跟讀練習: Don't Let Your Arguments Die (Ep 06) - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。

87 句

如果句子過短或過長，請點選 Edit 進行調整。

Hello everyone, Argument Alice here.

Today I'm going to train you in a crucial part of building arguments.

Rebuilding arguments.

We have learned from Rebuttal Rosie that every speaker, after the first speaker, must provide a rebuttal to the arguments of the previous speaker.

I have told you that building an argument is like building a house.

Rosie teaches us that a rebuttal is like tearing down or deconstructing the house of your opponents.

When your opponents tear down your team's arguments,

you need to rebuild these arguments in the next speech. from attack.

In some ways, rebuilding arguments is like a rebuttal to the rebuttal of your opponents.

There are a few things to keep in mind when rebuilding our arguments.

Let's look at the key steps we need to take when rebuilding arguments.

Step 1: Let the audience know that you will begin to rebuild your partner's argument.

As always, Structure Sam reminds us to clearly signpost the

We should make it clear in our introduction that we will rebuild our partner's argument later in the speech.

When we get to that part in our speech, we should clearly let the audience know that we will rebuild.

Step 2.

Briefly summarize the argument of your partner and explain why it is so important.

In this step, we make sure to restate the main claim of our argument.

Step 3.

Briefly summarize the rebuttal of your opponent to this argument.

your team's argument.

Here you can restate the reasoning provided by your partner, you can restate the evidence and examples provided by your partner,

you can also offer new reasoning and evidence.

Step 5: Conclude the rebuilding.

Make it clear that you have finished this part of your speech, and you will now move on to the next section.

Let's take a look at these five steps in an actual debate.

We will first hear an example of an argument.

Then we will listen to an example of a rebuttal to that argument.

Finally, we will see an example of how to rebuild the argument.

Listen carefully to the original argument.

Ladies and gentlemen, my first argument to support the topic

that kids should not be allowed to have mobile phones is: mobile phones are bad for kids eyes.

Now, Let me explain the reasons why this is true.

First of all, Mobile phones have a light called a blue light.

That's what allows us to see the screen.

If kids look at this light too much, it will hurt their eyes.

Mobile phones have so many bright colors and images that are too bright for kids eyes.

Secondly, most kids cannot stop looking at their mobile phones.

Mobile phones have lots of games and videos that kids like to watch.

These games and videos are fun and exciting and kids can't stop watching them.

The bright colors and images are very attractive to kids.

Third, sometimes parents and teachers cannot control the mobile phone use.

Parents and teachers cannot watch their kids at all times because they're busy.

This means that kids can look at their mobile phones all day, which is bad for their eyes.

introduced some evidence to support this claim.

A new study says that smartphones may ruin your eyesight.

Researchers at the University of Toledo in Ohio have found that exposure to blue light, the glow emitted from most smartphones,

tablets, and laptops, promotes the growth of poisonous molecules in your eyes, leading to macular degeneration.

So, Ladies and gentlemen, we believe that kids should not have mobile phones because they are too harmful to kids' eyes.

Now, listen carefully to the rebuttal.

My opponent's first argument was mobile phones are harmful to kids' eyes.

They explained that the blue light on the phone, along with the inability of kids to control phone use, will damage their eyes and can even lead to blindness.

However, I would like to challenge this argument.

I think this argument is flawed for two reasons.

One, it is not true that kids cannot control their use of phones.

We believe that parents can control phone use through screen control apps.

We also think that kids can control their phone use and

that they prefer to play with friends and do things other than look at their phones.

So it is just not right that if kids have phones, they will look at them like zombies all day long.

2. Even if kids do look at mobile phones a lot, we don't think it will be that bad for kids' eyes.

The worst case scenario is that kids have to wear glasses, but we don't believe this is such a big deal.

Also, reading a lot of books can hurt kids' eyes too, but we would never say that kids should not be allowed to read.

Therefore, we think that the effects of mobile phones on kids' eyes are not a reason kids should not have mobile phones.

Now we can see an example of how to rebuild the original argument.

you I will now rebuild our team's argument.

In our team's first argument, my partner explained to you that mobile phones are harmful to students' eyes.

My opponent has attempted to rebut this argument by saying that parents can control the mobile phone use of their kids.

They have also explained that kids can manage their own mobile phone use

and that the impact on kids' eyes is not so bad.

However, this rebuttal is not enough to defeat our argument.

My partner clearly explained that mobile phones are addictive.

He explained that the phones are designed to be addictive.

My opponents have said that kids and parents can control themselves.

The bright images, sounds, and videos are addictive to kids.

If it is true that phones are addictive, it isn't easy for kids and parents to control.

Even if some kids and parents can monitor their phone use, many kids cannot.

