Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: The Internet is Worse Than Ever – Now What?
Đang tạo bài học...
1
In 2022, nearly half of Americans expected a civil war in the next few years.
2
One in five now believes political violence is justified.
3
And it's not just the US, but around the world.
4
People increasingly see themselves as part of opposing teams.
5
There are many different reasons for this, but one gets blamed a lot.
6
Social media.
7
Social media divides us, makes us more extreme and less empathetic.
8
It riles us up or sucks us into doom-scrolling, making us stressed and depressed.
9
It feels like we need to touch grass and escape to the real world.
10
New research shows that we might have largely misinterpreted why this is the case.
11
It turns out that the social media internet may uniquely undermine the way our brains work, but not in the way you think.
12
The myth of the filter bubble.
13
You've probably heard about online filter bubbles.
14
give you exactly what you want or what they think you want.
15
You only see information that shows you opinions that agree with yours, while dissenting opinions or information are filtered out.
16
Since you only see content close to your world view, more extreme and toxic opinions suddenly seem less extreme.
17
You're trapped in a radicalizing filter bubble and your view of the world becomes narrower and more extreme.
18
But is that true?
19
Extreme filter bubbles seem to be rather rare.
20
Studies that investigated what people actually look at online, or are shown by search engines, found little evidence that you are ideologically isolated.
21
It's the exact opposite.
22
Online you are constantly confronted with opinions and worldviews that are not your own.
23
It turns out that the place where you are the most ideologically isolated is your real life, in the real world, with real people.
24
Your real world interactions with your friends, family, colleagues and neighbors are much less diverse than your online bubble.
25
The filter bubble exists in your real life, not online.
26
Okay, wait.
27
Online filter bubbles have been the prevailing explanation as to why
28
we've all started hating each other more over the last two decades.
29
If that's not the case, shouldn't the internet open our minds and make us more empathetic with each other?
30
Unfortunately, your brain is stupid it.
31
Your brain is stupid.
32
Human brains didn't evolve to understand the true nature of reality, but to navigate and maintain social structures.
33
Our ancestors desperately needed each other to survive, so our brains had to make sure we cooperated.
34
That's why social isolation or exclusion feels so horrible, because it was actually life-threatening.
35
A tribe that that worked together survived.
36
A divided tribe died.
37
The way communities worked for thousands of years is that sure, you may have disliked a neighbor, but because you lived close to each other, you also rooted for the same sports club or saw them at church.
38
You both thought that the people from the other village were idiots.
39
Being physically close made you familiar and created similarities that bridge the gap of different worldviews so you didn't murder each other.
40
And your worldview was probably not that different in the first place because it was formed by the same local culture.
41
When our brains evolved, this was enough.
42
Whoever was around was similar to us.
43
liked what was similar to us.
44
This kept us aligned enough to work together despite our differences.
45
As humanity moved on from small tribes to towns and cities, from chiefdoms to kingdoms to nations,
46
our brains and our communities had to adapt to more diverse sets of neighbors.
47
We began to meet on the town square or in universities where we argued and screamed at each other, but in the grand scheme of things, communities were still relatively isolated,
48
we were still pretty similar and aligned with the people around us.
49
Conflict and disagreement are not a bad thing per se.
50
Tension over how we should live can create new and wonderful things.
51
Our values, norms and taboos are always evolving and whatever we think is normal today will not be normal in the future.
52
But we also need social glue to hold our societies together
53
because our brains don't care about the meta-level of humanity but about being safe in a tribe.
54
Until about 20 years ago, we did something truly new that hit our brains like a freight train.
55
The social media internet, the digital town square.
56
Don't you dare disagree with me.
57
Social sorting.
58
In a nutshell, our brains are not able to process the amount of disagreement we encounter on the social internet.
59
The very mechanisms
60
that made it possible for our ancestors to work together in
61
the first place are derailed in ways we were not prepared for.
62
Whether you want it to or not, your brain sorts people by worldviews and opinions into teams.
63
This is not simply tribalism, it goes further.
64
Researchers have called this process social sorting.
65
On the digital town square, you encounter people that express opinions or share information that clash with your worldview.
66
But unlike your neighbor, they don't root for your local sports club.
