शैडोइंग अभ्यास: 馬斯克：不只基本收入，是「全民高收入」｜辦公室工作會「像閃電一樣」被 AI 取代，那剩下什麼工作？｜Joe Rogan 節目馬斯克｜真實訪談精選、單字解釋、雙語字幕 - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।

158 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

The only way to get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent America from going bankrupt is AI and robotics,

which is like just someone at a computer doing something.

AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning.

And ultimately, working will be optional because you'll have robots plus AI and we'll have,

in a benign scenario, universal high income.

One of the things you said when you stepped away is that you're kind of done and that it's unfixable that

Well or under its current form the way people are approaching it

You can you can make it directionally better, but ultimately you can't fully fix the system

So I I – like it is – it would be accurate to say

that even – like unless you go like super draconian like,

you know, Genghis Khan level on cutting waste and fraud, which you can't really do in a democratic country,

an aspirationally democratic country, then there's no way to solve the debt crisis.

So we've got national debt, that's just insane, where the debt payments, the interest payments on the debt exceed our entire military budget.

I mean, that was one of the wake -up calls for me.

I was like, wait a second, the interest on our national debt is bigger than the entire military budget and growing?

This is crazy um so um so so even

if you implement all these savings you're only delaying the day of reckoning for

when america becomes it goes bankrupt so unless you go full genghis khan um

which you can't really do so um so i came to the conclusion

that the only way that the only way to get us out of the debt crisis

and to prevent America from going bankrupt is AI and robotics.

So we need to grow the economy at a rate that allows us to pay off our debt.

The savings, like reducing waste and forward, can give us a longer runway, but it cannot ultimately pay off our national debt.

So what do you think the solution is to the jobs that are going to be lost because of AI and robotics,

the jobs due to automation, the jobs due to no longer do we need human beings to do these jobs because AI is doing them?

Do you think it's going to be some sort of a universal basic income thing?

Do you think there's going to be some other kind of solution that has to be implemented?

Because a lot of people are going to be out of work, right?

I think there will be actually a high demand for jobs, but not necessarily the same jobs.

So, I mean, this is actually, this process has been happening throughout modern history.

I mean, they used to be, like, doing calculations manually with, like, pencil and paper used to be a job

so used to have like buildings full of people called computers whether the banks would like the all

you do all day is is you do calculations

because they didn't have computers then didn't have digital didn't have digital computers

that people do this yeah well they're just people just like add

and subtract stuff on piece paper and and and that

that would be how banks would do you know financial processing

and you'd have to literally go over their equations to make sure the books are balanced yeah

and most times it's a simple math like

Like in a world before computers, how did you calculate, how did you do transactions?

You had to do them by hand.

So then when computers were introduced, the job of doing bank calculations no longer existed.

So people had to go do something else.

And that's what's going to happen.

That's what is happening at an accelerated rate.

Your AI and then robotics that's the issue though, right the accelerated rate because it's gonna be the accelerator

It's just happening.

Like I said, like AI is the supersonic tsunami so

That's why I call it supersonic tsunami

So it's like what other jobs will be available that aren't available now because of AI Well AI is really still digital.

Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who

Build things with their hands or do things with their hands, like literally welding, electrical work,

plumbing, anything that's physically moving atoms, like cooking food or farming,

like anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time.

But anything that is digital, which is like just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning.

Coding, anything along those lines.

It's going to take over those jobs like lightning.

Just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations, but much faster.

So what happens to all those people?

What kind of numbers are we talking about?

You're going to lose most drivers, right?

Commercial drivers, you're going to have automated vehicles, AI -controlled systems, just like there's certain ports in China,

I think in Singapore, where everything's completely automated.

But yeah, cars are going to be autonomous.

But there's just so many desk jobs where really what people are doing is they're processing email or they're answering the phone.

And just anything that isn't moving atoms, like anything that is not doing physical work, that will obviously be the first thing.

Those jobs will be and are being eliminated by AI at a very rapid pace um um

and ultimately i working will be optional uh because you'll have robots plus ai

and we'll have in a benign scenario universal high income not

just universal basic income universal high income meaning anyone can have any products or services that they want

So you but but there will be a lot of trauma and disruption along the way

So you anticipate a basic income

From that that the economy will boost to such an extent that a high income would be available to almost everybody

So we'd essentially eliminate poverty In the benign scenario.

Yes.

So like There's multiple scenarios.

There are multiple scenarios.

There's a lot of ways this movie can end

like the reason I'm so concerned about AI safety is

that like one of the possibilities is the Terminator scenario

it's not it's not zero percent by in the same way

having Grok be a maximally truth -seeking curious AI will force

the other AI companies to be also be more truth -seeking

and fair and the funniest thing is even though like the socialists

and the Marxists are in opposition to a lot of your ideas, but if this gets implemented and you really can achieve universal high income,

that's the greatest socialist solution of all time.