So it is best to not allow them to have phones.

Therefore, our team's first argument still stands.

Sometimes, your opponent will not provide a rebuttal to one of your team's arguments In this case, it is imperative to point this out to the judge.

You can say: Ladies and gentlemen, my partner explained to you that mobile phones are harmful to students' eyes and that eyes are critical.

We have heard absolutely no response to this argument, which means that my opponents accept the argument to be true.

Remember, the debate is a team activity.

You should always support your partner's arguments and defend them from attack.

At the end of the debate, you want all of your team's arguments standing strong.

Now go out there and rebuild!

Thank you.

you you you

下載應用

流利口語所需的一切

AI 發音評分逐句打分

音標練習掌握每個音

詞彙學習建立你的詞庫

詞彙遊戲邊玩邊學

掃碼

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同頻道

FOR YOU

上下文與背景

在本期影片中，講者“Argument Alice”探討了如何重建論證，強調在辯論中每位發言者都必須回應前一位發言者的論點。通過以“重建論點”作為主題，Alice 針對辯論技巧進行深入講解，幫助學習者理解 rebuttal（反駁）與重建論證的重要性。這些內容不僅適用於學術辯論，也對日常英語口語交流大有裨益。

日常交流中的五個常用短語

“I believe that...” （我相信...）
“It's important to note that...” （重要的是...）
“In response to...” （對此...）
“Let's summarize...” （讓我們總結一下...）
“To conclude...” （最後，...）

逐步跟讀指南

在影片中，Alice 提供了重建論證的五個關鍵步驟。作為學習英語口語和發音的學習者，可以採用以下步驟進行跟讀練習，以提高你的英語表達能力。

第一步： 在開頭明確告知聽眾你將重建你的夥伴的論點。這是建立口語表達結構的一部分，像雅思口語練習一樣，通過明確的開場讓聽眾知道接下來要討論的內容。
第二步： 簡要總結你夥伴的論點，並解釋其重要性。這樣做可以幫助你在英語口語練習中，清晰表達自己的觀點。
第三步： 簡述對手對該論點的反駁。在這裡，你可以重複夥伴給出的論證理由和證據，同時可以加入新的推理和證據。
第四步： 重新構造你的論點，以回應對手的攻擊。在這一環節，通過跟讀,你可以提高英語發音的準確性。
第五步： 結束重建部分，明確告知聽眾你將進入下一個段落。這一技能對於想通過看YouTube學英語的學習者尤其有效，幫助他們構建邏輯清晰的論述。

通過這樣的導引，英語學習者能夠在實際對話或辯論中，靈活運用上面的短語以及步驟，增強自己的表達能力和反駁能力。開始 shadowing 練習吧，提升你的英語口語，達到更高的流利度與自信心！

影片中的語法

說話人最常用的結構，並附上影片中的原話：

結構	影片中的用法
條件句 if + 從句，will/would + 動詞 — 條件及其結果	if kids have phones, they will look
現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事	have learned · have told · have finished
被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼，而不是誰做的	should not be allowed · is flawed · are designed
定語從句 who / which + 從句 — 補充說明人或事物	day, which is · argument, which means

什麼是跟讀法？

跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧，最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓，並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大：您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同，跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性，語調，節奏，連讀，聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟讀法: 閱讀完整分步指南 →

跟讀練習: Don't Let Your Arguments Die (Ep 06) - 通過影片學習英語口語

選擇練習模式

下載應用

同頻道

How to Debate (Ep 04)

The Art of Debate Note-Taking (Ep 07)

How to Win A Debate (Ep 05)

How to Rebut An Argument (Ep 02)

How to Build an Argument with Argument Alice (Ep 01)

How to Engage in a Debate Crossfire (Ep 10)

Meet The Dialogy Debate Super Team (Ep 00)

How To Deliver A Speech: Eye-Contact (Ep 08)

How To Make A Debate Speech (Ep 03)

How To Deliver A Speech: Volume (Ep 09)

推薦影片

How to Win Every Argument (Even if You Are Wrong)

UNIT 9 CD2 TRACK 2 COMPLETE FIRST

The Secret to Explaining Your Opinions in English | English Podcast For Daily Conversations

How to debate in English: Vocabulary and Phrases

Sometimes, You Don't Have to Prove Yourself

[B2] What Do You Think About Teamwork? | English Listening & Speaking Practice

Advanced Speaking Practice (Persuasive Techniques)

How to Speak Better Than 99% of People (5 Frameworks)

English Podcast for Learning English | How to Continue Conversation in English | English Practice

Building Resilience: Bouncing Back from Setbacks | B1 English Shadowing

上下文與背景

日常交流中的五個常用短語

逐步跟讀指南

影片中的語法

什麼是跟讀法？