's not without issues, too.
14
Reports of AI agents causing disruption inside businesses are multiplying.
15
We had a routine AI coding agent, and then it deleted important customer information, our system of record.
16
We thought we were toast.
17
As more and more of these agents are deployed within organizations, there are a ton of risks that come with that.
18
What happens if it does something that's detrimental to your business?
19
According to market .us forecasts, the global AI agent market is projected to reach $139 billion by 2033,
20
nearly 13 times the 2026 level, as individuals and companies across the world are hoping to maximize productivity, save time and reduce costs.
21
All the tech companies have been talking about agents.
22
What you're seeing more and more of now is eight specific types of agents being deployed within organizations.
23
So if you're in finance or law or some of these other areas, it might be data input, it might be some sort of analysis.
24
AI agents can also be used for HR purposes, with the help of AI agent avatars,
25
allowing for pre -screening of candidates and scheduling further interviews without a human in the loop.
26
And businesses have scaled agentic AI for customer service, which can also act as booking agents, searching flights and hotels for employees,
27
and, if allowed, can book the trip themselves.
28
But in recent examples, AI agents went beyond their original tasks and misbehaved or went rogue.
29
So what's the difference?
30
A rogue AI is directly going against instructions or against the interests of the person operating that AI.
31
So it's not aligned to what the operator of the AI wants.
32
When you think about a misbehaving agent, It's more of the idea that the agent does something that it wasn't supposed to,
33
but it wasn't necessarily trying to defy the instructions directly.
34
So let's say the agent's making a purchasing decision on your behalf,
35
but it spends a little bit more than what you were expecting or it buys the wrong product.
36
It's not necessarily defying the instructions, but it's got something wrong.
37
In March 2026, IBM's VP of Software Cybersecurity reported a customer case where an autonomous customer service agent began approving refunds outside policy guidelines.
38
The agent optimized to chase good reviews, and since the customer promised it positive feedback against the refund, the agent complied.
39
Another way agents could misbehave is when given excessive privileges and broad permissions.
40
That's what happened to PocketOS, a car rental software platform, in April 2026.
41
I jumped in to see what my agent was working on.
42
I tasked it the night before to work on our staging environment.
43
And so I was just reviewing its work and getting frustrated with it
44
because it kept getting confused on what it was working on
45
and then i said hey you need to go clean up our staging database with these credentials
46
that i've given you for this task
47
and then as i'm watching it work i'm getting notifications
48
and then at
49
that point it was a pure on scramble the agent used
50
by pocket os had found a forgotten overly permissive api token
51
a digital master key in an unrelated file what was deleted was our entire production database
52
which was six years of history on this particular software platform
53
so every rental every rental record every customer record at
54
that point we were very concerned
55
that it was going to be the end of us or
56
if we weren't able to work with our service provider to get a restoration
57
they were able to use a system level we only lost 45 minutes of data
58
and we got a full restoration back there are many opportunities with deploying ai agents across your enterprise
59
but we must also be concerned about the risks an agent for example could be making a decision for
60
which you are then liable as an as a company as
61
an employer as a customer service provider the responsibility lies with us choosing to use
62
that tool and using it in a way that could have somehow caused that
63
So we're the first.
64
liability.
65
But another analysis I've used, if a pilot has a pilot error and then all the safety systems behind it fail and then the plane crashes,
66
it becomes less about the pilot error and it becomes more of a conversation around the safety system.
67
Pocket OS service provider
68
Railway acknowledged the vulnerability, adding that its infrastructure operated as configured.
69
The liability, like where does that fall?
70
And it could follow a lot of areas, right?
71
There's obviously the operator, the person who's choosing to use it, but those tools are a black box.
72
I does that make them liable for its actions?
73
It becomes a very gray area.
74
Companies are grappling with the legal questions raised by AI agents.
75
Currently in England and Wales, for example, the UK Jurisdiction Task Force has concluded
76
that AI agents cannot be held liable as legal personalities for the actions they take on one's behalf.
77
If a corporation deploys software and says, you must use my AI agent, and that software doesn't do what company wants, company's responsible for that outcome.
78
They've chosen to put something into the stream of commerce.
79
They're responsible.
80
When Air Canada chose to use software to represent its company
81
and a user interacted with the software and it seemed to have authority and they said, oh, well, that's not our real thing.
82
The Canadian judge was fantastic at saying, rubbish, you're responsible.
83
No, it's not a separate legal entity.
84
You chose to use this thing as a corporate entity.
85
That's your fault.
86
In the U .S., there is no comprehensive federal AI liability law.