Like literally no one will have to work.

Correct.

Um, but like I said, so, so there is a benign scenario here, which I think probably people will be happy with if,

if, as long as we achieve it, which is sustainable abundance.

Um, which is if everyone can have – like if you ask people like, what's the future that you want?

And I think a future where we haven't destroyed nature, like you can still – we have the national parks,

we have the Amazon rainforest, it's still there.

We haven't paved the rainforest.

Like the natural beauty is still there.

But people have – nonetheless, everyone has abundance.

Everyone has excellent medical care.

Everyone has whatever goods and services they want.

It kind of sounds like heaven.

100

It sounds like heaven.

101

It is like the ideal socialist utopia and

102

This idea

103

that the only thing you should be doing with your time is working in order to pay your bills and feed yourself

104

Sounds kind of archaic

105

Considering the kind of technology that's at play.

106

Yeah, like a world where that's not your concern at all anymore

107

Everybody has money for food.

108

Everybody has abundance.

109

Everybody has electronics in their home.

110

Everybody essentially has a high income.

111

Now you can kind of do whatever you want.

112

And your day can now be exploring your interests, doing things that you actually enjoy doing.

113

Your purpose just has to shift.

114

Instead of, you know, I'm a hard worker and this is what I do and that's how I define myself.

115

Now you can.

116

Golf all day, you know, you could whatever it is that you enjoy doing can now be your main pursuit.

117

Yeah.

118

Well, that sounds crazy good

119

Yeah, that's that's that's that's that's that's the benign scenario that we should be ending to the movie is actually pretty good

120

Yes Like I think there's there is still this question of meaning of like making sure people don't

121

Lose meaning, you know, like so hopefully it can find meaning in ways

122

that are not that's not derived from their work

123

and Purpose the purpose for things that you you know find things that you do that you enjoy

124

But there's a lot of people that are independently wealthy

125

that spend most of their time doing something they enjoy right and That could be the majority of people

126

Pretty much everyone we would have to rewire how people approach life

127

Which seems to be like acceptable because you're not asking them to be enslaved

128

You're exactly asking them the opposite like no longer be burdened by financial worries

129

Now go do what you like

130

yes test pizza do whatever you want um pretty much um

131

so that's uh that's that's the that's the that's probably the best case outcome

132

that sounds like the best case outcome period for the future

133

if you're looking at like how much people have struggled just to feed themselves all throughout history food shelter safety

134

if all that stuff can be fit like how much would you solve a lot of the crime

135

if there was a universal high income just think of

136

that like how much of crime is financially motivated you know the greater percentage of people

137

that are committing crimes live in poor disenfranchised neighborhoods so

138

if there's no such thing anymore

139

if you really can achieve universal high income yeah

140

this is it sounds like a utopian yes I think some people may commit crime

141

because they like committing crime just some some amount of

142

that is they just a lot of people out there yeah yeah

143

and obviously they've become 40 years old living a life like

144

that now all of a sudden universal high income is not gonna completely stop their instincts Yeah.

145

But then, as you pointed out,

146

the irony is that the ultimate capitalist thing of AI and robotics enabling prosperity for all and abundance of goods and services,

147

actually the capitalist implementation of AI and robotics, assuming it goes down the good path,

148

uh is is actually what results in the communist utopia

149

because fate is fate is an irony maximizer right and

150

and an actual socialism of maximum abundance of high income people

151

universal high income yeah like the the problem with communism uh is is this universal low income um

152

it's it's not that everyone gets elevated it's

153

that everyone gets oppressed except for a very small minority of politicians who live a life of luxury

154

that's what's happening every time it's been done yeah um

155

so um but then the the actual communist topia

156

if everyone gets anything they want will be will be

157

if will be achieved if it is achieved it will be achieved via capitalism because fate is an irony maximizer.

158

Thank you.

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ

AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर

IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत

शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ

शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें

QR स्कैन करें

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

अनुशंसित वीडियो

828 वाक्य

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

यह स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “馬斯克：不只基本收入，是「全民高收入」｜辦公室工作會「像閃電一樣」被 AI 取代，那剩下什麼工作？｜Joe Rogan 節目馬斯克｜真實訪談精選、單字解釋、雙語字幕” पर आधारित है। सबसे ज़्यादा दोहराए गए शब्द ये हैं: income, universal, debt, scenario, computer। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 158 वाक्य और 1934 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 14:11 लंबा है। वक्ता लगभग 136 शब्द प्रति मिनट की स्थिर गति से बोलता है, जो शैडोइंग के लिए आरामदायक है। 84% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं; बाकी शब्द अभ्यास से पहले देख लेना अच्छा रहेगा।

