跟读练习: The Surprising Reason Your Past Still Controls You - 通过视频学习英语口语
选择练习模式
每种模式都会打开全屏练习室。
125 句
如果句子过短或过长,请点击 Edit 进行调整。
1
I really want to blow your mind right now
2
because it turns out that the science of human memory is an unbelievable area of research.
3
It's so great.
4
How do we actually construct memories in the past when I'm thinking about Lincoln City?
5
Or for that matter, when I'm thinking about something really negative, when I'm thinking about something that actually happened.
6
The way that I do that, and this is where the neuroscience gets really tricky, it's that it's not about retrieving that memory.
7
You might think to yourself that like there's a little film, a little snippet of video someplace in your brain,
8
and you go get that out of the archive
9
and throw it into the projector and watch it again and again and again.
10
But it turns out that's not right.
11
What it's really about when you're dredging up memories, good or bad, is reconstruction, not retrieval.
12
Every time you conjure up the past, there's a part of the parietal lobe in your brain.
13
It's called the angular gyrus.
14
And what it does is it it it reconstructs every episodic memory, which is a whole bunch of different things.
15
There's a whole bunch of different elements to it, and they're stored in physically different locations.
16
And so what your brain has to do every time you come up with a scene, like you tell a story
17
or you remember a particular day that's in a whole bunch of different locations
18
and you put it together new every single time time.
19
That's a biological marvel, but it's prone to error.
20
As you can imagine, if you have to reassemble it, reassemble it, reconstruct it, reconstruct it every single time,
21
there's an opportunity as time goes by for glitches to get into that algorithm.
22
And that's one of the reasons that tons of research shows that the further away a very distinct memory is from you,
23
the more likely you are to screw it up as you recount it, to get it actually wrong.
24
And for you to believe absolutely photographically in something that absolutely did not happen.
25
Now, here's how the studies actually kind of work.
26
This is a 1992 study.
27
This is an article called Phantom Flash Bulbs, False Recollections of Hearing the News about Challenger.
28
That's the Challenger space shuttle.
29
They exploded in 1986.
30
You probably heard about it.
31
I remember this as a young adult when one of the space shuttles
32
that went up into space and blew up before it got into orbit is really,
33
really traumatic because half the country was watching it and it exploded.
34
It was horrible.
35
What researchers were doing, what they wanted to know was how did people actually remember it compared to what they had said had happened.
36
And so right after the Challenger explosion, these researchers, they asked people to recount their experience right afterward when it was most faithfully recounted,
37
a bunch of students who did that.
38
And then 30 months later, All right.
39
Okay.
40
So two and a half years later, they went through and recounted the experience again.
41
So they followed the same people for two and a half years.
42
That's one of the reasons they didn't publish the article for almost four years after the challenger exploded.
43
And in 93 % of the cases, the counts were completely inconsistent with each other.
44
And in every one of the cases, they said, no, that's the way it happened.
45
And it wasn't the way that it happened.
46
And they had evidence, videotaped evidence that the same people were telling different stories.
47
Now, this is really interesting, right?
48
That's one of the reasons that I can tell you what happened on 9 -11.
49
And it's probably the case that if I went back and saw my own recounting of it,
50
had there been a videotape of me telling the story that what I'm telling today, I'm not trying to lie.
51
I think it's accurate.
52
But what was going on is the angular gyrus is reassembling the memories and getting glitches and getting, you know,
53
leaving out little pieces of video and information is being added
54
or information is being lost because of what I'm actually living through today.
55
I'm inadvertently editing that.
56
Now, one thing to keep in mind, you will see in popular culture a lot and in modern media
57
and in journalism a lot where people will be telling about the crimes
58
and terrible things that happened to them a long time in the past.
59
And even in the court of law, and our legal system will ask people to testify in congressional testimony or in legal testimony.
60
People will be asked to testify to things that happened to them a long time ago, by memory, sometimes decades ago.
61
When we see this, those of us in the behavioral science community, we always just slap our foreheads because we're like,
62
you know, journalists are so credulous about these testimonies.
63
Or when people write in books, exactly a conversation they had when they were children or something is
64
that we're photographic or
65
when in the therapy industrial complex in this country professionals counselors
66
social workers psychologists people in my line of work will ask young people to recount to dredge up old memories
67
so they can actually find some evidence of trauma in their past those of us who who have studied memory
68
we say that's not that's not credible and it's not because people lie it's because that's not my friends how memories work.