67
You're missing the local social glue your brain needs to align with them.
68
your brain, the disagreement between yourself and them becomes a central part of their identity.
69
And this makes it less likely that you will seriously consider their position or opinion in the future.
70
If you hear bad things about them, your brain is much more likely to believe it uncritically.
71
On the flip side, there are people who share your worldview
72
and are maybe even more similar to you than many people in your real life, which makes your brain like them a lot and kind of hyper-align with them.
73
People who think like you are probably good people
74
because you're a good person and whatever social group you belong to is good.
75
So your brain is more likely to believe their opinions.
76
If you hear bad things about them, your brain is much more likely to dismiss it uncritically.
77
The engagement driven social internet makes it worse because it wants to keep you online as long as possible.
78
And the most engaging emotion is, unfortunately, anger.
79
The more angry you get, the more likely you are to share and engage.
80
And this leads to social media amplifying the most extreme and controversial opinions.
81
It optimizes not only to show us disagreement, but the worst disagreement possible.
82
And because your stupid brain is sorting people into teams, whatever the worst opinions are, it assigns the same opinions to everybody on the other team.
83
What's striking and new about online polarization is that all the aspects of our lives that make us individuals, our lifestyle choices, the comedians or shows we watch,
84
our religion, sense of fashion and so on, are condensed, making it seem that they're parts of opposing and mutually exclusive identities.
85
This simplifies and distorts disagreements about how we should run society
86
so much that it often seems as if the people on the other team are actively, willfully making the world worse.
87
That they are almost evil beyond convincing with rationality, facts or civil discussion.
88
While you are of course on the correct team, it may be hard to process that you may seem like that to people on the other team.
89
On a societal level, this is dissolving the social glue that's the foundation of our democracies.
90
If we think our neighbors are evil, how can we live together?
91
This is especially bad in the US, where the two-party system makes it extra easy to think of people in terms of teams.
92
Negative opinion about the other party has reached record highs.
93
Okay, is there something we can learn from this?
94
Is there something we can do?
95
Something more positive?
96
Opinion part.
97
In the end, it's important to be aware of what social media does to your brain.
98
It's easier to change yourself than to change the world, so you can self-examine why you believe the things you believe,
99
and whether you dismiss or believe information based on who the person is who is stating that information.
100
The internet comes with a lot of ups and downs, and just like we had to adapt from living in small tribes to living in cities,
101
we need to adapt to the information age where we have access to billions of people.
102
Evolution is too slow, so we need to find models that work with what our brains are able to tolerate.
103
One model that seemed to work well was the pre-social media internet old people might remember.
104
Bulletin boards, forums, blogs.
105
The main difference to today was two-fault.
106
For one, there were no algorithms fighting to keep you online at any cost.
107
At some point you were done with the internet for the day, as mind-blowing as this may sound.
108
But more importantly, the old internet was very fractured, split into thousands of different communities, like small villages gathering around shared beliefs and interests.
109
These villages were separated from each other by digital rivers or mountains.
110
These communities worked because they mirrored real life much more than social media.
111
Each village had its own culture and set of rules.
112
Maybe one community was into rough humor and soft moderation, another had strict rules and banned easily.
113
If you didn't play by the village rules, you'd be banned.
114
you could just go and move to another village that suited you better.
115
So instead of all of us gathering in one place, overwhelming our brains at a town square that in the end just leads us to going insane,
116
one solution to achieve less social sorting may be extremely simple.
117
Go back to smaller online communities.
118
Because what our stupid brains don't realize is that we are actually all on the same team.
119
Humanity, on a wet rock, speeding through space in a universe that doesn't think about us.
120
We are all in this together.
121
But until our brains adjust to being able to deal with that, we might be better off being a tiny bit separated.
122
One of the worst things about the media we consume is that most news organizations tend to cater to one team, making you feel you're on the correct side.
123
Ground News, the sponsor of this video, is trying to make these biases more transparent by giving you tools that help you think critically about the information you consume,
124
a mission we wholeheartedly support.
125
Ground News gathers related articles from around the world in one place, so you can compare how different outlets and sides cover them.
126
They provide context about the source of the information, if they have a political bias, how reliable their reporting is, and who owns them.
