跟讀練習: Should social media platforms censor hate speech? | Nadine Strossen | Big Think - 通過影片學習英語口語
選擇練習模式
每種模式都會開啟全屏練習室。
33 句
如果句子過短或過長，請點選 Edit 進行調整。
1
social media platforms present the same issues that we have been grappling with with respect to older media but throughout human history every time a
2
new medium of communication comes along many people including many government officials become very exercised about the new power and the allegedly new
3
harms that are posed so we went through this when radio was invented when the telephone was invented when television was invented when the world wide web
4
came to people's attention and in fact I have read that when the printing press was invented and when papyrus was invented there were similar eruptions of
5
fear about this great new power to distribute information and the harm that can be done through information and disinformation so I think it's really
6
important for us to have historic humility and not see what we're what we're going through now is inherently different and more dangerous than the
7
past and I think that the same fundamental principles that have applied to other media should apply to social media as well first of all as private
8
sector entities social media companies have absolutely no legal obligation to respect First Amendment rights free speech rights for anybody else so just
9
as I have no right to participate in your wonderful film and I have no right to have an op-ed in the New York Times I have no right to have my post displayed
10
on Facebook or Twitter and so forth moreover those companies have their own First Amendment rights to make their own editorial decisions about what
11
expression they are going to allow on their platform and what they're not going to allow is somebody who defend free speech right for media company so along with other companies would oppose government
12
restriction on the ability of these companies to decide what they will air and what they will not air however I will raise my voice to urge these
13
companies to adhere as closely as as feasible to the same basic standards that are reflected in the First Amendment because I think that for all
14
of the potential damage that can be done by various kinds of online communications including disinformation and so-called fake news and political
15
ads and so forth that far more harm is done when we empower these largely unaccountable private sector you know really powerful entities to pick and
16
choose what expression is going to be aired and what will not be aired and that danger is especially great when we are talking about political speech the
17
Supreme Court has consistently said throughout history of all expression that is important in our system of government by far the most important is
18
speech about public affairs speech about politics We the People to quote the opening words of our Constitution we wield sovereign power but how can we do
19
that responsibly or effectively if we do not have access full access to information about those who are running for office those who are seeking our
20
votes those who are making public policy decisions most of the time when people advocate censorship beyond the emergency situation in which First Amendment law
21
allows speech to be censored most of the part-time people talk about the harm that speech can cause whether it be dissin formation / fake news or whether
22
it be hate speech or whether it be terrorist content and I agree speech have an enormous capacity to do harm as well as an enormous capacity to do good
23
we protect it precisely because it is so powerful but the argument 99.9 percent of the time starts and ends with the potential harm of free speech those who
24
advocate censorship never examine whether censorship is going to be effective in addressing redressing reducing the harm they never address
25
whether censorship to the contrary is going to do more harm than good and every situation that I'm aware of censorship actually ends up being
26
ineffective in addressing the harms at stake at best or counterproductive at worse so disinformation well are we going to
27
say that empowering mark zuckerberg and the other Titans of Silicon Valley to decide that certain speech is untrue is that actually going to solve our
28
political problems I think to the contrary that is as threatening to democracy as it is to individual freedom likewise with respect to so-called hate
29
speech that conveys discriminatory ideas against traditionally marginalized or excluded groups every hate speech law around the world to this day is
30
disproportional and Forrest consistently against the very minority groups who are hoped to be protected and we shouldn't be surprised at that once you have these
31
discretionary standards what is hate speech what is disinformation no two individuals can agree on such inherently subjective concepts and so by definition those who wield power are going to wield
32
their discretion in ways that predictably are going to perpetuate their power and not empower those who have traditionally been silenced or
33
marginalized
