跟讀練習: Why The Microplastics Crisis Will Only Get Worse - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。

188 句

如果句子過短或過長，請點選 Edit 進行調整。

Nearly everything we eat and drink is wrapped in plastic.

In fact, global plastic production more than doubled between 2000 and 2022.

And now we're realizing it's showing up in our bodies too.

One recent study showed the level of microplastics in the frontal

cortex of our brains increased by about 50% between 2016 and 2024.

You cannot take the current exposure levels to plastic

and say let's double them in the human race and just see what happens.

I mean, that's just idiotic.

The problem is that plastic never fully decomposes.

It just breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces.

When it becomes smaller than five millimeters, that's about the width of a pencil eraser.

It's called a microplastic.

But then a subset called nanoplastics can get much, much smaller.

So small that they can't even be seen with the human eye.

There has been increasing chronic disease.

We know that some of that is from many of these chemicals that are used in plastics.

Plastic is in some ways an amazing material.

It has this amazing breadth of uses that makes it a very valuable material.

It also happens to be very inexpensive.

It's cheap to make.

And it has long been inexpensive, but it's become even cheaper to make more recently.

And when you combine inexpensive with very useful, you're going to have a lot of demand for this product.

Plastic production is a big industry, $880 billion in fact.

And as big oil faces weakened demand for gasoline, it's increasingly turned to plastic.

Aside from the already massive plastic waste problem that the world is facing, it's now in our bodies.

And with more research emerging that shows its harm on our health, why is plastic production increasing?

And who's reaping the benefits from it?

In that study about plastic in our brains, researchers at the University of New Mexico studied samples from cadavers.

Based on those samples, they calculated

that the total mass of plastic from the 2024 brains they evaluated would equate to about 7 grams, about the size of a plastic spoon.

Tracy Woodruff wasn't involved in the brain study, but is a microplastics researcher.

She's evaluated thousands of studies on this topic.

We're able to conclude based on those studies that microplastics are suspected to adversely impact reproductive health,

respiratory health, and effects on the digestive system.

And that the links to these mechanisms that we saw could also could increase the risk of colon cancer and lung cancer.

Almost every single thing we buy from the grocery store comes wrapped in plastic, which sheds microscopic particles onto our food.

It's also contaminated our food chains.

Researchers found

that 99% of the fish they studied off the coast of Oregon were found to contain microplastics in their muscle tissue.

It's been found to be released in our mouths from simply chewing a piece of gum.

Researchers have even found them in fruits and vegetables.

As humans we are becoming part plastic.

That is the reality, right?

And plastic has over 16,000 chemicals.

We have only, you know, had studies and research that has about a quarter of them documented as harmful,

but we just haven't had the time and resources to explore how these other chemicals may be impacting us.

While there is definitive research to prove microplastics are inside of us, the exact effects on our bodies is difficult to pinpoint.

Many studies have found a correlation between microplastics and chronic disease, but cannot establish a causation.

For example, the study on our brains analyzed samples of people with dementia

and found much higher levels of microplastic in them compared to the brains without the disease.

There are of course many other lifestyle or genetic factors that could have caused dementia.

On its website, the FDA reiterates the lack of causality by saying, Current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that the level of microplastics

or nanoplastics detected in our foods pose a risk to human health.

Consider microplastics to be sort of a toxic delivery mechanism.

All the chemicals that are attached to the plastic that make up the plastic, that soften the plastic or that block UV light

or do all the things that give it its characteristics that make it so versatile, a lot of those are pretty toxic substances.

Petrochemicals, the building blocks of plastic, are produced from oil and gas.

It's a small but profitable area of the fossil fuel industry.

In the US, only about 1.5% of natural gas is converted into chemicals

that are used to make plastic and other consumer products.

But as oil demand declines from EV adoption, US tariffs, and a slowing of economic growth in India and China, industry giants are investing heavily into chemical production.

Renewables are coming in very inexpensively, and so renewables are actually on the margin in cutting

or reducing the amount of additional natural gas that would have been built otherwise.