127
This makes the news less stressful and makes you understand the world much better.
128
If you want to check them out, go to ground.news.nuchal.
129
If you sign up through this link, you'll get 30% off their unlimited access plan.
130
A subscription supports Kurzgesagt and Ground News, so they can continue to build more media literacy tools.
131
Our favorite tool has a personal background.
132
In 2018, Kurzgesagt founder Philip, who wrote this video, was going through chemotherapy and was intensely bored.
133
So he ended up reading all the big German newspapers, even the ones he hated front to back, every single day.
134
Aside from the obvious biases, what was the most shocking were the stories each side did not talk about.
135
Both sides ignored things that are inconvenient to their worldviews.
136
The Ground News blindspot feed highlights this exact thing, showing you news stories that are heavily covered by one side of the political spectrum and ignored by the other.
137
So check them out at ground.news.nutshell to make sure you're seeing the full picture.
138
you
Giới thiệu về bài học này
Bài học hôm nay tập trung vào việc cải thiện khả năng nói tiếng Anh của bạn thông qua việc luyện nghe nói qua video. Bạn sẽ tìm hiểu về những thách thức mà công nghệ mạng xã hội mang lại cho xã hội và con người, đồng thời cải thiện phát âm tiếng Anh chuẩn của mình bằng cách nghe và lặp lại các câu nói từ video. Điều này không chỉ giúp bạn hiểu rõ hơn về nội dung mà còn giúp bạn tăng cường khả năng giao tiếp và mở rộng vốn từ vựng của mình.
Từ vựng và cụm từ chính
- filter bubble - bong bóng lọc
- ideological isolation - sự cô lập về tư tưởng
- empathy - sự đồng cảm
- social structures - cấu trúc xã hội
- radicalizing - cực đoan hóa
- dissension - sự bất đồng
- tribe - bộ lạc
- community - cộng đồng
Mẹo thực hành
Khi luyện tập với video này, hãy chú ý đến tốc độ và ngữ điệu của người nói. Bạn có thể áp dụng phương pháp shadow speech để theo dõi và lặp lại các câu nói. Đầu tiên, hãy xem qua video một lần để nắm bắt nội dung chính. Sau đó, hãy xem lại và dừng lại ở các đoạn ngắn để thực hành shadow speak – nói lại ngay sau khi nghe. Điều này sẽ giúp bạn phát âm tiếng Anh chuẩn hơn và cảm nhận được các sắc thái cảm xúc của người nói.
Khi lặp lại, hãy cố gắng bắt chước không chỉ âm thanh mà còn cả ngữ điệu và nhấn mạnh của câu. Nếu video có tốc độ quá nhanh, bạn có thể sử dụng chức năng thay đổi tốc độ trên YouTube để làm chậm lại, điều này sẽ giúp bạn dễ dàng lắng nghe và phát âm theo từng từ một cách rõ ràng.
Cuối cùng, hãy luyện nghe nói qua video thường xuyên để cải thiện kỹ năng giao tiếp của bạn, và nhớ rằng thực hành làm cho bạn trở nên hoàn hảo hơn!
Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?
Shadowing là kỹ thuật học ngôn ngữ có cơ sở khoa học, ban đầu được phát triển cho chương trình đào tạo phiên dịch viên chuyên nghiệp và được phổ biến rộng rãi bởi nhà đa ngôn ngữ học Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Nguyên lý cốt lõi đơn giản nhưng cực kỳ hiệu quả: bạn nghe tiếng Anh của người bản xứ và lặp lại to ngay lập tức — như một "cái bóng" (shadow) đuổi theo người nói với độ trễ chỉ 1–2 giây. Khác với luyện ngữ pháp hay học từ vựng bị động, Shadowing buộc não bộ và cơ miệng phải đồng thời xử lý và tái tạo ngôn ngữ thực tế. Các nghiên cứu khoa học xác nhận phương pháp này cải thiện đáng kể phát âm, ngữ điệu, nhịp điệu, nối âm, kỹ năng nghe và độ lưu loát khi nói — đặc biệt hiệu quả cho người luyện IELTS Speaking và muốn giao tiếp tiếng Anh tự nhiên như người bản ngữ.