Практика Shadowing: Why Are US Politics Today So Divisive?: Crash Course US Government #1 - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Каждый режим открывает полноэкранную комнату практики.

136 предложений

Если предложения слишком короткие или длинные, нажмите Edit, чтобы их изменить.

Maybe you've noticed.

The echo chambers are loud.

The divisions wide.

Our Fox News dads and our MSNBC moms may as well be living in different dimensions.

And our majestic eagle friend is looking way less majestic than when we last saw him.

You okay there, Baldi?

Stop picking at your feathers.

You're only going to make it worse.

So how did we get here?

Screaming at each other across an ever -growing cavernous divide?

And what does that mean for the fate of this country?

Hi, I'm Kushan Avidar, this is Crash Course, and we're answering big questions on US government.

While it's true that the media we consume contributes greatly to our super -polarized political culture,

to understand the full scope of what's going on, we have to take an even wider view because this thing we've got going on goes back a long time.

For decades, there's been a widening divide between the two major political parties in terms of political ideology,

where people fall on the spectrum of beliefs about how society should work.

Very simply, from left to right, liberal to conservative.

And when we say liberal and conservative, we're not actually talking about Democrats and Republicans, at least not yet.

Liberal really just means falling on the left side of our political spectrum.

These folks tend to support more government involvement in people's lives.

Conservatives on the right side of the spectrum want the government to conserve the status quo, which usually means less intervention both socially and economically.

So for example, a liberal person would probably support government -funded healthcare, while a conservative person might think that's something better left to private companies.

In a centrist political culture, most voters hold moderate views, falling somewhere between liberal and conservatives.

Sure, you've got your fair share of leftists and right -wingers, but the largest cluster of voters are hanging out in the middle, and in an election, they could swing either way.

But in a culture of political polarization, like ours, voters are camped out farther away from each other in their views.

These days, we tend to think of the political spectrum as falling along party lines,

with liberal meaning the same thing as Democrat and conservative meaning the same thing as Republican, with a vast, seemingly uncrossable canyon between them.

But the left -right divide between the parties wasn't always this clear cut.

So what happened?

To help explain things, let's head over to my colleague, historian Buff.

Just Buff, that's his whole name.

Hi there, Kusha.

You are not what I was expecting.

What do you mean?

Don't worry about it, Buff.

Go ahead, friend.

You got it, Kusha.

Well, back in the day, political parties didn't really mean the same thing they do now.

There were liberals and conservatives sprinkled throughout both parties.

I'll give you an example.

In the wake of the Civil War, in the period known as Reconstruction, who do you think led the charge to expand voting and civil rights for Black Americans?

It was liberal Republicans from New England.

And who do you think instituted Jim Crow laws that made it harder for Black Americans to exercise those rights?

It was conservative Southern Democrats. In fact, the voting records of Southern Democrats in Congress skewed significantly more

conservative than their Northern Republican brethren until well into the 20th century.

And here's an interesting way that shows up.

In 1964, President Lyndon B.

Johnson, himself a Democrat, signed the Civil Rights Act into law.

The act made it illegal to discriminate and segregate by race in public spaces, and it generally enjoyed pretty bipartisan support in Congress.

But the folks who didn't support it, most weren't Republicans.

They were Dems from Johnson's own party.

When white, conservative Southern Democrats saw other Democratic presidents like LBJ and his predecessor JFK embracing civil rights legislation,

it sent a message.

Democrats became the party more associated with the civil rights movement.

So those conservative Democrats steadily left the party for the Republican Party, or died out.

Congress was pretty old, even back in the 60s.

Meanwhile, those liberal Republicans decided to fully align themselves with the Party of Civil Rights and made the swap over to the Dems.

Back to you, Kusha.

I'm sorry.

Thanks, Buff.

That is just one example of how party alignment shifted during the mid -20th century, giving us the system we know today,

with Democrats being pretty universally liberal or left -leaning and Republicans being pretty universally conservative or right -leaning with a,

you guessed it, ever -widening gap between them.

These days, when Congress does manage to get legislation passed, it's often not with the same bipartisan support of the days of yore.

Like 2025's One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed through the House with support from 218 out of 220 total House Republicans and,

count it, zero Democrats.

The 1960s set us off on a journey where conservative and liberal have become more and more synonymous with Republican and Democrat.

And things have started to turn into kind of a self -perpetuating spiral of polarized intensity.