Plastic production is projected to grow more than 40% between 2025 and 2040.

In its 2024 outlook, British Petroleum, or BP, said, materials.

Exxon Mobil and Shell made over $110 billion in combined revenue from their chemical businesses in 2024.

Plastics is the growth area.

They know how to do it.

They already have access to the gas that you need to make plastics.

They're not constrained at all by what happens to people.

They don't care about that.

They just see this as, OK, what do my shareholders need?

How am I going to make a ton of money?

We have recycled 80 million pounds of plastic that otherwise would have gone to landfills.

And we have plans to ramp that recycling up to a billion pounds by 2027.

In 2020, Saudi Aramco, the biggest oil company in the world, bought a 70% stake in petrochemical company, Sabic.

While fourth quarter 2024 results were lower than expected, Sabic made nearly $35 billion from petrochemicals last year.

Sabic and Exxon are two of the largest players in the polyethylene plastics industry.

I think that the oil and gas majors all see a major opportunity.

They've been investing very heavily, billions of dollars, into building plastic producing facilities.

So when they're losing some of their profit center or expect to be losing some of their core profit centers, this is a place where they might be able to make up some of that lost profit.

Fracking has made the U.S into the world's biggest oil producer pumping out nearly 13.5 million barrels per day.

And a global surplus of oil, and particularly natural gas, means more plastic production.

The bottom line is that it's really coming from the fact that we have so much natural gas and plenty of ethane, and it's pretty easy to get that ethane,

so that the actual feedstock, if you will, so that what's used to create plastics is really cheap in the United States.

With widespread investments in plastics growth, the market is becoming highly oversaturated.

The margins on chemicals are compressing and plastic supply is projected to increasingly outpace demand.

Shell, for example, felt that firsthand in its most recent quarter.

This isn't about we need more plastic.

This is about them pushing more plastic on us because they're looking for new markets for their products.

And I think one of the concerns that people have is that once they put in all this infrastructure, because it's expensive, right?

You have to build a facility and all the mechanisms for transporting it from the ground to the product.

It's gonna be really hard to roll that back.

Plastic was first created in the early 1900s.

As well as the development of new man-made plastics and fabrics.

But wide-scale production didn't ramp up until the 50s.

The public was sold on the notion of disposability, but over the following decades, began waking up to the pollution crisis it was creating.

There were all sorts of efforts in the 1970s and 80s

and even in the 90s to ban plastic bags or to ban plastics in general.

100

And that is really what was at the root of the industry's pivot to recycling.

101

Because they saw recycling as a way to deflect and defend against those efforts to ban their products.

102

A report by the Center for Climate Integrity alleges that the plastics industry spent years making quote,

103

performative investments and would roll back research initiatives or quietly shut down facilities when regulatory threats simmered.

104

Just last year, the Attorney General of California sued ExxonMobil over a decades-long campaign of recycling deception.

105

If the public was convinced that their single-use throwaway consumer lifestyle was supported by recycling and that it was environmentally friendly,

106

they would buy more and more and it would drive the profits of ExxonMobil up and up.

107

And so that's the idea, but it's based on a lie.

108

It's illegal.

109

We've sued them in court and we're here to hold them accountable.

110

Within two months of the lawsuit, Exxon announced a commitment to invest $200 million in boosting recycling capacity in its Texas plant.

111

In January 2025, ExxonMobil countersued the California AG and other environmental groups for defaming and disparaging the company's recycling initiatives.

112

We've seen this growing trend where activists and ideologues, particularly in the climate space, and then some politicians, particularly state attorney generals,

113

are hijacking and abusing legitimate processes to advance their own selfish agendas.

114

I think that was certainly true with the state attorney general, Rob Bonta.

115

He was lying, lying about our company, lying about our technology, impugning the character of our people,

116

interfering with our business, and probably most importantly, getting in the way of improving the environment.

117

I don't think anybody really was quite aware of the depth of the fraud that the industry was perpetrating on the public.

118

I mean, they knew from the beginning that the economics of plastic recycling would never work.