同頻道
C12
The shock of doing nothing | Andrew Holecek
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
Where is the evidence for God? | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
How many people are in hell? | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
Why schools of the future will be designed with geneticists | Kathryn Paige Harden
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C14
Why sex, food, and shelter aren’t enough for Homo Sapiens | Agustín Fuentes
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Evolution explains kindness—even when it kills us | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Become a great strategic thinker | Ian Bremmer
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C16
Kids don’t always make you happier. Here’s why people have them anyway. | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
Supernatural thinking: Your brain’s anti-anxiety mode | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
A mind-blowing explanation of symmetry | Frank Wilczek for Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
How evolution works, in 54 minutes | Sean B. Carroll: Full Interview
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
Mindfulness isn’t the only powerful mental state | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Why ‘turning the other cheek’ is fundamentally misunderstood | Bishop Robert Barron
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
What kind of atheist are you? | Clay Routledge
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C185
What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
How do elite performers automate their habits? | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B25
Hit peak performance with the power of habit | Wendy Wood
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
Why I’m against empathy | Paul Bloom
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
The famous tree-falling thought experiment has a new answer | Lisa Feldman Barrett
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
12 traits emotionally intelligent people share (You can learn them) | Daniel Goleman for Big Think+
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU
推薦影片
C12
132 句
Nishad Sanzagiri | Technology Empires Debate | Proposition (1/6)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B230
18 句
Barack Obama takes on 'woke' call-out culture: 'That's not activism'
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C18
104 句
Should fluoride be in our water?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C111
22 句
Sức mạnh của truyền thông trong việc ảnh hưởng hành vi cộng đồng
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
![Theodore Roosevelt "The Right of the People to Rule" Speech (1912) [AUDIO RESTORED]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/kRaYxYTlGVM/mqdefault.jpg)
C13
43 句
Theodore Roosevelt "The Right of the People to Rule" Speech (1912) [AUDIO RESTORED]
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C19
193 句
Amartya Sen interview (1999)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C17
74 句
The “Nietzsche Thesis”: Why we don’t really care about truth
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
207 句
Katie Hopkins | We Should NOT Support No Platforming (6/8) | Oxford Union
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B24
211 句
ENGLISH SPEECH | MARK ZUCKERBERG: Free Speech (English Subtitles)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C16
122 句
2. Socratic Citizenship: Plato's Apology
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C16
32 句
Anti-matter & nuclear weapons: Why technology is always a double-edge sword | Don Lincoln
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C111
372 句
The 3 ways stupidity spreads throughout a society | Jonny Thomson
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
關於本課
在本課中，學習者將通過觀看與社交媒體言論審查相關的討論影片，練習英語口語技能。影片中，娜丁·斯托森（Nadine Strossen）分享了關於言論自由和社會媒體平臺的歷史視角。學習者將有機會了解在新媒體環境中言論審查的挑戰，以及如何在這樣的複雜討論中使用英語表達個人觀點。這節課特別適合希望提高自己的英語口語和理解能力的學習者，尤其是那些準備參與社會話題討論的學習者。
關鍵詞彙與短語
- 社交媒體平臺 (social media platforms)
- 言論自由 (free speech)
- 審查制度 (censorship)
- 資訊失實 (disinformation)
- 仇恨言論 (hate speech)
- 公眾事務 (public affairs)
- 政治言論 (political speech)
- 邊際化群體 (marginalized groups)
練習技巧
在進行看YouTube學英語時，建議學習者採取影子跟讀的方式進行練習。在觀看影片時，可以暫停並儘量模仿娜丁的語調和語速。通過英語影子跟讀，學習者不僅能夠提高口語流利度，還可以加強對如何在複雜的語言環境中表達觀點的理解。建議每次觀看時將注意力集中在她如何構建句子、使用重音和語調上，從而獲取對話的真實語境。隨著時間的推移，學習者將能夠更自信地參與社交媒體討論，並在表達自己的觀點時使用更豐富的詞彙和句型。記得在練習的時候保持評價的開放心態，不斷調整自己的發音和表達方式，以達到最佳效果。
影片中的語法
說話人最常用的結構，並附上影片中的原話：
| 結構 | 影片中的用法 |
|---|---|
| 被動語態 be + 過去分詞 — 強調發生了什麼，而不是誰做的 | are posed · was invented · can be done |
| 定語從句 who / which + 從句 — 補充說明人或事物 | somebody who defend · those who are · those who wield |
| 現在完成時 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去發生但與現在仍有關聯的事 | have read · have applied |
什麼是跟讀法？
跟讀法 (Shadowing) 是一種有科學依據的語言學習技巧，最初開發用於專業口譯員的培訓，並由多語言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。這個方法簡單而強大：您在聽英語母語原聲的同時立即大聲重複——就像是一個延遲1-2秒緊跟說話者的影子。與被動聽力或語法練習不同，跟讀法強迫您的大腦和口腔肌肉同時處理並模模擬實的講話模式。研究表明它能顯著提高發音準確性，語調，節奏，連讀，聽力理解和口語流利度——使其成為雅思口語備考和真實英語交流最有效的方法之一。