As the parties become more associated with specific values, like liberal support for LGBTQ plus rights, or conservative support for the Second Amendment,

they attract people with those same values, which then enforce those conservative or liberal associations.

All of this makes it a lot easier for people to fit neatly into slots along the left -right continuum, a process known as ideological sorting.

Essentially, it's become a lot easier to guess which party somebody supports just by their stance on individual things like abortion, taxes, gun control, foreign policy,

the environment, or importantly, their go -to news network, and a lot harder for voters to hang out in the center.

But it's not just that Democrats and Republicans have grown apart in terms of how they think about issues.

They've also grown apart in terms of who they are as people.

Until recently, you couldn't reliably predict someone's political party based on their gender or race or anything like that.

But thanks to what's known as social sorting, for the past two decades or so, certain identities have become increasingly tied to one party over another.

Take gender for example.

Across the entire US population, men today are more likely to identify as Republicans and women more likely to identify as Democrats.

To be clear, that doesn't mean there aren't men or women who buck the trend.

There definitely are.

It's just that gender is becoming a stronger predictor.

And so is race.

White voters are more likely than any other racial or ethnic group to identify as Republican, while Black voters are more likely than any other group to identify as Democrats.

So even though women in general more often vote Democrat, if we look at exit poll data on votes cast by white women in the 2024 election,

the Republican candidate Donald Trump comes out four percentage points higher than his opponent Kamala Harris.

On top of all these other factors, there's a growing geographic divide too.

People in rural areas increasingly identify as Republicans, while people in urban areas identify as Democrats.

So thanks to the combined effects of ideological sorting and social sorting, our politics aren't just something we believe, they're becoming who we are.

So it didn't take just one ingredient to cook up our current situation.

It was decades of shifting party ideology, calcifying identities, and increasing partisanship from both sides.

And as the gap between us widens, it's harder and harder to find common ground.

What do we have left?

Gardening?

The Bachelor?

The Bachelor in Paradise?

Of course, political polarization has way bigger consequences than, like, it's hard to know what to talk about at family dinner.

As political affiliation becomes more closely linked to other core parts of who people are,

it stops being just a political identity and becomes something new — a mega -identity, or one identity and set of values to rule all others.

100

The term mega -identity was coined by political scientist Liliana Mason in the 2010s.

101

It describes a pattern where someone's partisan identity, whether they define themselves as Republican or Democrat,

102

affects how they see and interact with people that identify the other way.

103

And as a result, we're more likely to think bad stuff about the other side or even view them as a threat.

104

Research has shown a rise in what's known as affective polarization, a kind of polarization that goes way beyond whether or not the two sides disagree on policy issues,

105

dipping into big emotions like distrust, animosity, and contempt.

106

In other words, the more polarized we get, the less we recognize each other as 3D human beings and the more we cast each other as 2D bad guys.

107

And that has direct consequences on Election Day.

108

Voters are increasingly motivated less by what they like about their own party's platform

109

and more by negative partisanship or their hatred for the other party.

110

This isn't new by any means.

111

Negative campaign ads were swaying your grandpappy's vote before you were born.

112

But as Republicans and Democrats have gotten more polarized, negative partisanship has become increasingly powerful.

113

More and more, we're out there voting against someone instead of for someone to the point where we might start to ignore candidates'

114

actual political platforms.

115

And I know we've been talking about national stuff, but the inability to divorce politics and partisanship can also affect voting habits at the more local level,

116

leading to nationalization.

117

Basically, as the parties have divided into these two big,

118

at -odds camps, voters increasingly cast ballots based on what they know about the national party they identify with or identify against.

119

Not necessarily what's happening in their own town.

120

And unfortunately for us, our country, and our little eagle friend Baldi,

121

all these effects of increasing partisanship feed back into the causes.

122

It is a vicious cycle, creating a feedback loop that's really shi - bad.

123

Because not only is it seeping into how we, the citizens, interact with each other, but how the people running our government work together to actually get stuff done.

124

Just because something's hard doesn't mean it's not possible.

125

Our government and our country as a whole has weathered plenty of challenges

126

and come out on the other side with a desire to be better.

127

And today there are plenty of people, both in the government and on the street, willing to reach across the aisle to work together for a better future.

128

Today's super -polarized politics have been brewing for decades, but it's not the end.

129

And there are plenty of people thinking there must be a better way.

130

So next time, that's exactly what we're asking.

131

Why does the US only have two major political parties?

132

This episode of Crash Course Big Questions on US Government was produced in partnership with USA Facts,

133

a non -partisan civic tech project that makes government data easier to understand.