119

Only about 9% of plastic waste worldwide was recycled in 2019.

120

In the U.S., that number is even lower at 5%.

121

So, why aren't more plastics being recycled?

122

It's a complicated chain.

123

There is a problem with collecting and sorting and processing the plastics.

124

There is a, the current recycling technology has its limits.

125

The plastic today is not a simple single element of plastic.

126

They are very complicated structures to achieve the properties that we're looking for in the use of plastic.

127

And so, many of those properties make them inconsistent for mechanical recycling.

128

It is simply cheaper to make new plastic than to recycle, especially considering the abundance of gas and oil.

129

There are no incentives for a company to switch out of plastics.

130

There are no incentives for a company to use recycled plastics.

131

It's more expensive.

132

The only incentive they have is that many companies want to be socially responsible.

133

Political backing has also been instrumental in making all of this possible. While U.S.

134

Secretary of Health and Human Services, RFK Jr., has said reassessing the levels of chemicals and plastic in our food is a priority,

135

the Trump administration as a whole has taken a pro-plastic stance by aggressively deregulating the energy industry.

136

It's cutting incentives for renewables and opening federal lands for more oil and gas drilling.

137

This push for more drilling comes despite the fact that the U.S is already producing a surplus.

138

Current deregulatory efforts by the current federal government in the United

139

States giving less to worry about for the business executives in the oil and gas industry relating to plastics.

140

And so I don't anticipate there's going to be any regulation on plastics in the next few years.

141

Between 2014 and 2024, the oil and gas industry spent over $1.4 billion on federal lobbying.

142

Having worked in the government, there are stakeholders, and those are really fossil fuel

143

and the chemical producing companies

144

that have a financial stake in what the government says about whatever these topics are related to these toxic chemicals.

145

CNBC reached out to Shell, Exxon and SABIC.

146

However, none of them agreed to an interview.

147

Exxon referred us to a previous interview with CNBC.

148

Shell told us

149

that it believes the global plastic treaty provides a unique opportunity

150

to mobilize global action to tackle plastic pollution by creating an effective

151

and sustainable plastic circular economy while supporting an inclusive of transition for all stakeholders.

152

While it is impossible to avoid entirely, the good news is there are a few realistic ways to reduce your exposure to microplastics.

153

Cutting out plastic water bottles is one major step everyone can take.

154

There are hundreds of thousands of microplastics floating around in every liter of bottled water.

155

We know that from empirically based studies

156

that you can reduce your exposures to these chemicals that are found in plastic that we know are toxic.

157

So by extrapolation, you can also reduce your exposures to microplastics.

158

And so some of them are and some of them are really super easy, like don't microwave plastic.

159

That's a really easy one.

160

A 2023 study found

161

that microwaving plastic caused the highest release of microplastics into food

162

compared to other usages like storing it in the refrigerator or at room temperature.

163

No one's talking about getting rid of heart valves or, you know, no one's talking about getting rid of essential uses of plastic plastic like plastics in your car dashboard

164

or whatever it is.

165

What we're talking about is plastics that are single use, plastics that are completely unnecessary,

166

plastics where, you know, you don't have to individually wrap like every leaf of lettuce, which it seems to be where we're headed with this stuff.

167

We're unquestionably as a society better off having plastics than no plastics, but we're facing the consequences of having those plastics.

168

And what can we do to try to mitigate those consequences?

169

The American Chemistry Council, a major trade association for plastics, says that plastic packaging can make food last longer.

170

There is also evidence that the carbon emissions saved from reducing food waste outweighs the emissions from producing the plastic packaging.

171

But none of this accounts for the impact on human health.

172

The ACC's VP of Regulatory and Scientific Affairs shared the following comment with CNBC.

173

We can now detect incredibly tiny amounts of substances like microplastics, but finding something at extremely low levels does not mean it's harmful.

174

The science on microplastics is evolving.

175

ACC and our global counterparts are funding research to advance the science so that decisions are guided by sound,

176

data-driven evidence that weighs any potential risks against the essential role plastics play in our daily lives.