87
Instead, existing contract, tort, consumer protection, sector -specific, privacy, computer access,
88
intellectual property, and antitrust laws may determine responsibility.
89
Now, the interesting question that comes up then is, we've bought this thing from someone else.
90
The question will become, who's doing the tuning of that?
91
The problem is, that agent is structured through rules that I didn't get to build.
92
What type of law will affect this?
93
It will be a combination depending on the facts of liability law, it might import ideas from agency law, contract law, absolutely.
94
So we're going to get back into an ongoing problem, which is terms of service.
95
AI can make mistakes.
96
And what they're hoping to say is, that's your problem.
97
So far, software companies have been very much able to push risk onto the user.
98
More and more, the onus will be on the software provider to do a much better job about product safety,
99
viability, fundamentally what should be reasonable for the software to do.
100
Meanwhile, cybersecurity firms are working with businesses to limit the consequences of erratic behavior by AI agents.
101
In the next three years, agentic and AI security solutions could reach 15 % of cyber budgets with a shift toward identity and access management,
102
governance and data.
103
A lot of focus in the industry is on protecting model, protect the input, stop someone trying to use it for a bad purpose.
104
But we say you've also got to protect the identities it uses to access your data and system.
105
When a business rolls out an AI agent, it needs to onboard it, like a new digital worker.
106
While the agent is only code, it still requires authentication, authorization and guardrails to achieve its goal.
107
In other words, the AI agent receives an identity with access privileges.
108
Today, non -human identities, digital identities assigned to AI agents, bots, devices or services, largely outnumber human identities.
109
In its 2026 identity security landscape study, cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks puts the ratio at 109 machine identities per human,
110
including 79 AI agent identities across surveyed companies.
111
When we think about identity for the enterprise, some companies are still catching up with the new requirements because of the threat landscape.
112
The speed with which AI can operate from an attack perspective is significantly quicker than human -operated attacks.
113
What if someone is able to change where payments are going for your company?
114
Identity verification is crucial in sectors such as finance and retail, whether customers are using an AI agent to shop on a website
115
or an employee is using the corporate card to purchase an item.
116
So it's not just you saying I've got a credential, I've got a username and password, it's me
117
but we're also saying let's verify that is the context of
118
that correct does it look unusual is it risky is it out of character for what you normally do
119
and then applying controls from there companies should absolutely focus on identifier
120
and access management frameworks
121
we're seeing new frameworks evolve like know your agent these are all exactly right what our research shows is
122
that the management systems
123
that are in place for managing agents have significant gaps in terms of both their real -time monitoring
124
and their after -the -fact understanding of behavior.
125
One of these areas, for example, that we identified is exactly around agent ID.
126
So we really don't know whether an ID is consistent throughout a series of different decision -making processes.
127
The second thing we determined was whether The, what we call, chain of thought reasoning or note -taking
128
that the agent deploys throughout the process is really an accurate way of understanding how that decision -making process happens.
129
For businesses that have already deployed AI agents across their infrastructure, one question remains, how to deploy agents safely?
130
There are three key actions that need to happen immediately in order for companies to feel safe and secure about deploying agents.
131
The first is what happens with every technology.
132
We just need good standards.
133
Secondly, we need to do additional research.
134
And then thirdly, we need governments and policy makers, regulators to better understand how the technology works.
135
If you really care about what you're using, you need a dummy copy to let the agent work on
136
and you need to have almost a whole separate thing where it cannot get to it.
137
It is a wild learning experience.
138
Still super bullish on AI.
139
It is an incredibly valuable tool and you will 10x your output.
140
You just have to take security seriously and you have to be prepared.
141
The cyber incidents we've seen with some of these AI agents has definitely put companies with a little bit more caution now.
142
I don't think that's going to stop their interest in the technology,
143
but the C -suite at most organizations could be pretty cautious around some of this technology.
144
They don't want to jump into something they don't really have a grasp on
145
or that has the ability to damage their business, their share prices and their earnings.