134

For more resources that go along with these videos, go to usafacts .org slash crash course.

135

Thanks for watching this episode of Crash Course Big Questions on US Government, which was filmed in Indianapolis, Indiana, and was made with the help of all these nice people.

136

If you want to help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever, you can join our community on Patreon.

Скачать приложение

Всё для свободной речи

ИИ-оценка произношенияОценка каждой фразы

Практика IPAОсвойте каждый звук

СловарьСоберите свой словарный запас

Игра со словамиУчитесь играя

Сканировать QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Тот же канал

The Bicameral Congress: Crash Course Government and Politics #2

Daily ConversationHigh School StudentsUniversity Students

Crash Course US History Preview

Daily ConversationUniversity Students

What's all the Yellen About? Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve: Crash Course Economics #10

Daily ConversationUniversity Students

Defense Against the Dark Arts of Influence: Crash Course Business Soft Skills #2

Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

Planning & Organization: Crash Course Study Skills #4

Business EnglishHigh School StudentsUniversity Students

FOR YOU

Лексика и советы по произношению к этому уроку

Этот урок разговорной практики уровня B2 построен на видео «Why Are US Politics Today So Divisive?: Crash Course US Government». Чаще всего повторяются слова: Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, identify. В этом видео 136 предложений и 1899 слов для шедоуинга. Речь длится 12:07. Говорящий говорит в естественном темпе, около 157 слов в минуту, близком к повседневной речи. 84% слов входят в 3000 самых частых слов английского языка; остальные стоит разобрать перед занятием.

Ключевая лексика этого видео

Самые сложные слова из видео (15), с произношением и значением:

Слово	Произношение	Значение
voter существительное	/ˈvoʊtɚ/	избира́тель, избира́тельница
partisanship существительное	/ˌpɑːtɪˈzænʃɪp/	парти́йность, полити́ческие симпа́тии
divide глагол	/dɪˈvaɪd/	дели́ть, разделя́ть
polarization существительное	/ˌpoʊlərɪˈzeɪʃən/	поляриза́ция
widen глагол	/ˈwaɪdn̩/	расширя́ться, расши́риться
bipartisan прилагательное	/baɪˈpɑɹ.tə.sən/	двухпарти́йный
majestic прилагательное	/məˈd͡ʒɛstɪk/	вели́чественный
ideological прилагательное	/ˌaɪ.di.əˈlɑ.d͡ʒɪ.kəl/	идеологи́ческий
partisan существительное	/ˈpɑː.tɪˌzæn/	приве́рженец, сторо́нник
ideology существительное	/aɪ.diˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	идеоло́гия, мировоззре́ние
interact глагол	/ɪn.təˈɹækt/	взаимоде́йствовать
consequence существительное	/ˈkɑn.sɪ.kwəns/	после́дствие, сле́дствие
eagle существительное	/ˈiːɡəl/	орёл, орли́ца
lean глагол	/ˈliːn/	наклоня́ться, наклони́ться
affective прилагательное	/əˈfɛktɪv/	эмоциона́льный

Фразовые глаголы, которые вы услышите

Слово	Произношение	Значение
come out глагол	/ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/	выходи́ть, вы́йти
die out глагол		вымира́ть, вы́мереть
go ahead глагол	/ˌɡoʊ əˈhɛd/	дава́й, приступа́йте
go back глагол		возвраща́ться, возврати́ться
show up глагол		объявля́ться, объяви́ться

Фразы, которые стоит повторять

Короткие законченные фразы из видео, которые пригодятся в повседневном разговоре:

You're only going to make it worse.
What do you mean?
I'll give you an example.
What do we have left?

Грамматика в этом видео

Конструкции, которые говорящий использует чаще всего, с точными словами из видео:

Конструкция	В видео
Present Perfect Continuous have/has been + -ing — действие началось раньше и продолжается	we've been talking · have been brewing
Present Perfect have/has + причастие прошедшего времени — прошлое действие, важное сейчас	you've noticed · there's been · have become
Пассивный залог be + причастие прошедшего времени — важно, что происходит, а не кто это делает	are camped · was coined · were born
Придаточные определительные who / which + предложение — уточнение о человеке или предмете	women who buck · Government, which was

Произношение, на которое стоит обратить внимание

Говорящий использует 27 сокращённых и редуцированных форм, например we're, didn't, aren't. Произносите их коротко, так, как слышите.