177

These types of synthetic plastic and the plastic

178

that we are talking about really has only been readily used in society for the past 70 years.

179

So it's the amount of evidence and understanding of how plastic accumulates within our bodies over time is really in its infancy.

180

This chart shows the level of published research surrounding microplastics in the National Library of Medicine over the past decade.

181

Both scientists and the general public are just beginning to understand the implications of microplastics, given that most of the studies on them have recently emerged.

182

We're just doing some studies now looking at exposures to

183

pregnant women who were previously pregnant and they're still exposed to DDT like that was banned in 1970.

184

And that's because once we pollute the environment, it just hangs around and we are just continuously exposed.

185

One of the things that is really lacking in terms of government policy

186

and regulation is dealing with these pollutants that are persistent and bioaccumulative because if make a mistake with them, your mistake is forever.

187

You know, one of the most important things you can do is vote

188

and show up to local community events and really advocating, you know, for stronger laws and regulations on plastic.

下載應用

流利口語所需的一切

AI 發音評分逐句打分

音標練習掌握每個音

詞彙學習建立你的詞庫

詞彙遊戲邊玩邊學

掃碼

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同頻道

FOR YOU

本課的詞彙與口語要點

這節 B2 級別的口語課以影片“Why The Microplastics Crisis Will Only Get Worse”為素材。影片中反覆出現的詞有：plastic, microplastic, chemical, gas, oil。這段影片共有 188 個句子、2620 個單詞可供跟讀。講話部分時長為 16:17。說話人語速自然，每分鐘約 161 個詞，接近日常對話。只有 81% 的單詞屬於英語最常用的 3,000 詞，詞彙難度較高。

影片中的重點詞彙

影片中最難的 15 個單詞，附發音和釋義：

單詞	發音	釋義
microplastic 名詞		微塑膠
recycle 動詞	/ɹəˈsaɪkəl/	迴圈再造 /迴圈再造, 回收
researcher 名詞	/ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/	研究員 /研究員, 研究者
incentive 名詞	/ɪnˈsɛntɪv/	刺激, 誘因 /誘因
inexpensive 形容詞	/ˌɪnɪkˈspɛnsɪv/	低廉, 便宜
renewable 形容詞	/ɹɪˈnu.ə.bl̩/	可再生
wrap 動詞	/ɹæp/	包裝 /包裝, 包
ethane 名詞	/ˈɛθeɪn/	乙烷
stakeholder 名詞	/ˈsteɪkˌhəʊl.də/	賭注經紀人 /賭注經紀人
emission 名詞	/ɪˈmɪʃ.ən/	排放
dementia 名詞	/dɪˈmɛnʃə/	痴呆 /痴呆, 失智症
surplus 名詞	/ˈsɝˌplʌs/	過剩 /過剩, 多餘 /多餘
emerge 動詞	/ɪˈmɝd͡ʒ/	出現 /出現
harmful 形容詞	/ˈhɑɹmfl̩/	有害, 不良
fossil 名詞	/ˈfɑsl̩/	化石

影片中出現的短語動詞

單詞	發音	釋義
make up 動詞	/ˌmeɪk ˈʌp/	組成 /組成
hang around 動詞		逗留

值得反覆跟讀的句子

影片中簡短而完整的句子，可以直接用在日常對話裡：

I mean, that's just idiotic.
It's also contaminated our food chains.
How am I going to make a ton of money?
This isn't about we need more plastic.