69
Now, that's interesting enough, but that's actually really useful when you think about it, because reconstructing memories based on current experience gives us an opportunity,
70
but we're not quite there yet.
71
The reason our memories change is because the reconstruction of the stories of our past,
72
it's we do that in accordance with current narratives and current events and current needs.
73
In other words, you contaminate your memories based on what you're thinking about right now.
74
That's one of the things that we think about.
75
And I'll give you an example of this.
76
Let's say that you have an old friend, somebody you hung out with in college and somebody you really,
77
really, really liked, but it was a different time in your life.
78
And, and, and let's say that your consciousness has been raised and you're a little bit ashamed about how you,
79
how you behaved when you're in college.
80
And if there's nothing you're ashamed of that happened when you're in college, well, you've just edited your memories.
81
Your angular gyrus is, is, is going to town here.
82
And so what typically will happen when people have great memories,
83
but troubled memories, because you're not happy about the way that you behaved,
84
you're sort of, you have regret or you have a sense of shame about great old times.
85
What that will do is that will torque the way that you think about the people that were in those memories.
86
You'll start to think more negatively about the people that you wouldn't have had a negative thought about at all.
87
Another example of this is that, you know, college students will come home from college weirdly convinced
88
that they suffered all sorts of trauma because their parents are so horrible in their political views.
89
This is one of the things that we find.
90
Now, this is actually a form of predation by people who are counseling young people sometimes to say, oh, really?
91
Tell me about your dad.
92
Tell me about your mom.
93
Tell me about their political views.
94
And when they hear they'll say, boy, who hurt you?
95
Who hurt you?
96
And all that's doing is inducing people to negatively valence memories that would not have had a negative valence otherwise,
97
as the angular gyrus is reconstructing episodic memory in their post -adolescent brains.
98
And it has nothing to do with post -adolescence.
99
It has to do with brains more than anything else, which is one of the reasons that people will come back and say,
100
I didn't realize how screwed up my family life was until I went to college.
101
And the reason is
102
because somebody who does not have your interests at heart was editing your memories by inducing
103
you to think about a different way to dredge up these pictures
104
and to valence them with a current way of thinking that they're trying to give to you.
105
That's not great, but it's not even great when we do it to ourselves.
106
Now, the shifting memories in a way, they're not entirely inaccurate because they're assembled from a pretty partial set of details.
107
And the exact set that we remember changes every time as we dust the memory off.
108
And by the way, your new politics might be right.
109
The new way that you live and your new morals, they might be right.
110
But it can ruin perfectly good experiences and turn them into bitterness along the way.
111
It's interesting in the studies on this that we see, I'll put one in that.
112
There's a really nice paper in Social Cognition called Emotion and Memory research, a grumpy overview that shows that when people are afraid,
113
when you induce them to be fearful in laboratory settings, you show them scary movies,
114
for example, and then you ask them to remember scenes from their own youth, they'll think about the threats from those times.
115
They'll think of scary parts of those particular memories.
116
But the same is true also when you make people really, really, really happy.
117
And when people are full of love and they're laughing a lot, and you induce them to think about kind of negative things in their past,
118
they'll find them really funny at the end of the day.
119
And you know, you've had this experience.
120
I promise you, you've had this experience.
121
You could think about this a little bit, where you think about something awful that happened and you're with your friends
122
and you're having a good time and you're telling the story.
123
And it's like for the very first time you recount the story and you're cracking up while you're telling the story,
124
that's because you provided a positive valence to what had been a negative memory.
125
You're filling in the gaps as you reconstruct it with positivity.