Звуки «th»: brethren /ˈbɹɛðɹən/, feather /ˈfɛðə/
Звуки «sh» и «zh»: partisanship /ˌpɑːtɪˈzænʃɪp/, polarization /ˌpoʊlərɪˈzeɪʃən/, affiliation /əˌfɪliˈeɪʃən/, vicious /ˈvɪʃəs/, socially /ˈsoʊʃəli/
Длинные слова — следите за ударением: partisanship /ˌpɑːtɪˈzænʃɪp/, polarization /ˌpoʊlərɪˈzeɪʃən/, bipartisan /baɪˈpɑɹ.tə.sən/, universally /ˌjunɪˈvɝsəli/, ideological /ˌaɪ.di.əˈlɑ.d͡ʒɪ.kəl/

Звуки, трудные для русскоязычных:

/w/ — губы округлены, это не /v/: widen /ˈwaɪdn̩/, consequence /ˈkɑn.sɪ.kwəns/, perpetuate /pɚˈpɛt͡ʃəˌweɪt/, winger /ˈwɪŋ.ɚ/, sway /ˈsweɪ̯/
/h/ — лёгкий выдох, а не русское «х»: historian /hɪˈstɔɹi.ən/, hatred /ˈheɪtɹɪd/
Звонкие согласные в конце слова — не оглушайте их: polarize /ˈpəʊ.lə.ɹaɪz/, divide /dɪˈvaɪd/, affective /əˈfɛktɪv/, conserve /kənˈsɜː(ɹ)v/, colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/

Как заниматься с этим видео

Прослушайте всё видео один раз молча и выпишите незнакомые слова.
Начните со скорости 0,75×, повторяйте предложение за предложением и вернитесь к обычной скорости, когда станет легко.
Запишите себя и сравните с оригиналом, обращая внимание на такие слова, как voter, partisanship, divide.

Что такое техника Shadowing?

Shadowing — это научно обоснованная техника изучения языка, изначально разработанная для подготовки профессиональных переводчиков и популяризированная полиглотом доктором Александром Аргуэльесом. Метод прост, но эффективен: вы слушаете аудио на английском от носителей языка и немедленно повторяете вслух — как тень, следующая за говорящим с задержкой в 1–2 секунды. В отличие от пассивного прослушивания или грамматических упражнений, Shadowing заставляет мозг и мышцы рта одновременно обрабатывать и воспроизводить реальные речевые паттерны. Исследования показывают, что это значительно улучшает точность произношения, интонацию, ритм, связную речь, понимание на слух и беглость речи — что делает его одним из самых эффективных методов для подготовки к IELTS Speaking и реального общения на английском.

Техника шедоуинга: читать полное пошаговое руководство →

Практика Shadowing: Why Are US Politics Today So Divisive?: Crash Course US Government #1 - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Скачать приложение

The Bicameral Congress: Crash Course Government and Politics #2

Crash Course US History Preview

What's all the Yellen About? Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve: Crash Course Economics #10

How Water Shapes the Land: Crash Course Geology #9

How Often do Asteroids Hit the Earth?: Crash Course Geology #20

Crash Course Sex Ed Preview

Derivatives: Crash Course Physics #2

Indus Valley Civilization: Crash Course World History #2

Ancient Egypt: Crash Course World History #4

What is Engineering?: Crash Course Engineering #1

The Persians & Greeks: Crash Course World History #5

The Secret to Business Writing: Crash Course Business - Soft Skills #3

Supervised Learning: Crash Course AI #2

The Periodic Table: Crash Course Chemistry #4

Where Do Diamonds Come From?: Crash Course Geology #8

Tissues, Part 1: Crash Course Anatomy & Physiology #2

Where Did Democracy Come From, and Does It Still Work?

The Nucleus: Crash Course Chemistry #1

Defense Against the Dark Arts of Influence: Crash Course Business Soft Skills #2

Planning & Organization: Crash Course Study Skills #4

The Liberalism to Fascism Pipeline (Neoliberalism Explained)

How Can You Change Somebody's Opinion?

What is the role of emotion in political psychology?

Why Have We Become So Mean?

Cocky MAGA Kid Can't DEFEND Trump's Actions and RUNS AWAY

Toby Young | Woke Culture HAS Gone Too Far - 3/8 | Oxford Union

World Order By Henry Kissinger

Both Russia and America only pursue power, not principle, argues Moosa Haraj

How Culture affects your Personality

Would a society based on genetics be… good? | Kathryn Paige Harden