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो के 15 सीखने लायक शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
scenario संज्ञा	/sɪˈnɛəɹioʊ/	परिदृश्य
robotics संज्ञा	/ɹoʊˈbɑ.tɪks/	रोबॉटिक्स
abundance संज्ञा	/əˈbʌn.dn̩s/	प्रचुरता, अधिकता
calculation संज्ञा	/ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/	गणना, परिकलन
fate संज्ञा	/feɪt/	क़िस्मत, किस्मत
lightning संज्ञा	/ˈlaɪt.nɪŋ/	तड़ित, विद्युत
irony संज्ञा	/ˈaɪ.ɚ.ni/	विडम्बना, विडंबना
bankrupt विशेषण	/ˈbæŋk.ɹəpt/	दिवालिया, दिवलीया
solve क्रिया	/sɒlv/	सुलझाना, हल करना
communist संज्ञा	/ˈkɑ.mjə.nɪst/	साम्यवादी, कम्युनिस्ट
khan संज्ञा	/kɑːn/	खान, खन
robot संज्ञा	/ˈɹoʊ.bɑt/	रोबोट, यंत्रमानव
optional विशेषण	/ˈɑp.ʃə.nəl/	वैकल्पिक
capitalist संज्ञा	/ˈkæp.ɪ.tə.lɪst/	पूंजीपति
atom संज्ञा	/ˈætəm/	परमाणु, अणु

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
wake up क्रिया	/ˌweɪk ˈʌp/	जागना

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

वीडियो के छोटे, पूरे वाक्य जिन्हें आप रोज़ की बातचीत में इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं:

What kind of numbers are we talking about?
You're going to lose most drivers, right?
We haven't paved the rainforest.

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

वक्ता जिन संरचनाओं का सबसे अधिक प्रयोग करता है, वीडियो के असली शब्दों के साथ:

संरचना	वीडियो में
शर्त वाले वाक्य if + उपवाक्य, will/would + क्रिया — शर्त और उसका नतीजा	if everyone gets anything they want will be
“used to” used to + क्रिया — बीती आदत या स्थिति जो अब नहीं है	used to be · used to have
Passive voice be + past participle — ज़ोर इस पर कि क्या होता है, न कि कौन करता है	be lost · be implemented · are balanced
Present perfect have/has + past participle — बीता हुआ काम जिसका असर अभी भी है	haven't destroyed · haven't paved · have struggled

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

वक्ता 33 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे you're, can't, didn't। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।

“th” की ध्वनियाँ: math /mæθ/, wealthy /ˈwɛl.θi/, nonetheless /ˌnʌnðəˈlɛs/
“sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, socialist /ˈsoʊ.ʃə.lɪst/, essentially /ɪˈsɛnʃəli/, optional /ˈɑp.ʃə.nəl/, conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/
लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: universal /ˌjunəˈvɜɹs(ə)l/, essentially /ɪˈsɛnʃəli/, eliminate /ɪˈlɪm.ɪ.neɪt/, capitalist /ˈkæp.ɪ.tə.lɪst/, accelerate /ɪkˈsɛl.əˌɹeɪt/

हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:

/v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: universal /ˌjunəˈvɜɹs(ə)l/, solve /sɒlv/, poverty /ˈpɑːvɚti/, worker /ˈwɝ.kɚ/, wealthy /ˈwɛl.θi/
/z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: physically /ˈfɪz.ɪ.kli/, transaction /tɹænˈzækʃən/, capitalism /ˈkæp.ə.təlˌɪzm̩/, socialism /ˈsoʊʃəlɪzəm/, communism /ˈkɒmjᵿnɪz(ə)m/
/æ/ — “ऐ” से ज़्यादा खुला: calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, bankrupt /ˈbæŋk.ɹəpt/, capitalist /ˈkæp.ɪ.tə.lɪst/, atom /ˈætəm/, math /mæθ/

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
सामान्य गति पर एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें और हर वाक्य तब तक दोहराएँ जब तक आपकी लय वक्ता से न मिल जाए।
अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर scenario, robotics, abundance जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

शैडोइंग तकनीक: पूरी चरण-दर-चरण गाइड पढ़ें →

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

Harvard AI Professor: The People Most at Risk From AI Aren’t Who You Think

How America Got So Good At Buying Sh*t

Naomi Klein: The AI Bubble Is Going To Burst. This Is How We Prepare.

Jack Ma: Love is Important In Business | Davos 2018

How The Economic Machine Works by Ray Dalio

Way To Eradicate All Debt | Mr Robot

Extended interview: Jamie Dimon on AI, Iran and more

The 4-Hour Workweek in a World of AI

You Will Only Like Half of This Video

Jack Dorsey’s New Dessa AI Voice Sounds Scary Human

AI Destroyed My Profession

What Happens When Capitalism Doesn't Need Workers Anymore?