同频道
FOR YOU
推荐视频
本课的词汇与口语要点
这节口语课以视频“The Surprising Reason Your Past Still Controls You”为素材。 视频中反复出现的词有:memories, memory, happened。 这段视频共有 125 个句子、1714 个单词可供跟读。 讲话部分时长为 8:55。 说话人语速较快,每分钟约 192 个词,会出现较多连读和弱读。 87% 的单词属于英语最常用的 3,000 词,词汇容易理解。
视频中的重点词汇
视频中 15 个值得学习的单词,附发音和释义:
| 单词 | 发音 | 释义 |
|---|---|---|
| challenger 名词 | /ˈt͡ʃælənd͡ʒəɹ/ | 挑戰者 /挑战者 |
| edit 动词 | /ˈɛdɪt/ | 編輯 /编辑 |
| testimony 名词 | /ˈtɛstɪmoʊni/ | 證言 /证言, 證詞 /证词 |
| explode 动词 | /ɪkˈsploʊd/ | 爆炸, 爆發 /爆发 |
| horrible 形容词 | /ˈhɔɹ.ɪ.bəl/ | 可怕的, 可畏 |
| scary 形容词 | /ˈskɛə.ɹi/ | 恐怖 |
| trauma 名词 | /ˈtɹɔm.ə/ | 負傷 /负伤, 損傷 /损伤 |
| ashamed 形容词 | /əˈʃeɪmd/ | 慚愧 /惭愧, 羞愧 |
| behave 动词 | /bɪˈheɪv/ | 為人 /为人 |
| reconstruction 名词 | /ˌɹiːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/ | 重建 |
| researcher 名词 | /ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/ | 研究員 /研究员, 研究者 |
| shuttle 名词 | /ˈʃʌtəl/ | 梭子 |
| testify 动词 | /ˈtɛstɪfaɪ/ | 作證 /作证 |
| gap 名词 | /ɡæp/ | 間隙 /间隙 |
| awful 形容词 | /ˈɔːfʊl/ | 壞 /坏, 糟糕 |
视频中出现的短语动词
| 单词 | 释义 |
|---|---|
| turn out 动词 | 原來 /原来 |
| blow up 动词 | 炸掉, 爆破 |
| come back 动词 | 回來 /回来, 返回 |
| come up with 动词 | 想出, 提出 |
| go back 动词 | 回去, 返回 |
| go through 动词 | 通過 /通过 |
视频中的语法
说话人最常用的结构,并附上视频中的原话:
| 结构 | 视频中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 现在完成时 have/has + 过去分词 — 过去发生但与现在仍有关联的事 | have studied · has been raised · you've just edited |
| 定语从句 who / which + 从句 — 补充说明人或事物 | memory, which is · students who did · people who are |
| 被动语态 be + 过去分词 — 强调发生了什么,而不是谁做的 | being added · being lost · will be asked |
需要注意的发音
说话人用了 43 次缩略和弱读形式,例如 you're, I'm, they're。请按听到的简短形式来说。
- “th” 音: algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, faithfully /ˈfeɪθfəli/
- “sh” 和 “zh” 音: ashamed /əˈʃeɪmd/, reconstruction /ˌɹiːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, shuttle /ˈʃʌtəl/, explosion /ɛkˈsploʊ.ʒən/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/
- 长单词——注意重音位置: testimony /ˈtɛstɪmoʊni/, reconstruction /ˌɹiːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, biological /ˌbaɪ.əˈlɑ.d͡ʒɪ.kəl/, laboratory /ˈlæb(ə)ɹəˌtɔɹi/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/
中文母语者容易读错的音:
- /v/ — 不要读成 /w/,上齿轻触下唇: behave /bɪˈheɪv/, narrative /ˈnæɹ.ə.tɪv/, convince /kənˈvɪns/, marvel /ˈmɑɹvəl/, overview /ˈoʊ.vɚˌvjuː/
- 词尾辅音 — 要读清楚,后面不要加元音: induce /ɪnˈduːs/, edit /ˈɛdɪt/, explode /ɪkˈsploʊd/, ashamed /əˈʃeɪmd/, behave /bɪˈheɪv/
- /r/ 和 /l/ 的区别: challenger /ˈt͡ʃælənd͡ʒəɹ/, horrible /ˈhɔɹ.ɪ.bəl/, moral /ˈmoɹəl/, laboratory /ˈlæb(ə)ɹəˌtɔɹi/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/
如何用这段视频练习
- 先完整听一遍视频,不要开口,记下不认识的单词。
- 先用 0.75 倍速逐句跟读,熟练之后再回到正常速度。
- 录下自己的声音并与原声对比,特别注意 challenger, edit, testimony 这类单词。
什么是跟读法?
跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧,最初开发用于专业口译员的培训,并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大:您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同,跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性,语调,节奏,连读,听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。