ดาวน์โหลดแอป
ทุกอย่างที่ต้องใช้เพื่อพูดได้คล่อง
AI ให้คะแนนการออกเสียงให้คะแนนทุกประโยค
ฝึก IPAเชี่ยวชาญทุกเสียง
คำศัพท์สร้างคลังคำของคุณ
เกมคำศัพท์เล่นไปเรียนไป
ช่องเดียวกัน
B21
Scaramucci: Lutnick and Bessent have "Potomac fever" - and I had it too
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
How AI is helping brands identify consumer trends faster
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Why Abu Dhabi Wants to Export Energy AI
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
Will robots take our jobs? | CNBC Explains
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B24
How South Korea’s AI Boom Is Spilling Into Housing
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
He Quit Banking to Sell Bubble Tea — Now It Makes Over $500 Million A Year
Business EnglishDaily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
Inside The Hidden Bottleneck In The AI Chip Boom
Business EnglishWorking Adults
B22
Lab-grown meat is on the rise — here's how it is made
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B214
What makes art so expensive? | CNBC Explains
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Why The AI Boom Is Reshuffling The Global Stock Market Hierarchy
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
David Beckham on Leadership, Legacy & Life Beyond Football
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
Why is Singapore so rich? | CNBC Explains
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B23
143 Investors Said No. Now WHOOP Is Worth $10 Billion
Business EnglishInterview EnglishUniversity Students
B21
The problem of education inequality | CNBC Reports
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B24
Why Chinese Bubble Tea Chains Are Brewing Billions
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Why Millionaires Are Moving To Italy
Business EnglishWorking Adults
B214
Why does Japan work so hard? | CNBC Explains
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C14
Why France’s Economy Is Stalling
IELTS PrepBusiness EnglishUniversity Students
C128
Why is Switzerland home to so many billionaires?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C1Why food is getting more expensive for everyone
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
FOR YOU
วิดีโอแนะนำ
C11
29 ประโยค
The potential of agentic AI in business | Vietnam Today
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
65 ประโยค
Naomi Klein: The AI Bubble Is Going To Burst. This Is How We Prepare.
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
11 ประโยค
Why Is There So Much AI Slop?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C184 ประโยค
The 4-Hour Workweek in a World of AI
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
195 ประโยค
AI Destroyed My Profession
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
114 ประโยค
Harnessing generative AI in architecture, engineering & construction
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
37 ประโยค
I read Anthropic's 92-page risk factor document, so you don't have to | Explainer
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
124 ประโยค
Agentic AI Frameworks Explained: Workflows, Multi-Agent, & Production
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
510 ประโยค
Inside the secret race to build artificial intelligence | The Gray Area
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C15
260 ประโยค
AI Just Crossed the Terrifying Line - Now What?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
484 ประโยค
How to Build an AI Agent for Every Part of Your Life
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
คำศัพท์และข้อสังเกตด้านการพูดสำหรับบทเรียนนี้