影片中的語法

說話人最常用的結構，並附上影片中的原話：

結構	影片中的用法
現在完成進行時 have/has been + -ing — 以前開始、現在仍在繼續的動作	has been increasing · They've been investing
現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事	It's been found · have even found · haven't had
被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼，而不是誰做的	is wrapped · be seen · wasn't involved

需要注意的發音

說話人用了 29 次縮略和弱讀形式，例如 we're, don't, they're。請按聽到的簡短形式來說。

“th” 音: ethane /ˈɛθeɪn/, synthetic /sɪnˈθɛtɪk/, width /ˈwɪtθ/
“sh” 和 “zh” 音: emission /ɪˈmɪʃ.ən/, dementia /dɪˈmɛnʃə/, pollution /pəˈluʃən/, implication /ˌɪmpləˈkeɪʃən/, shareholder /ˈʃɛəˌhəʊl.də(ɹ)/
長單詞——注意重音位置: inexpensive /ˌɪnɪkˈspɛnsɪv/, contaminate /kənˈtæmɪneɪt/, implication /ˌɪmpləˈkeɪʃən/, refrigerator /ɹɪˈfɹɪd͡ʒ.əˌɹeɪ.tɚ/, anticipate /ænˈtɪs.ɪ.peɪt/

中文母語者容易讀錯的音：

/v/ — 不要讀成 /w/，上齒輕觸下唇: incentive /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/, inexpensive /ˌɪnɪkˈspɛnsɪv/, evaluate /ɪˈvaljʊeɪt/, versatile /ˈvɜː.səˌtaɪl/, reproductive /ˌɹiːpɹəˈdʌktɪv/
詞尾子音 — 要讀清楚，後面不要加母音: incentive /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/, inexpensive /ˌɪnɪkˈspɛnsɪv/, wrap /ɹæp/, surplus /ˈsɝˌplʌs/, emerge /ɪˈmɝd͡ʒ/
/r/ 和 /l/ 的區別: recycle /ɹəˈsaɪkəl/, renewable /ɹɪˈnu.ə.bl̩/, harmful /ˈhɑɹmfl̩/, drill /dɹɪl/, shareholder /ˈʃɛəˌhəʊl.də(ɹ)/

如何用這段影片練習

先完整聽一遍影片，不要開口，記下不認識的單詞。
先用 0.75 倍速逐句跟讀，熟練之後再回到正常速度。
錄下自己的聲音並與原聲對比，特別注意 microplastic, recycle, researcher 這類單詞。

什麼是跟讀法？

跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧，最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓，並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大：您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同，跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性，語調，節奏，連讀，聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟讀法: 閱讀完整分步指南 →

跟讀練習: Why The Microplastics Crisis Will Only Get Worse - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

下載應用

Why Retailers Are Shrinking Their Assortments

The Rise Of Open-Source Software

Watch AI Dock A Boat

The Race To Power AI Is Reshaping America's Electric Grid

Why Investors Are Living Through President Trump's Stock Market

Why 7-Eleven Failed In Indonesia

How AI Is Killing The Value Of A College Degree

Why Corporate America Is Spending More On Security

How Cheap Mortgages Are Backfiring On Homeowners

Inside Bracket22, A Trading Firm Powered By Al Agents

Why The Airline Business Is Broken

Why Hyundai’s Investing $26B In The U.S.

Why Even High Earners Are Living Paycheck To Paycheck

How Walmart Is Beating Everyone In Groceries

Inside The Real Estate Rush Behind AI

How Working For Google, Amazon, And Microsoft Lost 'Dream Job' Status

How Walmart Is Hoping Its New Tech Will Help Shoppers And Employees

How Chinese EVs Won Brazil — And Left U.S. Automakers Behind

Why Airline Ticket Prices Are Unlikely To Go Down

Where Did Americans’ Savings Go?

Brian Cox School Experiments: plastics – industry video

Did the AI bubble just pop?

Experts Warn Of Hearing Loss Due To Unsafe Listening Practices

What Actually Works for Your Skin? A Stanford-Trained Plastic Surgeon Explains

Why The U.S. Is Struggling To Keep Food Safe

The 'Luxury Poverty' Trap, Explained

What happens to old electronic devices when you upgrade?

Your Brain Isn't Rotting. Here's What Doomscrolling Actually Does

Why Plastic Straws Suck

US Running Out of Emergency Oil - The SPR Hits 40-Year Low

Why Scientists Are Warning Us About Everyday Plastics | 60 Minutes Australia

Lab-grown meat is on the rise — here's how it is made