Shadowing Practice: Einstein’s beef with quantum physics, explained | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
57 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Einstein is celebrated for giving us the special theory of relativity.
2
The fact that nothing goes faster than light, time is the fourth dimension.
3
But he didn't come up with the equations.
4
That was the interpretation, the narrative of the equations.
5
And it's the same with any other theory in physics.
6
With quantum mechanics it's different.
7
We have the equations of quantum mechanics, but we can't agree on what that equation means.
8
Schrodinger's equation being the most famous one, we can crank the handle and produce numbers from the equation, but the narrative, the story,
9
the explanation is still something that we're arguing about.
10
And that bugs me.
11
By the end of the 19th century, it was already known that we needed some new physics to explain mysterious phenomena,
12
X -rays, like radioactivity, that energy seemed to be coming out of nowhere, to understand the behavior or the structure of the atom.
13
And so when quantum mechanics came along, it wasn't because physicists were sitting scratching their heads,
14
thinking there must be some deeper understanding of the nature of reality.
15
I know, let's come up with quantum mechanics.
16
It was forced on physicists because of experimental results
17
that were inexplicable it's a fuzzy probabilistic world things are never
18
behaving in one way for certain atoms can have two energies
19
at the same time electrons can be in two places at
20
the same time particles aren't discrete little lumps they can sometimes
21
behave like spread out waves of probability it's really down at a level far beyond anything
22
that we can visualize or imagine
23
if we think about everyday objects a tennis ball for example subject to the laws of newtonian mechanics.
24
You drop down orders of magnitude down to a millimetre, down to a micrometre, down to the scale of individual cells or bacteria.
25
Ultimately, when you get down to something like a billionth of a metre, then you start to encounter the fuzziness of the quantum world.
26
The founding fathers of quantum mechanics in the 1920s, people like the Danish physicist Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli.
27
And they realized they could make predictions for the results of measurements.
28
But you only make the connection with the real world if you look.
29
So that's how they got away with not needing a narrative.
30
The shut up and calculate interpretation.
31
More correctly, it's known as the Copenhagen narrative.
32
But now, many physicists, including myself, argue that it's not a narrative at all.
33
It's a bury your head in the sand approach.
34
Einstein was very unhappy about this, by the way.
35
He said, no, look, the job of physics is to know and understand how the world is, not just to make predictions about the results of experiments,
36
that sort of operationalist view.
37
Well, fine, that's useful, but that doesn't give us real understanding.
38
That's why we still need a narrative.
39
The knowledge of quantum mechanics, together with Einstein's theories of relativity, really gave us the modern world.
40
We wouldn't have developed understanding of materials and how they conduct electricity, so we wouldn't have understood semiconductors we wouldn't have developed silicon chips,
41
therefore we wouldn't have computers.
42
I wouldn't be talking here in this medium today were it not for our quantum understanding.
43
But there are aspects of the quantum world that are more mysterious.
44
Quantum entanglement, for example, the idea that,
45
let's say, two electrons that are separated in space can nevertheless somehow behave in a coordinated way.
46
There are speculative ideas about whether space itself is connected together via quantum entanglement.
47
We don't all need to be experts in quantum mechanics.
48
Not even the smartest quantum physicist knows how stuff goes on inside their smartphone.
49
But we are going to be developing ideas like quantum cryptography, quantum computing, quantum sensors.
50
These are ideas and technologies that are going to affect us in our daily lives.
51
So we do need to have enough of an appreciation of the science simply to know what to trust, who to trust.
52
As we peel back layers of the onion about the nature of reality, we find deeper mysteries inside.
53
But it's also true that we are learning more.
54
We are becoming more enlightened.
55
We know a lot about how the world works now, but that doesn't mean we have reached the end of the road.
56
Now, I think there's going to be more weirdness coming down the line, And that's great.
57
I look forward to it.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
C11
Why schools of the future will be designed with geneticists | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C116
Why successful people set habits, not just goals | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
Would a society based on genetics be… good? | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Is success genetic? | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
Hit peak performance with the power of habit | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C175
What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
The lost art of accomplishment without burnout | Cal Newport for Big Think +
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
A mind-blowing explanation of symmetry | Frank Wilczek for Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
What happens to your brain when you’re dreaming
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
How evolution works, in 54 minutes | Sean B. Carroll: Full Interview
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C16
Your genes affect your education. Here’s why that’s controversial. | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
How do elite performers automate their habits? | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
What if quantum physics could eradicate illness? | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
Why softness beats stress | Giulia Enders
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C13
Your brain wasn't built to hold this much information | Richard Cytowic
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
Who decides what is socially “normal”? | Christine Emba
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C120
Harvard negotiator explains how to argue | Dan Shapiro
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
Curiosity Is a Superpower — If You Have the Courage to Use It | Big Think
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
Physicist Brian Cox explains quantum physics in 22 minutes
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
A neuroscientist’s guide to reclaiming your brain | Nicole Vignola
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
✨ Aanbevolen Video
C181 zinnen
Mathematician Collapses All Functions to One Weird Formula
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1182 zinnen
The Uncertainty Principle: What Does It Mean, How Does It Work?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
322 zinnen
ALBERT EINSTEIN liệu có phải MỘT NGƯỜI TỐT? | Minh HD | Thế giới
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
39 zinnen
Why Walls STOP Light Waves But Not Radio Waves?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1552 zinnen
The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C18
156 zinnen
How Quantum Batteries Break Every Rule of Charging
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1114
14 zinnen
Arguments for God: The Fine Tuning Argument
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
162 zinnen
Crypto Agility Explained: Protect Data from Quantum Computing Threats
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
6 zinnen
Why is Stephen Fry so passionate about the ancient Greeks?
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
427 zinnen
The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Wat je leert
Met deze video leer je niet alleen over quantumfysica, maar ook hoe je complexe ideeën helder uitspreekt en hoe je langere zinnen met rust doorspreekt. Daarnaast oefen je actief luisteren naar wetenschappelijke termen, wat je helpt om ze later zelf te gebruiken. Ideaal voor wie wil leren engels met video's!
Luister naar deze geluiden
Let op de verbindingen tussen woorden, zoals "the fact that" die klinkt als "th'fact that" of "it's a" die wordt verkort tot "it's a". Ook het "t" in woorden als "but" of "not" wordt vaak zachter uitgesproken, bijna als een "d". Deze kleine details maken je Engels natuurlijker en helpen bij schaduwspreken.
Spreek het zoals een native
Om de rhythm van de spreker na te volgen, let op de klemtoon op belangrijke woorden zoals "interpretation", "probabilistic" of "entanglement". Zorg dat je de zinnen niet te snel doorspreekt; pauzeer even na commas of punten, net zoals Jim Al-Khalili doet. Gebruik een shadowing app of shadowing site om te oefenen: speel een korte fragment af, pauzeer en herhaal het onmiddellijk na. Dit helpt je om de intonatie en timing te leren. Met een beetje oefening zul je merken dat je steeds vloeiender spreekt – en dat is een geweldige stap vooruit!
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.