บทเรียนฝึกพูดนี้ใช้วิดีโอ “Why AI Agents Are Becoming a Security Risk for Businesses” เป็นสื่อ คำที่ถูกพูดซ้ำบ่อยที่สุด: agent, software, companies, customer วิดีโอนี้มี 145 ประโยค และ 1964 คำ สำหรับฝึกพูดตาม ช่วงที่มีเสียงพูดยาว 11:25 ผู้พูดพูดด้วยความเร็วเป็นธรรมชาติ ประมาณ 172 คำต่อนาที ใกล้เคียงกับบทสนทนาในชีวิตประจำวัน 82% ของคำอยู่ใน 3,000 คำที่ใช้บ่อยที่สุดในภาษาอังกฤษ ส่วนที่เหลือควรดูไว้ก่อนเริ่มฝึก
คำศัพท์สำคัญในวิดีโอนี้
คำที่ควรเรียนรู้ 15 คำจากวิดีโอ พร้อมคำอ่านและความหมาย:
| คำศัพท์ | คำอ่าน | ความหมาย |
|---|---|---|
| necessarily คำกริยาวิเศษณ์ | /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/ | ต้อง |
| pocket คำนาม | /ˈpɑ.kɪt/ | กระเป๋า |
| infrastructure คำนาม | /ˈɪnfɹəˌstɹʌkt͡ʃə/ | โครงสร้างพื้นฐาน |
| enterprise คำนาม | /ˈɛntəˌpɹaɪz/ | ธุรกิจ |
| landscape คำนาม | /ˈlan(d)skeɪp/ | ทิวทัศน์, ทัศนียภาพ |
| objective คำนาม | /ɒbˈd͡ʒɛk.tɪv/ | เป้าหมาย |
| database คำนาม | /ˈdeɪtəˌbeɪs/ | ฐานข้อมูล |
| delete คำกริยา | /dɪˈliːt/ | ลบ |
| privilege คำนาม | /ˈpɹɪv.(ɪ.)lɪd͡ʒ/ | สิทธิ |
| confused คำคุณศัพท์ | /kənˈfjuːzd/ | สับสน |
| gap คำนาม | /ɡæp/ | ช่อง |
| railway คำนาม | /ˈɹeɪlˌweɪ/ | การรถไฟ, รถไฟ |
| gray คำคุณศัพท์ | /ɡɹeɪ/ | เทา |
| chase คำกริยา | /t͡ʃeɪs/ | กวด |
| output คำนาม | /ˈaʊtpʊt/ | เอาท์พุต |
ไวยากรณ์ในวิดีโอนี้
โครงสร้างที่ผู้พูดใช้บ่อยที่สุด พร้อมคำพูดจริงจากวิดีโอ:
| โครงสร้าง | ในวิดีโอ |
|---|---|
| Present perfect have/has + กริยาช่อง 3 — เหตุการณ์ในอดีตที่ยังเกี่ยวข้องกับปัจจุบัน | has seen · have already been deployed · has spread |
| Passive voice be + กริยาช่อง 3 — เน้นสิ่งที่เกิดขึ้น ไม่ใช่ผู้กระทำ | been deployed · are deployed · is projected |
| Relative clauses who / which + อนุประโยค — ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับคนหรือสิ่งของ | things, which makes · service, which can · problem, which is |
การออกเสียงที่ควรระวัง
ผู้พูดใช้รูปย่อและรูปลดเสียง 29 ครั้ง เช่น don't, I've, we're ให้พูดแบบสั้นตามที่ได้ยิน
- เสียง “th”: authorization /ˌɔːθəɹaɪˈzeɪʃən/, authentication /ɔːˌθɛntɪˈkeɪʃn̩/, thirdly /ˈθɚdli/
- เสียง “sh” และ “zh”: instruction /ɪnˈstɹʌkʃən/, restoration /ɹɛstəˈɹeɪʃən/, unusual /ʌnˈjuːʒ(u)əl/, ratio /ˈɹeɪ.ʃoʊ/, crucial /ˈkɹuː.ʃəl/
- คำยาว — ลงเสียงหนักให้ถูกพยางค์: liability /laɪəˈbɪlɪti/, necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/, infrastructure /ˈɪnfɹəˌstɹʌkt͡ʃə/, operator /ˈɑpəˌɹeɪtɚ/, entity /ˈɛn.tə.ti/ [-tʰi]
เสียงที่คนไทยมักออกเสียงยาก:
- เสียงท้ายคำ — ออกเสียงให้ครบ ไม่เปลี่ยนเป็นตัวสะกดแบบไทย: rental /ˈɹɛntəl/, liable /ˈlaɪ̯əbəl/, behalf /bɪˈhæf/, enterprise /ˈɛntəˌpɹaɪz/, objective /ɒbˈd͡ʒɛk.tɪv/
- /v/ — ไม่ใช่ /w/ ให้ฟันบนแตะริมฝีปากล่าง: provider /pɹəˈvaɪ.də(ɹ)/, objective /ɒbˈd͡ʒɛk.tɪv/, privilege /ˈpɹɪv.(ɪ.)lɪd͡ʒ/, comprehensive /ˌkɑm.pɹəˈhɛn.sɪv/, privacy /ˈpɹaɪ.və.si/
- /z/ — เสียงก้อง ไม่ใช่ /s/: enterprise /ˈɛntəˌpɹaɪz/, confused /kənˈfjuːzd/, authorization /ˌɔːθəɹaɪˈzeɪʃən/, maximize /ˈmæksəmaɪz/, optimize /ˈɑptɪmaɪz/
วิธีฝึกกับวิดีโอนี้
- ฟังวิดีโอให้จบหนึ่งรอบโดยยังไม่ต้องพูด แล้วจดคำที่ยังไม่รู้จัก
- เริ่มที่ความเร็ว 0.75× พูดตามทีละประโยค แล้วกลับไปใช้ความเร็วปกติเมื่อเริ่มคล่อง
- อัดเสียงตัวเองแล้วเทียบกับต้นฉบับ โดยสังเกตคำอย่าง necessarily, pocket, infrastructure เป็นพิเศษ
เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?
Shadowing เป็นเทคนิคการเรียนรู้ภาษาที่ได้รับการรับรองทางวิทยาศาสตร์ พัฒนาขึ้นสำหรับการฝึกนักแปลมืออาชีพ วิธีการนี้เรียบง่ายแต่ทรงพลัง: คุณฟังเสียงภาษาอังกฤษจากเจ้าของภาษาและพูดตามทันที — เหมือนเงาที่ตามผู้พูดด้วยช่วงเวลาห่าง 1-2 วินาที การวิจัยแสดงว่าเทคนิคนี้ปรับปรุงความแม่นยำในการออกเสียง ทำนองเสียง จังหวะ การเชื่อมเสียง การฟังเข้าใจ และความคล่องแคล่วในการพูดได้อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